Archive for January, 2003

Ghost of editors past

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Taylor Upchurch

On a handful of occasions during my days as a Student Life staffer, I had the distinct pleasure of sitting in the inner sanctum known as Brookings 300 while a bunch of older people I didn’t know made fun of our paper, gleefully pointing out misspelled headlines and instances of half-cooked coverage from eight months before. These people, I found out eventually, were called the Board of Directors, and they had magical powers. They controlled everything that had to do with Student Life-even picking the Editor in Chief!-and they sounded pissed off. That made me a little uncomfortable, as I’m sure you can imagine.

But then, after the Inquisition was over, some of these folks did a strange thing: they took me aside, shook my hand, and said, “You know, Student Life is better than it’s ever been. All the problems you have are exactly the same as the problems we had thirty years ago, and nothing’s going to make them go away.” And like that, poof!, they were gone. They wouldn’t reappear for another six months, at which point the whole process would repeat: scathing criticism, followed by a handshake on the side and reassurance that nothing had changed in the last thirty years.

I buy that.

I spent four years doing Student Life sports, constantly brainstorming new features, story ideas, ways to handle our reporters, athletes to profile, and general editorial approaches to take. And after my four years in the sports section were up, I could safely say that not a damn thing changed. Articles kept coming in late, I kept pulling out my hair over the results, and people complimented me on it anyway. The Board of Directors was right all along.

Sometimes, when I’m in the mood for a little journalistic self-gratification, I’ll go back and flip through all the stuff we produced over the years. Without fail, the most successful material had one common element: Whoever put it together clearly felt like being an ass that day. It could be a volleyball recap, an off-the-cuff Two-Minute Drill or Bullpen, or even a last-minute house ad. Whenever the reader’s gut reaction is ‘God, what an arrogant bastard,’ we knew we had a winner on our hands.

Speaking solely for myself, I can’t say I set out to piss anyone off; it just sort of happened. My freshman year I pissed off the men’s basketball team because I described a David Cerven basket as “an only-in-Division-III dunk that rattled around the rim before falling in.” The next year I pissed off the women’s soccer team because star forward Rachel Sweeney told me in an interview that their head coach was a good recruiter but didn’t really know much about soccer… and I printed it. I pissed off the sports director of WUTV, the entire track team, a professor of anthropology, the sailing club… the list goes on.

Not that it began and ended with me, of course: even this year the sports guys went after a raw nerve-and an especially juicy target by WU standards-when they ran a story pointing out the lack of diversity in the athletic department. You see? Nothing changes. What a bunch of punks. And that’s good news; otherwise they wouldn’t be doing their job.

Why? Because a pissed-off reader is guaranteed to pick up the next issue and get pissed off all over again. Think about the most prominent names in sports analysis: Joe Morgan, Bill Walton, Madden and McCarver. They all make a living of saying things that are some combination of erroneous, indecipherable, exaggerated, and/or blatantly obvious. Their only purpose is to make you want to throw your shoe at the TV in disgust. How much fun would they be otherwise?

It probably says a lot about Student Life sports that, during my tenure as sports editor, our best work came while we were having the most fun producing it. Fleshing out that non-timely column I’d been keeping on the shelf for weeks, planning out the eight-page basketball pullout preview… none of it approaches the column I wrote after the 2000 Super Bowl, in which I took the Rams’ victory as an opportunity to mock Kurt Warner’s incessant Jesus-flaunting. I churned it out in the office on production night while racking my brain trying to think of different ways to provoke people. The result netted me tons of good feedback, and a one-on-one meeting in the office of men’s soccer coach Joe Clarke, a devout Christian. Score one for the jackass.

Hopefully you check out the sports page twice a week and routinely see something that pisses you off. You may think that’s indicative of something wrong with your beloved sports section, but in fact it’s quite the opposite. And nothing’s going to make it go away.

And a brief word of advice to all current and future Student Life staff: the next time you meet with the Board of Directors, they will use their superhuman powers of recall to conjure up mistakes you didn’t even know you’d made, and they’ll sound really pissed off about it.

Take that as a good sign.

Taylor Upchurch was the Co-Editor in Chief of Student Life in 2001-2002.

Coach Edwards has seen it all

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Renee Hires
Alyssa Gregory

Imagine guard Matt Tabash racing down the court on a fast break and not being able to set up Chris Jeffries for a dunk at the other end.

Imagine that the Bears are down by two with mere moments remaining, and Jarriot Rook can’t throw the ball outside looking for Dustin Tylka or Joel Parrott to hit the game winning three-point buzzer beater.

Or, imagine a Division I team showing up at the Athletic Complex to take on Washington University.

Well, years ago that could have been the case. The opportunity to dunk and the restriction of the shot clock were introduced to the game in the 70s, and the three point shot came in the 80s.

According to Mark Edwards, who has been head coach of WU men’s basketball for the past 22 years, those three elements were added after his playing days were over and have made for a faster, more thrilling game. Also, before more recent rulings, the Bears used to regularly play Division I programs as well as Division III squads.

In fact, there were several teams that preceded Edwards that would be considered as Division I national title contenders.

“They had a team that knocked off Drake, who went to the Final Four of Division I,” Edwards said.

“We used to regularly play Ivy League schools,” he said. “One of the biggest crowds they ever had was when Princeton came in and played WU. Princeton was led by Bill Bradley, who was the leading scorer in the nation then.”

Edwards has seen a lot of change since his four years as a student-athlete. He lettered every season in both varsity basketball and track and field at WU from 1965-69. He also was voted MVP of the basketball team his senior season.

Following his graduation, the WU basketball program was dropped by the administration for a full decade, apparently for financial reasons. Meanwhile, Edwards acted as assistant coach at Washington State University. However, upon an invitation to restart a men’s basketball program at WU in 1981, Edwards willingly left WSU to return to his alma mater as the new head coach.

Edwards has been witness to a lot of changes in Bear sports between his days as an athlete, his early years as a coach and today.

“The biggest difference from when I played to now is the integration of the athletics into the overall school’s philosophy,” Edwards said.

For example, he couldn’t remember the Chancellor ever coming to a game when he was a student.

“I don’t remember any administration people ever coming to a game, whether it was basketball, football, or anything else,” he said. “Here, in this era, they come to the games, they provide the moral support to the team, and they make the players feel good about participating in something besides just the academics.

“The difference between now and then is there’s a much more vibrant atmosphere on campus that engages students in different things, whether its athletics, the arts, debate, lectures, or other activities. They are just more engaged in doing other things besides studying.”

Edwards noted that attendance at games is still often sporadic, as it was in the past. However, big games still draw big crowds, as was evidenced last Friday, when both the men and women defeated highly-ranked Rochester teams.

The Fieldhouse had near capacity crowds as students, alumni, administrators and relatives alike were loud and on their feet for much of the action.

“The players do appreciate it when the students do support them,” said Edwards. “Whether it’s track, or soccer, or basketball, I think that the athletes themselves get more out of the game and establish more worth to their participation to sport when the students acknowledge their successes.

“That is what was very gratifying [Friday] night.”

Edwards recalled being laughed at by an alumnus in 1981when he said he was reestablishing the basketball program.

“That pretty well symbolized the attitude towards athletics here [back then], It was a joke,” Edwards said. “[Since then] I think that the nicest thing is that people respect and recognize what their student-athletes are doing and support it,”

Another recent development with WU basketball is the increase in competition within the UAA conference.

“The UAA is always up there in the top ten with more than one school,” Edwards said. “From a basketball perspective, [WU] and Rochester are very highly ranked nationally. Those are two teams out of one conference and there are 380-some schools in Division III.”

One of the most puzzling issues regarding this school’s athletics has to do with the fact that, as WU’s sports have gained more recognition nationally, they have lost a lot of local recognition.

“When I played, St. Louis had two major dailies, the Post-Dispatch and the St. Louis Globe Democrat,” Edwards said. “Both papers had a beat reporter assigned to every game, and they often went on the road with us. Every game was covered with an article and pictures.

“The school paper also used to send a reporter with us on the road and they covered us pretty extensively.”

While the coverage in Student Life has since been “comparable,” the amount of local coverage by the Post has fluctuated. Currently, St. Louis’s only major newspaper usually does not bother to send a reporter to the games, despite the community’s involvement.

Edwards found it unfortunate that after four nationally ranked teams faced off Friday, the coverage on Saturday morning was reduced to a short paragraph on the back page.

“In perspective, we’re playing this game for the university,” Edwards said. “The students appreciate it, the administration appreciates it, and the alumni appreciate it, so that’s all that counts.”

WU football boasts a rich, storied history

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Pankaj Chhabra
Alyssa Gregory

What did you do in the wake of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ trouncing of the Oakland Raiders in Super Bowl XXXVII? Most people on campus reopened books that had sat neglected on the floor for hours. Others around the country climbed into bed in anticipation of another hellish workweek. But not in Oakland.

After the game, Oakland police arrested 23 people for public intoxication, and while many more offenders were still sought after by police, so-called “fans” set at least two vehicles ablaze and vandalized local retailers. These acts surely cannot be tolerated, but they also show the unmistakable fact that Raider Nation’s emotions are heavily related to the success of its team.

While not nearly as violent, the same zest for sporting achievement once sparked the Hilltop as well. Harkening back to the Golden Age of Sport in the 1920s, when Babe Ruth was breaking records and Red Grange was breaking tackles, Washington University football developed into a campus institution. Competing against the likes of Nebraska and Missouri, the hallowed soil of Francis Field became a playground for many of the top athletes in the country. In fact, WU boasts an odd, yet rich, pigskin history.

“When you look at some of the guys to have played and coaches here, there are a lot of interesting names,” WU head football coach Larry Kindbom said. “One of the things I like to is keep up on football history, and Washington University has a lot of it.”

WU, originally nicknamed the Purities, started with a one-game schedule in 1890, a 28-0 shutout of in-state rival Missouri. We know that the competition took place at Sportsman’s Park, but the passage of 113 years has done nothing to solve the mystery of WU’s head coach for that game.

In 1907, after they became the Pikers, WU chartered the Missouri Valley Conference of the Large Division, today’s equivalent of Division I. Soon, the Pikers challenged some of the nation’s top programs, including one match up against the powerhouse Notre Dame Fighting Irish. By 1942, WU amassed three MVC titles, all under the tutelage of Pro Football Hall of Fame coach Jimmy Conzelman.

“During our heyday, things were going so well that we had plans for a new stadium with a capacity of about 50,000 seats to be constructed in the late 20s,” WU sports information director Keith Jenkins said. “The depression nixed those plans, but games were still filled with almost 20,000 fans. The games provided a sense of unity not only among the students, but the community too.”

However, the Pikers’ gridiron accomplishments were halted in 1943 due to America’s involvement in World War II. After the war ended, Chancellor Arthur Holly Compton placed a dramatic reemphasis on WU academics, refusing to grant athletic scholarships in order to boost the university’s academic reputation. WU went into the 1947 season as a member of the Small Division, with new players and a new coach, Pro Football Hall of Famer Weeb Ewbank.

Ewbank, best known for coaching the Johnny Unitas-led Baltimore Colts to two NFL championships and winning Super Bowl III with the New York Jets on Joe Namath’s famous guarantee, guided WU to a 14-4 record in two seasons as head coach. A stellar second campaign gave the Pikers a 9-1 finish as one of the best teams in the nation.

“I think that a lot of the football history at this school can be paralleled to American history,” Jenkins said. “After World War II, the country wanted entertainment to recover from all the news of the fighting. The popularity of sports was rising, and in this area Washington University football, in large part thanks to the success of Ewbank’s teams, sort of acquitted itself pretty nicely after being downgraded to the Small Division.”

The football program has not reached the heights of years past since Ewbank’s brief tenure. Although WU claimed three titles in nine seasons of College Athletic Conference play beginning in 1963, the status of the sport among the student body began falling.

By the mid-1970s, the NCAA formed its current three-division structure, with WU choosing to play in Division III. More than a decade of futility ensued, but a close to that futility came in 1989, when Larry Kindbom took the reigns of WU football.

Fourteen seasons and six University Athletic Association championships later, Kindbom has notched an impressive 90-50 record to become the school’s leader in all-time coaching victories.

“Before I came here, people told me pretty much the standard things about the job,” Kindbom said. “They told me that it is almost impossible to win because the players place academics as more important than football. The main thing I tried to do was say, ‘Yes, your work is important, much more so than football. But football is important, too.'”

The Bears’ coaching staff now relays the importance of knowing WU’s history of gridiron achievement to the players.

“We plan, in conjunction with the coaches, visits from alumni and former players all the time,” Jenkins said. “It helps build a connection of the past to the present, and everybody seems to enjoy it when they speak before a game or a team meal.”

Kindbom recalls one visit in particular that affected not only the players but also him.

“A while back we had Weeb Ewbank come in and speak to the team, and it was really something that the players and the coaches appreciated,” Kindbom said. “Here’s a guy who won a Super Bowl, won NFL championships before there was a Super Bowl, and he’s telling us that some of his favorite times came right here at Washington University. It really hit some of the guys, including me, that football is a game of relationships. And this school has made a lot of good relationships over the many, many years.”

Life is like a Subway meatball sandwich

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Brian Hamman
Alyssa Gregory

When I was asked to write this column, I was basically told to slap down some canned nostalgia about sunrises on the steps of Brookings or sex in notable places. Well, I saw my sunrise in the Quad, but only because I was too much of a wimp to kiss the girl, and I prolonged the date way too long. You can probably guess about the sex.

To be nostalgic would be misleading. Maybe it’s because I only graduated eight months ago, or maybe it’s because I work at WU now and spend more time on campus than ever. Maybe it’s because the only memory that accurately summarizes all four years is “foot-long meatball on wheat.”

No, nostalgia seems like a defeat-like I’d be saying that the best thing I took from WU are a bunch of memories. I do have some great memories from WU, but I have great memories from a lot of places. For example, this one time in high school, I put the wrong soap in the dishwasher and flooded our kitchen with bubbles. That’s a solid memory.

I choose not to look at WU as something that happened, but something that’s happening. Right now, I’ve got WU-minted friends and enemies all over the U.S. and several foreign countries. On an almost daily basis, I talk to people doing everything from waiting tables in a yellow-walled restaurant, to waiting tables at the art museum. Pretty much anywhere I go I have a friend to stay and play with.

At WU, we lived in a tightly controlled social environment which was mostly contained by maybe three square miles of St. Louis. And, although we all entered with essentially the same academic backgrounds and (though Bush doesn’t seem to care) largely the same social backgrounds, by senior year we became frat boys, athletes, architects, doctors. We narrowed our interests to fit first into a school, then a couple majors, and finally a thesis. We allowed our social network to contract until we were surrounded by enough familiar faces to think we knew everyone on campus.

We complained of too much work, too few bars, too little dating. We allowed ourselves to be pigeonholed into a major, into a group of friends, and into a single lunch item. Some of us were to be artists, or engineers, or professional liberals, and some made it to the next round on good looks alone.

Then came senior week-the week when you’ll get on a bus for pub night and realize that not only do you not know anyone on the bus, but you’ve never seen them before.

Senior week is a mind-altering experience. With your whole class together for the first time since orientation, you’ll see friendships play out in ways you never predicted. Your friends, it turns out, have other friends. Some you know, but others you’ve never heard of. Underlying all those social networks we tried so hard to build were arbitrary connections made on freshmen floors, in subway lines, and in distribution requirement classes.

During senior week you’ll rewrite much of your undergraduate experience. You’ll decide not to take the advertising job and instead audition for comedy. You’ll dump your boyfriend, you’ll make new friends and abandon old ones. You’ll realize that the rest-of-your-life is not simply the logical conclusion to college.

I guess, when it comes down to it, this whole column was just a gumpian riff. The real world, to college’s meatball sub, is a box of chocolates.

Brian Hamman was the editor in chief of Student Life in 2000-01. He currently works at Washington University.

Student Life: a strong and vital source of news and opinion

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Chancellor Mark S. Wrighton
Alyssa Gregory

Student Life is a vital enterprise for the Washington University community, and I wish to convey congratulations to all involved, past and present, for the wonderful contributions made through the years by Student Life. Student journalism at America’s colleges and universities has a long and distinguished history, and Student Life is among our country’s elite university newspapers. The long and rich 125-year history of Student Life has spanned almost the entire history of the university itself, and our student-journalists have documented the life of the university from their unique, important perspective.

Student-led communications are effective in disseminating information about all aspects of university life to students, faculty, staff, alumni, and friends. Perhaps most important, an independent student-run newspaper provides an opportunity for students to voice an opinion on all university policies and procedures as well as on issues of local, national, and international interest. Washington University has been fortunate to recruit outstanding students, and responsible journalism is now one of our hallmark traditions.

Producing a high quality newspaper requires much effort, talent, and discipline. Writing interesting and accurate news articles and providing supporting photography and graphics are obviously important for a successful newspaper. But there are also business issues requiring attention, too. Clearly, however, it is essential that the editors show good judgment and wisdom in choosing what news to cover and what perspectives to communicate. Student Life has shown consistent commitment to achieving the very best it can in terms of quality. Sustaining excellence in a student-run organization is especially challenging, considering the inexorable high turnover of key personnel as students graduate and new students join the organization.

Students of all generations have experienced interesting and challenging times during their student years, and students of every era have made enduring contributions to the life of the university. Student Life has held the responsibility for lifting the voice of students to the administration of the university, and this has proven to be a rewarding contribution. All institutions and their leaders, no matter what their intentions and resolve to do the right thing may be, can benefit from constructive criticisms from the constituencies they serve. Student Life has supported the quest of the university to be a better place, and doubtless there are still new ways to improve and to do so faster.

New times bring new opportunities and challenges. Today we face a diminished economy, loss of confidence in religious and business organizations, a war against terrorism, possible military conflict in Iraq, and high tension in Korea. These national and international concerns come at a time, though, when we have great potential to create new knowledge that will bring benefit to our society. Research universities must change as the challenges and opportunities change. Students can play a key role in the response of the university to these changing times.

Student Life must remain a vibrant and articulate voice for students and sustain its 125-year tradition of bringing benefit to our community through its news coverage and criticisms. I am grateful to all who have contributed to the strong Student Life tradition and charge those here and present and future generations of students to continue our great tradition of excellent student journalism.

Hitting the journalistic mark with Student Life

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Mitch Margo
Alyssa Gregory

It was 1976 and for as long as anyone at Washington University could remember, Student Life was under the domination and control of the Revolutionary Student Brigade. Like a rare Ming vase, the editor in chief slot was carefully handed down from one student disciple of Chairman Mao Tse-tung to the next. While other student newspapers struggled with Republican or Democratic ideologies, our editorial page was decidedly “worker.”

But through some quirk of fate at the end of the 1975-76 school year, there was no heir to the emperor’s throne. The lower level editors aligned with the Washington University Chinese Communists had all flunked out, or perhaps they were on a pilgrimage.

The beneficiaries of this changing-of-the-guard were Greg Freeman and me. We were co-editors in chief in waiting, ready to take on the 1976-77 year.

Greg was an intelligent and gregarious junior with a reporter’s eye on life. If he were born a racehorse his name would have been “Relentless.” He was a young black man from St. Louis who knew he was going to be a famous newspaperman in his hometown, and that was all there was to it. Greg knew the politics of St. Louis and the politics of (don’t call it) Wash U.

I was strictly New York then. White, Jewish and one of those East Coasters who had come here to tolerate St. Louis for a few years in revenge for not getting into the University of Pennsylvania. To show you just how far Student Life had fallen, the Mao editors reached down into the cesspool of student journalism-the sports department-to find me. When word came that the Revolution was over and Student Life (a.k.a. the Most-Red Newspaper on Campus) was being liberated, I was eagerly recounting an intramural basketball thriller between ZBT and the Phi Delts. My domain was the last page of the paper.

Greg and I hit it off famously. He was a man possessed to change Student Life’s editorial policies and I took on the day-to-day assemblage of the news, sports, features and photography. He found a student voice for our newspaper and I found great editors and surrounded myself with them.

Among my treasured possessions to this day is a bound volume of every issue we published that year. When asked to write this column to commemorate the 125th anniversary issue, I pulled out that book-the largest if not the most scholarly work I own. As an avid reader of the current Student Life I was struck by how much things change and stay the same.

Our first issue was published on Aug. 31, 1976 and the lead story trumpeted a shortage of student housing. Students also were complaining about a lack of parking. That seems familiar. It was also news that a brand new campus radio station, KWUR, was transmitting 24/7, though of course the term “24/7” had not reached popular culture yet. Left Bank Books and Art Mart were regular advertisers, like now, but ads for cutting-edge technology lured students to buy the latest calculators, not computers.

Our best issue was published on April 29, 1977. It also happened to be our last issue and we wanted to go out with the proverbial bang. The three stories on the front page (we were a tabloid then) all were hard hitting investigative pieces we had been working on for some time.

In the lead story, we had used the newly enacted Freedom of Information Act (which has become a staple for U.S. news-gathering organizations) to obtain the Washington University federal tax return and published the names, pictures and salaries of the highest paid WU employees-all doctors at the Medical School. This news may seem tame by today’s “full disclosure” standards, but in 1977 it caused quite a stir.

The second front-page article reported that WU’s nationally recognized darling of liberal, environmental issues, Barry Commoner, had accepted $49,000 from the government of Iran-a dictatorship with a long history of human rights abuses. According to the article, Commoner could not be reached for comment, but Chancellor William Danforth, to his credit, took the heat in stride. He said, “It used to be said that if you went to Iran you couldn’t walk around the streets without seeing several university presidents over there with their hats out trying to money through this program or that program.”

Dr. Danforth was always there for Student Life, both in times of pride and times of embarrassment.

The final front-page piece detailed two potential conflicts of interest that existed on the WU Board of Trustees. It seems that McDonnell Douglas Corporation (Boeing) and Interco Corporation had given WU real estate, presumably for the tax write-off, and WU leased it back to the companies at what was hinted to be a favorable rate. The McDonnell Douglas and Interco CEOs were on the board. Dr. Danforth denied the conflict of interest, stating that the two CEOs were not involved in the decision to lease the properties back to the companies.

The 1976-77 Student Life also made some journalistic history in other, more whimsical ways.

In November 1976, Doonesbury was easily the most popular comic strip in the United States-at least among young readers. Many newspapers had moved the strip off the comic pages and on to the editorial page. Suffice it to say that Doonesbury was big, with a price tag to match, and it was out of the financial reach of all but the largest paper in each city. Here, it was the private domain of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

But on Nov. 15, 1977, Doonesbury’s author, Gary Trudeau, pushed the envelope of family newspapering. In his series of strips for that week, he had two of his fictional comic characters who were not married to each other (now get this!) in bed together. This was such a steep departure from morality that the Post-Dispatch, and most other daily newspapers, refused to run the strips. Their refusal became national news.

You might find it surprising to learn that then, as today, Student Life had a slightly different approach to morality. The entire week’s Doonesbury strips were smuggled out of the Post-Dispatch by a reporter there who will be my “Deep Throat” to my grave. (Note to current students: “Deep Throat” is a reference to an anonymous White House inside source who helped the Washington Post break stories that led to the resignation of President Nixon. See your history books).

Since Student Life only published on Tuesdays and Fridays, Greg and I decided to run the whole week’s strips on Tuesday, days before their licensed publication in the newspapers that actually paid for them. This bold move was quickly followed by a lawsuit-threatening call to Student Life from King Syndications. Luckily, the best defense to any threatened lawsuit is insolvency.

Later in the year we were the only newspaper in the entire Midwest to publish verbatim the highly offensive comments of Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz. The statements got him fired and got us double the circulation that week. We “exposed” a small football coaches’ junket at a time when all other sports at WU were being drastically cut. We covered the annual tuition increase announcement. We were kings of our domain.

I have not had another year like my senior year at WU and likely will not ever have so much fun again.

I have been faithfully reading Student Life since those years, and what has not changed is the commitment to excellence by the volunteer corps of editors and reporters. I will always feel like a small part of Student Life. Yes, we miss the mark sometimes, but sometimes we get it just right, and that feeling lasts forever.

Mitch Margo, Student Life co-editor in chief in 1976-77, is a lawyer in St. Louis, Mo. He is the current president of the WUSMI board of directors.

Remembering the sour and the sweet of SL

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Laura Meckler
Alyssa Gregory

Mostly, it was the buzz.

I liked to write. I liked asking people pesky questions. I liked reading my story in the newspaper a day after writing it.

But it was the buzz that hooked me.

I felt it first at Student Life, and I feel it in my newsroom today. It’s the adrenaline of looming deadlines, of never really knowing whether you’re going to finish on time, and then always, somehow, finishing on time. It’s the energy that pulses through a newsroom-any newsroom. It’s the biting sarcasm that reporters everywhere love to toss around, and the sense that you’re on the inside. It’s midnight pizza and Chinese food delivered. (Once, unable to find a single utensil to eat our chicken fried rice, two of us fished a spoon from the trash, washed it off and chowed down. Now that’s quality college bonding.)

My first assignment for Student Life was to write about the new St. Louis Science Center. What I remember most is the large photo of a giant dinosaur that the editors put next to my story. The only problem was that the dinosaur had nothing to do with the Science Center. Oops. They had to run a correction.

Through my freshman year, I went on to write nearly every week. I cut out each story and taped it to the back of my door. When I ran out of door space, I pasted them to my bulletin board. When I ran out of bulletin board, I put them into a scrapbook. If you had told me then that some day I would casually throw away clips published in The New York Times and The Washington Post, I really don’t think I would have believed you.

Sophomore year, I became the Tuesday news editor, and when the Friday news editor quit, I took over both issues. If anyone thought it was a power grab, they didn’t care, no doubt relieved that another person was willing to spend all her free time at the paper.

We weren’t always the most exciting of sections. I remember the features editors, who proclaimed: “Features: We put the ‘life’ in Student Life!” The sports editors responded, “We put the “stud” in Student Life!” That left us at news with: “We put the ‘ent’ in Student Life!”

Luckily, some of us thrive on the ent.

For the staff, the highlight of the year came near April 1, when we put out the annual “Student Libel” edition, filled with private jokes that we found hilarious and an occasional item that regular readers might enjoy.

A few days before the issue went to press, someone in the newspaper’s business office said to me, “So, did they get you in racquetball class?” Turns out, the sports editors had sent a photographer to take pictures of me, a basic effort in mockery (and inside humor). Lucky for me, I skipped class that day. Still, I’ll never forget the story they ran: “Mad Dog Meckler Extends Incredible Winning Streak.” That was the first and last time my name appeared in the sports section of a newspaper.

A couple of days after our Student Libel issue hit the streets, events took a 180-degree turn for the sadder. Student Gregory Delos jumped off the 11th story balcony of Eliott Hall, killing himself. A Student Life photographer heard the commotion and rushed to the scene, capturing a photo of paramedics trying to revive him. The photo was tasteful and not the least bit gory. But somehow word got out that we had a photograph, and Delos’ friends launched a campaign to try and stop us from publishing it.

It was the most wrenching decision I’d ever been part of. Delos and I had mutual friends, and some of them were appealing to me on the most personal, anguished terms. I knew that from a journalistic point of view, there was no reason not to publish the photo, but I wondered if using it was worth upsetting so many already broken hearts. I’ll never forget sitting on the grass outside Graham Chapel with Jack Grone, who was editor in chief, talking it through and deciding the photo would not appear in the paper.

At the time, I thought the most important thing was whether to use the photo or not. I realized later that the simple process of making a decision was what really mattered. Like so much in journalism, I know now, there was no one right answer.

Today I serve on the board of directors of the nonprofit corporation created to publish Student Life. We try to give smart advice when asked, and we offer ideas for how to improve the paper. I think back to the wrenching decision about whether to publish that photo and know that we could have used some smart advice.

By senior year, I was editor in chief, hooked on journalism in heart and head. I prided myself on innovations, some of which are still around 13 years later. I came up with an idea for an arts and entertainment tabloid. I distinctly remember a small group of us trying to agree on a name for the new section. At a stalemate, we consulted a thesaurus, looked up “excitement” and found “cadenza” on the list. We’d never heard the word before, but we liked it.

What else do I remember? Great stories.

We wrote about the weakness of the sociology department one year, and then next semester, we broke the news that the department would be closed. We spent the next two years covering student and faculty protests.

We wrote about the misdeeds of a dean of student affairs and about a WU graduate who was kicked out of the military because he was gay.

When Thurtene refused to tell us how much money they raised at their storied carnival, we went to the beneficiaries and found out anyway. (It turns out that the carnival was raising peanuts for charity.) Another personal favorite: I wrote a column calling on Thurtene to admit women. I’m not saying my column is what prompted a pair of women to sue the university for discrimination, but I’m proud of being out front nonetheless.

I don’t get to make up stories any more, not even on April 1st. I don’t have final say over what goes into the newspaper. I can’t just create a section because it seems like a good idea. For better or worse, I left all that behind in college. But the buzz came with me, and so did the memories.

Student Life, happy anniversary. I hope your editors know how much fun they’re having.

Laura Meckler, Student Life editor in chief in 1989-90, is a reporter for The Associated Press in Washington, D.C. She chairs the committee planning a Student Life reunion to celebrate the 125th anniversary, scheduled for September.

This Week’s Picks

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Web Master
Web Master

Buddhism and the art of
Japan

Where: St. Louis Art Museum
When: Permenant

“Buddhism and the art of Japan,” a special exhibit in The Saint Louis Art Museum, provides an intricate view of Buddhist art’s religious and aesthetic sublimity. With pieces dating back as far as the 500s A.D., the collection offers art of Esoteric Buddhism, Pure Land Buddhism, and Zen Buddhism. Features include sculpture, painting, and calligraphy. A section is dedicated to pieces used in the Japanese Sencha tea ceremony, a ritual and pastime intrinsic to Zen reverence for simple beauty and the profundity of the arts.

Berlin Babylon

Where: Gallery of Art, Steinberg
When: Jan. 31, 7 p.m.

This acclaimed film, shot between 1996 and 2000, documents the massive rebuilding projects that took place in Germany’s capital following the dismantling of the Berlin Wall. At the beginning of the film, the director inserts a short expository note about Nebuchadnezzar’s Tower of Babel, a familiar story from the bible. Then, in a series of beautifully executed shots, Seigert records conversations between government and architectural officials, soaring aerial views, and plenty of collapsing buildings, showing the ambition of man as he attempts to construct paradise out of an “empty lot.”
This may not sound very interesting to those not interested in architectural history, but Berlin Babylon manages to maintain viewer attention through its great camera work. Also worth noting is the appropriate musical score, which alternates between classical composers like Brahms and Beethoven during the aerial views, and the industrial, art-noise music of Einstrzende Neubauten (ironically, “Collapsing New Buildings”) during the construction footage.
Equally applaudable is Seigert’s non-biased look at German history, incorporating footage of World War II
and the end of the Cold War without resorting to subjective patriotism or sentimentality. Also, without realiz-
ing it, Seigert has made a film that can affect each of us as Americans, since we are now facing our own decisions about what to do with “ground zero” areas. Americans can now empathize with Europeans who have had to resurrect civilization from the smoldering ashes.
Berlin Babylon is presented in conjunction with the exhibition Contemporary German Art: Recent Acquisitions, on view at the Gallery of Art through April 20. The film will be introduced by Washington Universitys Lutz Koepnick, Ph.D., professor in the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures and the Film & Media Studies Program, both in Arts & Sciences.

Greg Freeman

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Molly Antos
Alyssa Gregory

Journalist, advocate, and humanitarian Greg Freeman died on Dec. 31, 2002. He was pronounced dead at Barnes-Jewish Hospital after he collapsed in his Central West End home. He was 46.

Freeman graduated from Washington University with a degree in Spanish in 1978. He was a prominent member of Student Life while at the university and served as the editor in chief during his junior year.

Even after graduating, he never quite left WU; from 1999-2001, he was the president of Washington University Student Media Inc. (WUSMI), the nonprofit organization that owns and publishes Student Life. He was serving as vice president at the time of his death.

Current WUSMI board president Mitch Margo remembers Freeman’s ability to reach a diverse group of people.

“The most amazing part of Greg’s personality was the way in which he did appeal to a broad cross-section of St. Louis and the different people that make up the region of St. Louis,” said Margo. “He was equally loved in the black community, the white community, and the Hispanic community.”

In an attempt to explain this, Margo said, “Greg was gentle, but firm in his commitment to always do the right thing. Greg was a man you could rely on. He would never disappoint you.”

In addition to his board duties, Freeman was best known for his work as a columnist for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. He had written columns since 1992, although he had worked there as a reporter beginning in 1980. His editor, Richard Weiss, also remembered Freeman’s ability to influence a large variety of people. Weiss said this was exemplified by the diverse and substantial group of people that attended the services held for Freeman on the WU campus.

“There were so many people from so many different backgrounds in that tent that felt comfortable being there with him,” said Weiss. “All these people had so much appreciation for him.”

“His best qualities were his motivations-that he wanted to make the world a better place,” he said. “He was always constructive and positive about problems and issues in our community. He never took a cheap shot, and he never took advantage of a situation for his own benefit.”

Another co-worker at the Post-Dispatch, Bill McClellan, recalled Freeman’s benevolence.

“One of the things that I liked about Greg, and something that I find unusual, was that Greg never had a mean thing to say about anyone… even in general conversation,” said McClellen. “It’s really a reflection on how to live your life.”

Freeman also had a large following among his readers. After his death, many people submitted comments to commemorate Freeman on a special section of the

Post-Dispatch Web site, www.stltoday.com.

One submission, written by Richard Callow, said, “Greg was a sweet and thoughtful man…. He was one of my earliest instructors in the virtues of St. Louis-and an invaluable and informative guide to the twists and turns of local politics. Over the years, he was alternately guide, scold, confessor, debate partner, shoulder and friend. I never knew him to say a mean thing about anyone. He will be very much missed.”

Freeman had been a long-time sufferer of medical problems prior to his death. He had received treatment for prostate cancer in 1999, was diagnosed with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy in 2000, and had received a kidney from his sister, Cheryl McKinney, in 2001.

His family has requested that in place of flowers, donations be made to any of three charities: Mid-America Transplant Association, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, or Paraquad.

Ken Cooper

Tuesday, January 28th, 2003 | Molly Antos
WU Photo Services

“I got interested in being a journalist at some point during my freshman year,” explained Ken Cooper, national editor for the Boston Globe.

Cooper, a Washington University and Student Life alumnus, is grateful for his experience working at the student-run newspaper.

“It helped me quite a lot, because I took a few courses in the University College and I was able to test those skills with Student Life,” he said.

His role on the newspaper was that of a news editor, a position that took a lot of his time. While he “can’t put a number” on how much time he spent per week working on the paper, he feels his time was well-spent.

“[Production] was kind of a fun, seat of-the-pants operation… It usually ran pretty late,” said Cooper. “[Student Life] was a good way to know students who weren’t in your dorm or in your classes… We made a nice team.”

This team included Greg Freeman and Mitch Margo as co-editors in chief, during the 1976-1977 school year. Cooper believes that he and his “teammates” revolutionized the paper.

“In general terms, those of us who led [Student Life] that particular year led the paper in the direction of being a campus-oriented newspaper, which was a break from what had been in recent years,” he said. “We made it the campus newspaper.”

One way in which Cooper remembers accomplishing this was with scandalous information concerning the university.

“We sort of wanted to finish with a bang,” said Cooper. “We were the first Student Life staff to publish the university’s tax returns… we had a couple stories about that… including mug shots.”

Cooper compared his current job at the Boston Globe to the old days at Student Life. About the latter he said, “It serves a smaller community so it was easer to detect the impact we had.”

During his college years, Cooper was also active in student government and the Association of Black Students. He graduated in 1977 with a degree in English. He is still an active part of the WU community as a member of Washington University Student Media, Inc. (WUSMI), a board that advises and publishes Student Life. He also received the university’s Distinguished Alumni Award in 1989.

Before moving to the Boston Globe, he was employed at the St. Louis American and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. While at the Globe, Cooper was part of a team of reporters that received a Pulitzer Prize for contributing to a 13-piece expose called “The Race Factor.” This piece focused on racism in the Boston area and affirmative action at Boston area universities.

Cooper’s other accomplishments include becoming the first African-American national correspondent of the Knight-Ridder newspaper group. While at that post, he covered major political stories such as the 1988 presidential campaign of Michael S. Dukakis.

When all is said and done, Cooper looks back fondly on his experiences at WU, in particular at Student Life. He remembers the people at the paper most of all.

“I think it was working with the people,” said Cooper. “We’re still pals.”