Summer or winter? Those two options, emblazoned on my thermostat, don’t really require much contemplation. Yet somehow those two austere stickers have become meaningful in the week and a half that I have been living in my sophomore suite. They signify just one of the many simple charms about living in an old dorm, and it’s something I do not want to see disappear.
The old dorm vs. new dorm debate doesn’t seem as important once you get out of freshman dorms. A sophomore suite isn’t that conducive to socializing when you’re already living with three or five of your best friends. But here is where the debate can reach a whole new level: while potentially frigid for freshmen who want to be in a more social atmosphere, new dorms can be magnificent for upperclassmen. The only real advantage that I see in old dorms is the balcony, which was alluring enough to make me want to live in an old dorm for a second year instead of going for a luxurious new dorm. As many people say, the new dorms are like hotels. But who really wants to live in a hotel while at college?
Living in an ugly, messy dorm is part of the college experience. It’s counterintuitive to be here-on your own for the first time-and to live in the Marriott Wydown. The relative squalor of the old dorms is more fitting. We’re trying to take care of ourselves, and the hot water goes on and off, there’s a slight odor ingrained in the walls that the maintenance staff (essentially the agents of the superintendent of the buildings, ResLife) just can’t get rid of and the cable box is broken. Frankly, it’s a dump. But for most of us, it’s the first time that we’re living on our own without our parents (who now become more monetary figures than caretakers). I doubt many of us will live in a mansion when we first get our own place. We’re supposed to be preparing for the proverbial real world in college, so let’s get ready to live like we will when we first get into the real world, too.
As the new Koenig makes Forsyth look like Lien, and rumors swirl that Liggett is in its final year, we need to fully expand the old dorm v. new dorm debate. Yes, the old dorms have concrete walls and are currently fire hazards (and that can be fixed with a simpler solution than tearing down the entire building, right?). Surely, a very high percentage of Washington University students will end up living in very fancy houses that will make neighboring houses look like old Liggett against new Koenig. But when we graduate, won’t we all end up living in fire hazards or other possible catastrophes? I sincerely hope that future residents of a dorm named Hitzeman will always be able to flick the switch on their thermostats from “summer” to “winter.”