
Archive for the ‘Sex Issue’ Category
Sexiled and hot to trot: Where to hook up when your room isn’t an option
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 | Evan Wiskup
Freakynomics: An economic analysis of a gentlemen’s club
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 | Sam BaierRichard Feynman, Pacman Jones and Dennis Rodman-all great men, all leaders in their respective fields. All frequent strip club patrons.
Coincidence? I think not.
Strip clubs are, as defined by noted social commentator Chris Rock, “a place for all the married men of America.” As a demographic with a decent amount of discretionary income, these men are the driving economic force behind the $5 billion strip club industry. This capital is concentrated in relatively few hands: A mid-sized club can generate $15,000-$20,000 in revenue on a Saturday night, and a stripper with an absolute advantage can earn nearly $1,000 in a night.
But how are these lucrative businesses structured? How equitable is the distribution of wealth? What is the marginal utility of an additional hour on the pole? Economists were dying to know, and as my capstone experience I elected to conduct a microeconomic positive analysis of the strip club industry.
What I discovered was a startlingly efficient business model revolving around independent contractors-the strippers. In contrast to regular employees, strippers retain more control over hours worked, jobs accepted and the quality of their performance. Cinnamon, a dancer at a local gentlemen’s club, gave me some hard data about strippers’ tax requirements.
“As independent contractors we’re required to fill out 1099-MISCs,” she said. “The paperwork’s a breeze and we can deduct any work-related expenses, like tear-away pants and 8-inch glass heels.”
Because the clubs provide the stage area and any private rooms utilized, many require payment from strippers at the onset of the evening. The strippers, in turn, keep any and all tips. The initial direction of the cash flow sheds light on two elementary paradoxes evident in all strip clubs.
1) The ugly stripper paradox. The club has an incentive to get as many dancers on the stage as possible, as a part of their revenue is directly proportional to the number of strippers stripping. Naturally, there is a scarcity of attractive women, ergo, ugly strippers. However, while the invisible hand of the market economy fills attractive strippers’ g-strings with singles, it tends to gently usher ugly strippers offstage. The remaining ugly strippers are a product of asymmetrical information. There is a finite time most men have at a strip club, so they might settle for a less attractive stripper if they don’t know a more attractive one is just a few songs away.
2) The over-enthusiastic stripper paradox. We’ve all seen them-dedicated strippers who literally work their pants off for any dollar they can get. What’s driving these women, in addition to professional pride, is the expense of working. If the stripper makes a $30 payment at the beginning of the night, then most of her first hour would be spent just getting back into the green.
Rational people respond to incentives, so having strippers start their shift with a deficit gives them strong encouragement to dance the night away. This effect is magnified for average-looking strippers, who don’t garner as much in tips, and over-enthusiastic strippers tend to be average-looking.
Clubs also draw revenue from cover charges and the sale of complementary goods such as alcohol and cigars. Though the clubs’ independent-contractor relationship with their strippers somewhat limits their legal liability, in most cases, clubs hire bouncers to maintain a positive working environment. Bouncers are paid at a flat, hourly rate, and in some cases the strippers are also required to tip them at the end of the shift.
Demand for strip clubs seems fairly inelastic, as moves by the states of Texas and Nevada to tax strip clubs (sometimes by 25-30 percent) have been met with little industry resistance (this also indicates that strip club tax rates are currently on the upward-sloping side of the Laffer curve). The customer’s relative purchasing power also has little effect on strip club attendance-the wealthy visit just as often as the poor. However, price discrimination (usually having a weekday college or trucker night) is often utilized to increase market penetration and increase consumer surplus. Ultimately, though, strip clubs market luxury goods; holistically these facts suggest a kinked demand curve.
Although this article provides a solid introduction to the economic workings of the strip club industry, its length means it cannot begin to reflect all the conclusions I’ve made in my hours of (rather expensive) fieldwork, and by no means should it be taken as the 21st century’s first definitive work on stripper economics.
Rather, this article was meant merely to arouse interest in the subject and provide a springboard for future studies. Important questions clearly remain: How slim is the profit margin of a club that opens at noon on a Monday? Would Washington University benefit from adopting the independent contractor business model? What are the effects of strip clubs on substitute goods such as meaningful relationships and pornography? If nothing else, it would probably do everyone good to consider the trade-offs of taking it off.
Safe sex, with or without condoms
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 | Christian SherdenSo, supposedly all of the parents hate the sex issue of Student Life. This reaction is to be expected. I never used to understand the protection issues that fathers have with their daughters. I mean, all of those fathers were once the boys whom they now intimidate and hurl ludicrous threats at, like “If my daughter isn’t back by 8:30, I will strap you to a tree and pour honey down your pants until fire ants have come and eaten your penis.”
Maybe that’s the point. Maybe these fathers know from the experience of being young what adolescent males have in mind for girls. I am sorry that they think this way, and I would like to allay all of their fears by saying that I only have good intentions for all of your daughters.
I did however finally figure out why fathers are so protective. I was catering a wedding one time when I heard two middle-aged men talking. One asked the other a question: “What’s the worst day of a father’s life? Is it the day you send your daughter off to college, or is it the day she gets married?” The other guy just scowled and clenched his jaw. Balling his fist, all he could do was nod at the query to keep himself from strangling the nearest 20-year-old male. The first guy explained: “Because, when you send your daughter off to college, you know some ___ing ___hole is going to come along and just ___ her (this was accompanied by a fist pounding open palm gesture) and there’s nothing you can do about it. But on her wedding day, you know some ___ing ___hole is going to ___ her that night, and there’s nothing you can do about it.” The two just stood there in silence with wrinkled brows, trying to figure out which of these two scenarios was the most gut-wrenchingly awful. I carefully walked away from them so as not to be noticed and continued serving bacon-wrapped asparagus.
And so I get it. I do. She is your little girl and you do not want anything to happen to her. But she is not so little anymore and to deny her any meaningful sexual relationship is to deny a natural and important part of a woman’s development. Your wives are someone’s daughters too, remember, and for the most part, they seem to have turned out all right. Probably the biggest issue is that you do not want your girl to get hurt. Neither do I.
In fact, I don’t want anyone to get hurt while experimenting sexually, which is why I cannot stress enough the importance of stretching. No matter what you are into, it can always help to be a little more limber. From the missionary position to suspended congress to the pile driver, flexibility is important. There is nothing worse than being in the middle of the Hungarian Bootlegger position, spread out and unevenly distributed as you are, when all of a sudden one person pulls his or her sartorius muscle. I’ve seen it happen a thousand times.
Stretching can also add zest and variety to a dull and lagging sex life. Stances that may have seemed impossible from the pages of “The Perfumed Garden” can go from fantasy to reality with just a few basic daily stretches. When legs can go behind heads, splits become possible and roller-skating while in the act happens, this is when the bedroom really starts to get interesting. Think of how much fun a contortionist has in the sack and know that, with a little work, you could do that, too.
So please, for everyone’s safety and enjoyment, bend over. Oh, and touch your toes while you are down there. You do not want to get a call from an angry father asking why his daughter has a torn abductor as he threatens to beat you to death with the bloody stump of your ass.
Christian is a senior in Arts & Sciences and a Forum Editor. He can be reached via e-mail at [email protected].
One-night stands: a few rules
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 | Nicolle NeulistOne-night stands can be some of the most interesting and freeing sexual experiences of all. You can be more forthright and demanding about your desires. As long as you know you can enjoy physical pleasure without a long-term commitment to somebody, there ought to be no shame in enjoying one-night stands with like-minded people-as long as you follow a few basic ground rules in order to protect yourself.
The first rule of a one-night stand is to look out for your own safety. This holds true whether you have met someone for the first time or you’re being sexual for the first time with an acquaintance. Before going anywhere alone with them, talk to them in public for long enough to get a read on them. It’s not a perfect barometer, but you need to make sure you feel comfortable with this person out of the bedroom before you try anything in the bedroom. Also, keep a cell phone with you and tell friends where you will be. Whether you are bringing a partner home or going to another person’s place, if anything goes wrong, you can call a friend or even the authorities if you need help getting out of a problematic situation. The odds are you won’t need to do this, but there is always some chance.
The second rule of a one-night stand: always use protection. It doesn’t matter if the other person claims that sex will feel better without it, or claims that you can trust them. You don’t want to get pregnant from a one-night stand, and you don’t want to get a sexually transmitted disease. There is always some risk of pregnancy if you’re having heterosexual sex. There is always some risk of an STD no matter what you are doing-oral, vaginal, anal or even playing with someone else’s sex toys. But, you need to do whatever you can to minimize the risks. Always use a condom to cover penises or sex toys, and use a dental dam for oral sex on a female. These safer sex practices are always good to keep in mind, but they are especially desirable for one-night stands to avoid lingering effects.
The third rule for a good one-night stand is to make your intentions clear. You know what your own intentions are, and you ought to know enough not to seek out a one-night stand unless you know you have the ability to live in the moment and not demand a long-term relationship afterwards. But, you can’t always be sure about the other person. So, before you go anywhere with them, tell them that you do not intend for it to happen more than once, and ask if they are OK with that. Do this out of respect for the other person, to give them the chance to back out if they do not agree with your terms.
You also need to do this to ease your own mind. If the other person later says they want to see you again, you leave yourself in the best possible position to remove yourself from the situation or to go with this new possibility. If you want to stick to your original intention for it to be a one-night stand, you can decline and honestly respond that they knew that you only wanted it to happen once.
If you keep these few things in mind when and if you decide to have a one-night stand, it will be a lot more fun for you. The more you do to protect yourself physically and emotionally, the more energy you’ll have left to focus on your sexual enjoyment.
Critiquing the Student Life sex issue
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 | Jill StromingerEvery year, I have to ask myself two basic questions about why Student Life chooses Valentine’s Day to publish a sex issue. The first is: Why does Student Life publish a sex issue? The second is, assuming publishing a sex issue makes sense, why are we publishing it on Valentine’s Day? I believe taking a holiday about love and collapsing it with sex is a mistake. But, as a Forum editor, I have an obligation to write a column for this issue. Still, as a philosophy student, I have an obligation to question the foundations of my obligations. Ergo the following absurd sex issue column.
I have to ask why a newspaper staff feels the need to use its pages to publish an issue about sex. We are far from experts on sexuality, we’re a group that students are supposed to be trusted to report and analyze newsworthy issues. Sure, sex makes for an issue that’s flashy, fun and far more interesting than the latest decision made by the Washington University administration. But are we selling out in the same way papers did when they devoted story after story to covering the more “interesting” Anna Nicole Smith situation? Is it right for a paper to put out an edition that has such little news value? Using the same heading and name it uses for its regular editions?
There are arguments to be made for having a sex issue. You could argue that putting sex out there is important for recognizing sex as a natural part of human existence, and that this is an important step our society needs to take. You could argue that we’re a college newspaper so we should be allowed to have issues that are not focused on newsworthy stories. You could argue that stories about sex do contain important and relevant news for college students.
I still disagree with it. But, assuming we are going to run a sex issue, why are we running it on Valentine’s Day?
Valentine’s Day is supposed to be about love, and particularly in college I think we collapse sex and love far too often. Maybe it’s because right now we’re at a time in our lives where we can’t fully make sense of love. Maybe we’re at the point where we can make sense of sex though. You can see the cause and at least some of the effects right away. Maybe sex is easier, less complicated. The act of sex has obvious stages that can be classified in textbooks. The act of sex has an obvious end. The act of hooking up is finite; we can analyze it. The questions leftover from the notorious “morning after” are rarely questions about sex itself; they’re the more complex questions about love and security.
In so many ways, sex is an answer while love is a question. The act of sex is biology. The act of love is a bunch of questions-it’s philosophy. It’s not a static comfortable space in the world. Love is a question that has to be answered everyday and over time, but primarily everyday. You can’t put together a checklist and know you’ve found love. You find out each morning as you balance your classes, homework, doctors’ appointments, checkbook, hopes, dreams, emotional swings and the needs of the people you love. You answer the question each morning as they do the same.
It’s adding up the way we answer the question of love on a daily basis that defines our relationships with the people we love. It makes an impossible news story. It doesn’t make for good gossip. It does make a satisfying life.
I propose that on the day of the year that is supposed to be devoted to love, we actually think about love. About our family, our friends and also our romantic interests. Let’s pick another day and possibly another venue to analyze sex.
Jill is a junior in Arts & Sciences and a Forum Editor. She can be reached via e-mail at [email protected].
Baseless sex: The Wash. U. hook-up scene
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 | Shayna MakaronRemember that huge crush you had on that cute kid in your seventh grade pre-algebra class? You daydreamed in class about how you’d totally go to first base with him after your parents dropped you off at the movies. Maybe even second base if you were one of those girls.
Oh yes, the bases certainly do bring back fond memories of when any sexual encounter could be summed up in a simple, baseball-inspired response to the question, “How far did you go?” And while the bases were a way to discuss our young sex lives in a sort of secret code, they were also a system of checkpoints in the natural progression of a sexual relationship.
By junior year in high school, our fondness for the bases had diminished, and the terminology had completely disappeared by the time we arrived at Wash. U.
Now we use “hooking up,” generally defined as anything from kissing to sex, in order to obscure the dirty details.
So what about the system of checkpoints? It’s pretty obvious that things have changed since seventh grade at the movies. If the majority of girls are expected to give head during the first hook-up, does that mean giving head is the new “first base?”
Despite what you may be thinking, this does not appear to be the case. At most, the traditional first and second bases (that is, making out and feeling up) seem to have been combined into one, and blow jobs are the new hand jobs.
But as for a general campus mentality on hooking up, most students choose to set their own standards.
Junior Whitney Button explains, “What’s more important than defining what is appropriate and inappropriate is making sure that you are comfortable with what you’re doing and you feel safe. It’s just something you need to judge for yourself.”
Most students agree that the promiscuous hook-up culture is far more popular among underclassmen, but that does not necessarily determine what comprises the sexual experiences. The possibility of dating, however, does often change how the relationship progresses.
Pat Fahey, a sophomore currently in a relationship, says that he likes to, “take things at a much slower pace if [he] thinks it might lead to a relationship.” Fahey also noted that many of his friends have also chosen to “settle down” this year and take it slowly.
Making your own decisions dependent upon the situation is considered to be far more fashionable than pre-designating certain acts as necessary or taboo.
“I think people should accept the fact that as human beings, our natural instincts are to have sex,” explains senior Laelle Busch. “People will do with that as they please and shouldn’t be judged one way or the other-active or inactive.”
So the next time you run into that hottie from Calc II subsection and agree to go back to his room, there’s no need to turn it into a play-by-play of the other night’s Cardinals game. But if you feel like you’re ready to make it to home plate, make sure he’s wearing a glove.
The Contest: Getting Freudian
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 | Dennis SweeneyWe have this thing, the people I live with and myself, and it’s about not masturbating. It’s this contest, consecrated a Saturday ago at 10 in the evening, where we put in five dollars, and the last man standing gets the 25 bucks. It’s on the honor system, of course.
We couldn’t let in people who had girlfriends. The assumption is that they don’t need to do it anyway.
And, would you believe it, one of my suitemates has already bitten the dust. Less than one full week without-well, you know-and he capitulates. “Yeah, but I already had gone three days before that,” he told us while he was still in the contest. Kind of a premature excuse, it was.
The point is that it is physically difficult for most guys to participate in this kind of challenge. You look at a guy, and a lot of times you say, “There’s no way he does that. You know. That.” Thing is, though, he probably does. One fellow in my suite who I could have sworn never masturbates, and never even needs to, was complaining after the first day of competition. “Good sir,” I told him, “I didn’t even think you ever did anyway.”
We have these conceptions about people, and we carry them through the majority of our life, and they are generally applicable in whatever way we need them to be. That guy is really good-looking, that guy is a total cheeseball, that guy can bench press 225 pounds. That girl is beautiful, that girl has a bizarre sense of humor, that girl is just one of the guys. We assume that our conceptions of people are somewhat absolute and that today and tomorrow they will be true. But, I say, human sexuality is the great leveler.
It’s pretty weird to use our (not) masturbating contest as an example, but it’s currently what we’ve got on our hands. I am sorry to say that it does not include any observation whatsoever about the autoerotic habits of women. I can’t say too much about that, because I don’t know.
But I am pretty confident in asserting that no matter whom you are talking to, one of their primary drives is sexual.
I hate to get Freudian and say it’s our sole purpose in life, but one thing is pretty unarguable-that the reason we (and all other animals) evolved the way we did is because we are good at having sex with each other.
It’s kind of sad because most of the time we pretend that’s not the case. Freudian again, I guess, but flirtation and dating and all that jazz are just a bunch of speed bumps on the road to sex. Unromantic perhaps, but it often is the case. We habitually bide our time and delay the inevitable so we don’t feel dirty when the actual time comes. My ever-wise roommate says: “Denny, everybody wants sex, so I don’t understand why I’m not having sex all the time.” I’m with him. He’s a good-looking fellow.
Sure, social constructs and everything. But the truth is like the “Everybody poops” paradigm, except it speaks to, instead of a relatively involuntary natural urge, a main motivation behind most people’s actions. Everybody, then, is an extremely sexual being. It’s a crucial part of understanding people.
Our idea as a suite was to start some kind of Adultfriendfinder.com at Wash. U. This might be a little much. But the least we can do is remember that everyone is driven by sexuality. It might be nice if we could all put aside just a little of the “No, I don’t do that!” pretense.
I think we can safely say, with my roommate, that everybody wants sex, in some form or another. So, really, why aren’t we all doing it all the time?
Dennis is a sophomore in Arts & Sciences and a Forum editor. He can be reached via e-mail at [email protected].
Into ear sex? Go for it
Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 | Katie AmmannI’m sure a lot of you have seen the episode of “Family Guy” that involves Meg having “ear sex.” That’s right-an expression of love involving the insertion of the male sex organ into his partner’s ear. This episode was particularly hilarious, since it addressed the issues couples face when they decide why, when and how to have sexual relationships.
Of course, people can have sex (or ear sex, or oral sex or abstinent relationships) for many reasons. Clearly it’s important to consider not only your own but also your partner’s personal desires, moral beliefs, religious interests and comfort level in the relationship. If there’s anything that one person isn’t ready for, it shouldn’t be done. If a long-term relationship is what you’re looking for, make sure your partner’s in it for the long haul too; if you just want someone to snatch up for the night and return in the morning, make sure he or she is also looking for that from you.
Also, there’s still some controversy over what actually counts as “sex.” Some say it’s only vaginal intercourse; others say virginity is lost when oral sex occurs. I say it’s about the way what you’re doing makes you feel. If sex is pure fun to you, just remember that to someone else it may be the ultimate expression of love, and to someone else it may be what consummates a marriage. (These can all overlap, obviously.)
If you get the same emotional connection or pleasure out of oral sex, that’s great too. Or if ear sex is what fl oats your boat, rock on and lose your ear virginity.
Short- and long-term physical relationships take a lot of trust, thought, discussion and experimentation; so does love. There are countless ways for couples to express devotion and care in physical and nonphysical ways. You can write notes to each other, cuddle up and watch a movie, get a little playful in bed or, like Meg and her boyfriend, get a little creative. As long as you know what messages you’re sending and you are ready to take on the delights and challenges you’ll encounter, you’re all set to give and receive great feelings.
These were more or less (read: a little bit) like the ideas found in the “Family Guy” episode. Meg made decisions and discoveries about love, “real” sex and ear sex, although it only took her 23 minutes or so. Our lives are so full of possibilities for interpersonal emotions, symbolism and physicality that sometimes it’s hard to remember that we’ve got to be introspective to know how to handle it all. Through that introspection, love yourself and know yourself. Give what you want to give; don’t let anything be taken away from you.
As you find, keep or even end relationships, keep a level head. Remember the people who’ve been there all along, remember the good times in all of your relationships, and love, in different ways, as many people as you can. If you choose to have what Borat calls “sexy time,” be safe, careful and confident. And the next time you run into someone from Wash. U.’s a cappella group More Fools than Wise, let them do what they do best-“giving it to ya in the earhole.”
Letters to the Editor
Monday, April 2nd, 2007 | Brian SotakEDITOR’S NOTE: This article was published in an April Fool’s Day edition of Student Life. Its content is not factual.
Dear Editor:
From one award-winning journalist to another, I would just like to say: wow, you guys rock. You are consistently one of the best news sources in this great land of ours; the public service you render unto the community is incalculable.
Last week, when you showed us how NIH funding cuts could hurt the University’s medical research programs, I was in awe. I mean, who else would see that connection except StudLife? Then, later that week you dropped ANOTHER bombshell on us: MetroLink usage is up! You guys must really burn the midnight oil. That one must have really lit a fire under the administration’s tuckus.
Student Life, you are a pillar of journalistic integrity and clearly you are the scribes of the gods. Kudos, Student Life. You are living proof of the power of the written word.
-Rob Woodward
The Washington Post
Man of your dreams responds
Dear Editor:
I am writing to respond to a personal ad you published in your newspaper a few weeks ago. I clipped it out but then I lost it. I was hoping you could send this letter to the purchaser of the ad.
Single white female seeking independent man, I am the guy of your dreams. My name is Mark; I’m 37, kind of tall and properly filled out. I too love Mork and Mindy, bird watching and bondage! I never married and I sublet from a close family member. I understand what it’s like trying to get back on your feet after some rough times. After the court made me notify the entire neighborhood that I had a special past, no one associated with me for months. I know you’re twice my age but I won’t say anything about your wrinkles if you don’t say anything about mine.
Richard Gere ain’t got nothing on me.
-Mark S.
I Ozomatli-ed all over your mom
Dear Editor:
I have a few responses to some of the articles you published last week.
Re: “Better parking would improve Health Services”: Better parking would improve your mom’s services.
Re: “Sagartz, Kressel shine in doubleheader split”: I gave your mom a doubleheader split.
Re: “Bears kick off season with win at Mini Meet”: I kicked your mom’s season off with my mini-meat.
Re: “MetroLink usage exceeds expectations”: Your mom’s uses exceed my expectations.
Re: “Police Beat”: The police beat your mom.
Re: “Voice from abroad”: I heard a voice from your mom, “Oh Yes!”
Re: “Sophomore Slump”: Your mom slumped over this sophomore.
Re: “Ozomatli: Don’t Mess with the Dragon”: Your mom messed with my dragon and got some ozomatli all over her face.
Re: “Senate Democrats to push for larger Pell Grants”: My democrat gave your mom a push.
Re: “Johns Hopkins: We’ll take you down”: Your mom hopped on my john and I took her down.
Re: “The ins and outs of the crowd”: I crowded your mom’s ins and outs.
Re: “The bubble has popped”: Too easy. (Your mom’s too easy.)
Good day, sirs and madams.
-Tucker Max
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict muffins for peace
Dear Editor:
In an ongoing effort to promote campus dialogue about political tensions in the Middle East, Students for a Peaceful Palestinian Israeli Future call on Bon App‚tit to stand up for peace, cooperation and a positive tomorrow. To this end, we would like to see Hilltop Bakery, Whispers Caf‚ and all other pastry-serving locations offer Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Muffins.
Breakfast is the most important meal of the day. If our campus starts each day with an important and delicious message of tolerance and peace, we can make a difference in this world.
Bon App‚tit, Washington University, we call on you to trade in your political leanings for muffins, and together we can bring peace to the Middle East. A muffin a day keeps the suicide bombers and armored bulldozers away.
-Ari Herman Rosenbladt
Students for a Peaceful Palestinian Israeli Future
Higher education does not mean higher procreation
Monday, April 2nd, 2007 | Chastity Absten
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was published in an April Fool’s Day edition of Student Life. Its content is not factual.
There’s too much sex on this campus. I walk to dormitory halls, I go into Student Health Services for a flu shot and I stroll through Mallinckrodt during tabling times and all I see are condoms, condoms, condoms. I don’t need some “friendly” Wash. U. student handing me a condom and telling me to have safe sex. I don’t want to go to the library only to be confronted by disgusting pictures of sexually transmitted diseases. No thank you.
With the members of the University so crazed about STD’s, I urge the campus to adopt a policy of strict abstinence. HPV, UTI’s, STI’s and all of those nasty letters can be eliminated if we would just keep our pants on.
Passing out condoms at every possible campus location only encourages students to procreate. Who needs condoms when you can have a chastity belt? As part of the new abstinence-only education plan, the University can offer chastity belts and purity rings instead.
I don’t want my tuition and health fees going to fund other people’s sex addictions. My parents don’t pay $44,000 to further my education only to have some of it going to the purchasing of condoms. Condoms don’t grow on trees, you know. The University must be putting out so much just to stock dorm floors, student groups and SHS with these latex tools of promiscuity.
An abstinence-only policy would be easy to enact. First off, stop offering condoms all over the place. Save some rubber trees, for crying out loud! Some poor exploited minority population somewhere in the world is probably being forced to slave away creating condoms just so some couple can get off. Choose conflict free, choose abstinence.
Furthermore, the University can develop anonymous hotlines. If you know of someone having sex (it’s not hard with thin walls and sexiled roommates to figure who’s getting it on) call it in and the Sexual Maintenance Squad (S and M’s) can put a stop to it.
So to you, my fellow class mates and my University, I urge you to abstain. Clean up this campus, clean up your life and help end child labor in third world condom producing countries – choose abstinence.
Chastity is a junior in the Business School (BS) and is currently aiming for her MRS degree. She is President of the Organization of Arts and Sciences Majors (Org.AS.M.) and she can be reached at [email protected].