Archive for August, 2005

Busch Stadium: In our hearts and minds for 40 years

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Kelly Donahue
Margaret Bauer

Holding hands, a middle-aged couple leans against the guardrail, peering out into a pit of metal support beams and scurrying hard hats. At their backs stands the soon-to-be-demolished monolith of Busch Stadium, which will be left in the dust when the construction on the Cardinals’ new ballpark concludes next spring.

“It really is the end of an era,” the older man says. “And it’s about more than just baseball…believe it or not, our first date was to the Cards-Braves game in ’66-the stadium’s inaugural game. I don’t remember who won. But the date went well,” he says, while his wife affectionately rubs his thinning hair.

The Cardinals in fact defeated Atlanta 4-3 in that match-off. But now, almost 39 years later, fans such as these are the ones left feeling beaten down.

“It just makes me feel old,” the man says. “It brings home the idea that we’re not as young as we used to be. It’s a little difficult to see something like this turned into something for the St. Louis history books. I know it’s just a stadium, but it’s also a landmark that represents a lot more to me-attending those ballgames as a teenager, drinking my first ballpark beer, and courting my wife,” he adds with a wink.

This nostalgic older couple is not alone at their perch high above the foundations of the infant Busch Stadium.

One college student peering across the site to the new park’s framework says he’ll miss the old Busch despite being a recent transplant to the city.

“The town I grew up in didn’t have much in the way of professional sports, let alone a major-league baseball team,” he says. “When I moved out here for school a little over three years ago, I was immediately drawn in by the atmosphere, and I’ve been a captive Cardinals fan ever since. I like the feel of the old Busch-whenever I’m at a game I just get the feeling that I’m a part of something very established.”

Construction workers are busy laying down support beams and a tour group of elementary school kids walks by on a stadium tour, arm-in-arm. As the middle-aged couple leave their post at the edge of the platform and walk off toward their parked car, I can’t help but be reminded that this ebb and flow of old and new is far from an isolated occurrence.

Fast forward six months from now to February 2006. With spring around the corner, many of us are setting out on new adventures of our own. Maybe it’s the prospect of life after graduation in May for the seniors, the excitement of a budding new relationship, or a really kick-ass summer break destination that puts St. Louis to shame.

In any case, you’re in good company. Spring should be a time for reveling in the present and enjoying where you’re at. Winter’s behind us, and what better time to focus on the here and now then today, the time of year when the first tans appear, people fall in love (or so the story goes), and you can’t walk through the Quad without dodging the Frisbees whizzing past your head.

You never know when you’ll find yourself in the position of that husband and wife, looking back on your first-date locale with an air of nostalgia, wistfully accepting that your ballpark will soon be a pile of rubble or that they’ve turned your all-night diner into a Walgreen’s.

So try to relax and enjoy what’s left of our precious Busch Stadium. And if you really want to make a good impression, buy your girlfriend some Cardinals tickets so she can legally kick back with a Bud Light in the nosebleed section of Busch while it still exists.

Meet the 2005-2006 Senior Staff!

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Brian Sotak

Margaret Bauer, Editor in Chief
Year: Senior
Major: Psychology
Minors: Religious Studies and Writing
Hometown: Florissant, MO
Random Fact: Margaret used to be an avid collector of My Little Ponies. Her interest in the figures continued through last year, when she had to set the hobby aside to become Student Life’s fearless leader.

Liz Neukirch, Associate Editor
Year: Junior
Majors: English and Dramatic/Theatre Arts
Hometown: Genoa, IL
Random Fact: Liz can sing, dance, and act-and she played Snow White in her most recent role in the musical “Into The Woods.”

David Tabor, Managing Editor
Year: Junior
Majors: Physics and Math
Hometown: Lake Forest, IL
Random Fact: David is a champion at the “soy sauce and wasabi” game-and he once ate the green goo from the inside of a crab.

Dan Daranciang, Studlife.com Editor
Year: Senior
Majors: Chemistry and German
Hometown: Mountlake Terrace, WA
Random Fact: Dan is an Apple aficionado who in his copious free time works for VersionTracker, a well-known Mac software site.

Sarah Kliff, Senior News Editor
Year: Junior
Majors: Political Science and Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology
Minor: Writing
Hometown: Sammamish, WA
Random Fact: Sarah has a twin brother who attends the University of Washington. Confusion ensues.

Molly Antos, Senior Forum Editor
Year: Senior
Majors: English and Political Science
Hometown: Naperville, IL
Random Fact: Molly was the first Student Life staffer to join the facebook group “Student Life is Hurting Wash. U.”

Sarah Baicker, Senior Scene Editor
Year: Senior
Major: English
Minor: Writing
Hometown: Carversville, PA
Random Fact: Sarah may be Jewish, but she attended a Quaker high school.

Justin Davidson, Senior Sports Editor
Year: Junior
Majors: Anthropology and Political Science
Hometown: Roslyn Heights, NY
Random Fact: Justin really likes monkeys. Like, really.

Laura Vilines, Senior Cadenza Editor
Year: Senior
Majors: Political Science and English
Minor: Spanish
Hometown: Bowling Green, KY
Random Fact: After several mix-ups, Laura finally declared her majors one week before senior year began.

David Brody, Senior Photo Editor
Year: Sophomore
Majors: History and Philosophy
Hometown: Atlanta, GA
Random Fact: David spent the summer interning at the Senate Press Gallery in Washington, D.C.

Brian Sotak, Senior Graphics Editor
Year: Junior
Major: Visual Communications/Illustration
Minor: English
Hometown: Willoughby, OH
Random Fact: Brian collects comic books and lives in the Lewis Center.

Orientation Schedule

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Brian Sotak
Margaret Bauer

Orientation director to depart for Guildford

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Mandy Silver
Margaret Bauer

Today marks Bill Woodward’s last day as director of new student orientation-a position he has held at the University for the past seven years. Woodward is leaving the University to pursue a job offer as associate dean of campus life at Guildford, a liberal arts college in North Carolina.

During Woodward’s time at the University he has worn many hats, from serving as an advisor to transfer students, the freshman class council, and the In-Town Student Association to directing Parents’ Weekend programs. In his various roles, his primary efforts have always been aimed at facilitating orientation programs.

“Orientation is important because it gives students an opportunity to interact with their peers before the pressures of classes begin,” said Woodward. “It also helps familiarize them with resources on campus.”

Since Woodward’s arrival, he has concentrated on extending orientation beyond freshmen. Assistant Vice Chancellor for Students and Associate Dean for Freshman Transition Karen Coburn said Woodward has strengthened communications across campus, making orientation a community experience.

“Bill has developed a student team of orientation directors and assistants who not only provide great service to students but also develop leadership skills,” Coburn said. “He has also been a fantastic mentor to the students, involved student groups so that entering freshmen can meet student leaders, and extended orientation to meet the needs of transfer students and January Scholars,” said Coburn.

In his new role at Guilford, Woodward will supervise new student programs as well as new student activities. Coburn, sorry to see Woodward go, said she remains supportive of his decision.

“Bill was ready to take on more responsibility,” said Coburn. “There was not a role for him here that would allow him to take the next step. I’m sorry for Wash. U. to lose him, but I’m confident he will contribute a lot to Guilford,” said Coburn.

Woodward, who said that some of his best interactions were with student volunteers, encourages all students to become involved with orientation.

“I think the students who enjoy their experience this year should get involved next year,” Woodward said. “It’s a good low-key way to give back to the Wash. U. community.”

Woodward’s replacement has not yet been named. Coburn emphasized, however, that Woodward’s projects and visions will continue to be developed in the future.

Police Beat

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Elizabeth Lewis

Monday, Aug. 1

8:32 a.m. THEFT, ALUMNI HOUSE-Unknown person(s) entered an office located in the basement of the Alumni Building and took a black Dell flat-screen desktop computer. The door was found propped open with a doorstop. Total loss valued at $2,000. Disposition: under investigation.

Friday, Aug. 12

10:57 p.m. TRESPASSING, CONSTRUCTION AREA-Students found trespassing in the construction area. Disposition: Referred to Judicial Administrator.

Monday, Aug. 15

9:19 p.m. VANDALISM, SOUTH 40-Student observed driving in a restricted area in the grass. Damage was caused by the subject vehicle. Disposition: cleared, referred to Judicial Administrator.

Tuesday, Aug. 16

3:15 p.m. PARKING VIOLATION, PARKING LOT #25-Transportation issued a ticket and seized an altered permit from a vehicle on parking lot #25. Disposition: cleared.


Wednesday, Aug. 17

9:34 p.m. THEFT, SOUTH 40 WALKWAY-Victim stated he left his secured/chained bicycle outside Cornerstone between 2:00 and 9:35 p.m. When he returned he discovered it to be missing. Disposition: Pending.

Friday, Aug. 19

3:03 p.m. MISUSE OF EMERGENCY 911 SYSTEM-Group of students contacted regarding misuse of emergency phone system. Disposition: cleared by arrest.

11:05 a.m. CREDIT CARD FRAUD-a subject described with “twisted” hair, small goatee, wearing a black T-shirt, and blue jeans, attempted to use a stolen credit car. Disposition: under investigation.

11:53 a.m. AUTO ACCIDENT, PARKING LOT #35-a backhoe slipped out of gear and rolled into vehicles on parking lot #35 in front of Simon Hall. Owners were notified and one of the vehicles was towed.

11:35 p.m. DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY, MILLBROOK APARTMENTS-Caller stated that person(s) unknown had thrown a rock through a window. Upon arrival, witnesses advises they observed four black males, approximate ages 18-24, wearing baggy clothing, white bandanas, possibly on bicycles. These individuals were seen near the window at the time of the incident. Disposition: Under investigation.

Saturday, Aug. 20

12:34 a.m. TRESPASSING MILLBROOK APARTMENTS-two students were found to have trespassed in the Millbrook Pool. Subjects released on summons.

Monday, Aug. 22

TRESPASSING, MYERS DORM-Report of a suspicious subject near Myers Dorm. Officer recognized subject from last year after subject was given a no trespass warning. Subject was looking at bicycles in bike racks. Disposition: subject was arrested for trespassing and booked at county intake.

2:28 p.m. AUTO ACCIDENT, SOUTH 40-Driver delivering coin machine washer and dryers struck the light pole on the southeast corner of Rubelmann. The top of the light pole was torn off. No injuries. Disposition: Cleared.

University ranking steady at No. 11

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Elizabeth Lewis
Margaret Bauer

The newest issue of U.S. News & World Report showed the University holding its spot at 11 in the rankings of national undergraduate universities while its rankings fluctuated in more specific categories.

Eleventh is the same ranking that the school shared last year with Northwestern. This year, the University holds eleventh place outright, with Northwestern ranked No. 12. Columbia and Dartmouth are tied at ninth.

U.S. News also ranked the University in more specific categories. The school was ranked nationally as the sixth most selective university, an improvement of two places from last year. The University ranked 10th in proportion of classes under 20 students, 17th in graduation and retention (an improvement of two spots from last year), fourth in financial resources, fifth in faculty resources (an increase of one spot), and ninth in alumni giving.

The Olin School of Business was ranked No. 12, and the School of Engineering and Applied Science was ranked No. 41.

The University was also ranked 20th in the Best Value category, a significant drop from last year’s No. 12 ranking.

Chancellor Mark Wrighton responded to that drop with a strong assertion of the University’s value.

“I think we’re the best value in the country,” said Wrighton. “[The University] is not that different from last fall in terms of value.”

He added that the University’s overall rankings were strong. “Rankings come every year. The overall impression is that people view us very favorably,” said Wrighton.

Nanette Tarbouni, the director of admissions, said, “We are privileged to be in the rankings. To be in the top 100 or 200 is really a compliment.”

She said that “around 21,000 students” applied for the 2005-’06 school year, as opposed to “a bit under 20,000” for the 2004-’05 school year.

Tarbouni explained that students ought to visit the University and form their own impressions, independent of rankings. A student from another country unable to visit might rely on them, but first-hand visits were preferable, she said.

“I want people to come and see what a great institution this is. It has a place for everybody, and there is no way that any ranking can ever capture the spirit of Wash. U,” said Tarbouni.

Students also weighed in on their views of the rankings. Laura Keys, a sophomore in the School of Engineering and Applied Science, said, “I’m not necessarily familiar with the schools that ranked before [the University], but I know from experience that the students [here] tend to be hard workers who are academically inclined. I think the ranking is valid.” When Laura was deciding which school to choose, she “did not know what Wash. U. was ranked. I just knew it was a good school.”

“I did take the ranking into account as a helpful guide rather than something I put an extreme emphasis on,” said freshman Adam Schneider.

Schneider added that the 11th-place ranking was “definitely respectable,” though he would not mind it being higher in the future. “I would like to be in the top 10 just so I can count it on my fingers.”

U.S. News & World Report compiles its rankings by picking 15 academically related categories and then gathering data about each one. Then weights are assigned to each category. The colleges are then ranked based on their total weighted score.

New workers’ wages to increase tuition

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Sarah Kliff

Student tuition hikes could be footing the bill for the University’s new $1 million pledge to improve the wages of lower-paid workers. The financial commitment came at the conclusion of the Student Worker Alliance’s 19-day sit-in to demand a living wage for all workers on the University campus, held last spring in the admissions office.

In an interview with Student Life, Chancellor Mark Wrighton explained that the money would come from the University’s unrestricted resources, a fund largely composed of student tuition.

“Any increase in resource commitment, any increase-whether we expand the health center or hire a new faculty member or commit to supporting lower paid workers more generously-all of that drives tuition and it will be a tuition consequence,” said Wrighton.

The tuition increase could come as early as the 2006-2007 school year, a number that the University will most likely decide upon in January. The tuition for the 2005-2006 year has not been impacted by new expenditure, since it had already been set before the financial commitment was made.

“This issue we’re talking about will be a factor in what the tuition will be and obviously, since expenses are not going down, it will be a positive contributor to higher tuition,” said Wrighton.

The same agreement between the University and SWA that pledged the $1 million for workers’ rights also created a committee to decide how the money ought to be spent and investigate other sources to finance the commitment. The committee consists of one SWA representative, two administrators, two faculty members, and a student representative.

Some students are not enthusiastic about their dollars contributing to increases in workers’ wages. Sophomore Brandon Brown opposes the wage increases and is upset that his tuition dollars will soon support them.

“I believe in the free market and if that’s what the market says that is what it says,” said Brown. “I don’t think Wash. U. needs to be the moral compass of the world and try to change the market forces. That money is being used from our tuition is even worse.”

Instead of drawing upon student tuition, Brown believes the University should look for alternative solutions.

“I think one place to start would be all Wash. U. professors who signed the letter in support,” he said. “I think all of them should use money out of their pockets, out of their salaries-they’re obviously well off and making around $100,00 a year. If they’re so adamant about it, why aren’t they paying for it?”

While students may not agree with the ideology of wage increases, junior and sit-in participant Meredith Davis does not think that necessarily gives them a reason to disagree with this use of tuition funds.

“Our tuition can go to just about anything and the $40,00 we pay is going to any number of things,” said Davis. “Our tuition goes to all different things so we have diversity of student groups and we have a good campus life.”

Like Brown, Davis thinks the University should be considering ways to fund their $1 million commitment without increasing tuition. She added that the committee overseeing the spending of the $1 million would not only look at where the money is going, but also where it is coming from.

“I think in general we need to be looking at our budget and looking at what our priorities are,” said Davis. “I think that everyone who’s been to Wash. U. has seen an example of a lot of money being thrown somewhere, such as the plasma TVs [in Whispers Caf‚] or the flowers at April Welcome.”

Sit-in participants sort out academic, judicial consequences

While the committee meets to decide how to distribute funds, former sit-in participants are sorting out their own academic concerns that have arisen from the classes they missed while occupying the admissions office. Sit-in participant Danielle Christmas has moved on from the University but has not yet received her diploma. Although she walked with her class in the May 2005 graduation ceremony, Christmas did not have the credits to graduate at the time.

“I think the biggest punishment to take place was not being able to graduate on time and not get my diploma on time, but I went into this knowing that was probably going to happen and I’m more than happy that I did it,” said Christmas.

Christmas spent the summer making up the two incomplete classes and one withdrawal that she accrued during the semester of the sit-in. She turned in the last of her coursework in July and is currently waiting to receive her diploma.

Christmas has also responded to the judicial sanctions handed down to sit-in participants by University Judicial Administrator Tamara King. Multiple sit-in participants reported receiving sanctions that included the writing of a ten-page essay on Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience and $150 payments to help repair the admissions office. In addition to the essay and the fee, Christmas also apologized in person and in writing to Director of Admissions Nanette Tarbouni, on behalf of the group.

“I completely feel that writing the paper was more than appropriate,” said Christmas. “We need to be able to think critically about what we did. If we’re in an educational institution it’s helpful to think about our actions in terms of what they asked us to think about.”

She noted that many other sit-in participants also completed the essay and paid the fee as part of the judicial sanction.

Building projects give campus new look

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Helen Rhee
Margaret Bauer

Returning students may feel new to campus this fall, thanks to several summer building renovations and construction projects that are giving the University a facelift for the coming year.

Highlights of the work include a continuing renovation project on Wilson Hall, the old home of the Earth and Planetary Sciences (EPS) department, the announcement of a new building planned for the political science department and renovations to the Hilltop campus.

Wilson will reopen in the summer of 2006 to be shared by the biology department-which will move out of its old home in Rebstock Hall-and the Philosophy department. In addition to renovated interior space, there will be an additional lobby area when students enter the building. The exterior appearance will not be changed.

According to Steve Rackers, capital projects manager for the facilities planning department, the design will be consistent with several new University building standards and initiatives. For instance, University planners applied environmentally friendly principles such as those found in the LEED rating system for buildings. LEED, the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design system, is a voluntary standard that promotes sustainability and responsible energy usage.

“Although we are not going for LEED certification, we are using LEED principles in our design,” said Rackers.

Last year the new EPS building was developed using LEED principles and gained certification under that standard.

According to Biology Department Chair Ralph Quatrano, the initial push to move out of Rebstock was considered when the department expanded. Over the last seven years, several biology professors retired, and Rebstock was unable to accommodate the facilities needed by their replacements. As a result, the department decided to move to Wilson after EPS had moved out.

“We are excited about the move. It gives us more space for faculty and for students. It looks like the renovations will be nicely done,” said Philosophy Department Chair Mark Rollins.

Political science will soon find a new home on the side of Olympia Way. Rackers noted that a master plan for a new building along that street has already been made. The building’s 14 additional classrooms will be shared by the Political Science department and School of Law. Construction for the new building will start sometime in the first half of 2006.

Upon completion of the new building, the University plans to demolish Eliot. It will cost the University approximately 30 million dollars to build the new structure.

“I think it will be worth it, but I don’t think it will be necessary. It will be a good thing. The current Eliot building stands out in the camps. It is such an ugly building,” said political science major Lucas Mette, a junior.

Major improvements are also underway to improve the aesthics of Hilltop campus. One of the projects is the pathway renovation near the underpass connecting the South 40 to the Hilltop campus.

Rackers cited aesthetics as one of many reasons that prompted the University to renovate the pathway.

“Renovation in the South 40 has seen a major improvement in the last few years. But our side [Hilltop Campus] was still in a pretty poor condition,” said Rackers.

He also cited several functional problems with the old design, including congestion on the narrow walkway.

In order to better serve pedestrians, the University decided to widen both walkways and replace the wooden railing ties with masonry. Rackers said he hopes the new renovation improved the appearance and functionality of the pathway.

In addition to the pathway renovation, there will be a sitting area near the underpass with sculptures to improve the aesthetic of the space. It will look very similar to the sitting area around the clock tower.

“That hopefully will be a place where people can stop, talk, converse, sit, and relax,” said Rackers.

The planned sculptures will be geometrical figures, though the final design has not been completed. The sitting area will also be complete within a few weeks.

Cadenza: “The Aristocrats”: 100 comedians, 1 dirty joke

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Chris Breault

Documentaries are making money now. In their push for mainstream acclaim and profit, they’ve taken to aping Hollywood: “Spellbound” was staged as a suspense picture, while glorified National Geographic specials like “Winged Migration” and “March of the Penguins” were turned to bright visual spectacle, the special effects film as documentary.

So it’s something of a relief to find the real thing in “The Aristocrats,” a film about a dirty joke. It’s an ugly movie, shot on handheld cameras, close enough to homemade that you can spot the film crew reflected in Robin Williams’s sunglasses or in a mirror at a restaurant. It couldn’t have less commercial ambition. It’s a movie that’s built like an essay.

The joke in question is ancient (we’re told it came from vaudeville). It was told among early comedians as a sort of test of comic fortitude. The joke goes like this: A family walks into a talent agent’s office, tells him they have a great act. An improvised, graphic description of their act, containing as much obscenity as possible (with no lack of scatological and incestuous reference), is the body of the joke. When they finish, the agent says “That’s a hell of an act. What do you call it?” The answer is always the same: “The aristocrats.”

“The Aristocrats” the film is the only intellectual documentary to emerge from the recent fad, and its true subject is interpretation itself. The joke is nothing but the telling; the punchline is inconsequential, the setup boilerplate. We hear it taken in every direction by the comedians interviewed: it’s the worst joke in the world, the funniest. It’s about show business, freedom of speech. It’s a post-modern exercise, it’s about surprise. It’s a secret handshake for comics. Their tellings of the joke are edited, quickly and deftly, to suggest a single mutating performance, the same concept from every angle.

And in spite of its intellectual heft, the movie is pretty damn funny. It works only after we’re familiar with the joke and recognize the ingenuity of the best versions -Sarah Silverman’s deadpan, Kevin Pollak mimicking Christopher Walken’s delivery, the South Park “Aristocrats” segment, and a wrenchingly filthy take from Bob Saget, of all people. It’s not all good–there are some terrible physical comedians in the world-but 90 minutes of stand-up comedians can’t avoid being uneven.

For all the analysis heaped on it, the joke remains, as Jon Stewart acknowledges in the film, ultimately opaque. The appeal of “The Aristocrats” the film is easier to get a handle on: we’re fascinated with an idea that lasts, whether it’s the Iliad or a story about an incestuous family wallowing in their own shit and spunk.

Speaking of which, “The Aristocrats” is unrated, and contains a lot of the worst words you’ve ever heard, to say nothing of the ways they’re combined, alongside lovingly rendered descriptions of felching and all manner of obscure behavior. I figure anyone who goes knows what they’re getting into anyway. On the other hand, I saw this guy walk out of the theater and throw up into a trash can, so there’s that.

Cadenza: Students go WILD: An evolution from movies to the top event on campus

Friday, August 26th, 2005 | Chrissy Pulles

Of all the upcoming events for freshmen to attend, Walk In Lay Down, or WILD, a campus-wide concert event that takes place on September 23, may be the most highly anticipated. WILD is held at the beginning of the fall semester and the end of the spring semester, and usually involves a big-name artist performing in the Quad with other bands, food, and activities.

The event began in 1972, when freshman Andy Friedenberg decided to write a persuasive paper for his English class about how to put on a free, outdoor film festival in the Quad. His class appreciated the idea but didn’t believe that it would ever actually happen.

“Andy wanted the Quad to be more utilized,” said Anjan Tibrewala, co-chair of Team 31 Productions, the student-run committee in charge of organizing and running WILD.

Andy found another way to bring his idea to life.

While Andy’s English class’ response to his idea was not a positive one, he was able to gain support from his suitemates. They began planning the movie festival for the next spring. The name Team 31 comes from the number of the suite in which Andy and his friends lived.

1973 marked the first ever WILD, where movies and picnics took place in the Quad. The festival began and it quickly became a popular event for students.

“Literally it was walk in, lie down, lay on a blanket, and have a picnic and watch a movie,” said Julie Thornton, Director of Student Activities and advisor to Team 31. “It used to be an all-campus event.”

Around 1978, however, the focus of the event shifted from movies to music.

“A band volunteered [to play], and then they started paying local bands to play,” Scott Abrahams, co-chair of Team 31 Productions, said.

As Team 31 acquired more power to hire bands, they were able to book nationally recognized acts, which recently have included OutKast, Live, Nappy Roots, and Robert Randolph and the Family Band.

This year, Team 31 is also planning a barbecue in the Quad from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., after which one student band, one or two opening acts, and finally the main band play on the stage.

Aside from the main act, WILD puts on Second Stage, where four to eight student bands perform from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. in Bowles Plaza outside Malinckrodt Center.

Special activities also take place in Bowles Plaza.

“We have sumo suits, inflatables, a mechanical bull, and a pie-eating contest with prizes,” Tibrewala said. “People can sign up [to participate] and it’s first come first serve.”

Additionally, WILD draws almost everyone on campus to its activities.

“We don’t have an accurate count, but the Quad is full and the lines are pretty ridiculous,” Thornton said.

An event with so much participation takes a long time to organize. Team 31 begins working in June for the fall WILD and in January for the spring WILD.

“We have people who order port-a-potties, tents, and tables, set up hospitality for the bands, work on publicity by putting up posters and handing out t-shirts, plan the special activities, and work with security,” Tibrewala said. “We start setting up the Thursday before WILD and that Friday we are working from 7 a.m. to around 2 a.m. the next morning.”

Security and safety have played large roles in the organization of WILD in recent years, and in spring 2002, kegs were banned from WILD for safety reasons.

“There were a lot of individuals concerned about the safety of our students but also the various disturbances we caused in neighborhoods, and the amount of transports to the hospital,” said Jill Carnaghi, assistant vice chancellor for students and director of campus life.

Thornton agrees with Carnaghi in regard to the necessary precautions.

“There have been and frankly there continues to be some really risky behavior that takes place at WILD with major alcohol consumption and there’s really sort of an expectation that to go to WILD you need to be blitzed,” Thornton said. “Of course the producers of the show don’t feel that way and want it to be the best concert possible.”

The changes in 2002 also included an increase in security, food, port-a-potties, and the quality of the band as a result of a growing budget.

The money that goes into WILD comes from the student activities fee that is one percent of tuition, although some of it allocated through fundraising.

WILD’s activities begin around 11 a.m. on September 23, and the entire lineup should be announced sometime during the second week of school.