Archive for February, 2005

Activism lives through the ’60s

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Sarah Klein
Hatchet

The 1960s was a time of change and turmoil in the world and at Wash U. Politics were raging on campus. In the early 1960s, the Red Scare was not quite over, and according to Beginning a Great Work: Washington University in St. Louis, 1853-2003, Chancellor Shepley had to defend faculty members who were verbally attacked for signing a petition for the ban of nuclear weapons.

Professor emeritus Victor Le Vine of the political science department, who started work at Wash U in 1961, says the University was good about protecting academic freedom.

“[In the late 60s] there were almost daily student demonstrations on the Quad,” said Le Vine. “Being left wing was the par for the day.”

Even so, students were divided about how they should protest. Some favored more violent protests, others favored peaceful protests and some students wanted to ignore the Vietnam War and get a good education.

In addition, there were sit-ins for other issues, like one in 1968 by members of the Association of Black Collegians, who protested the possible beating of student Elbert Walton, class of ’70, by campus police. Even the chancellor had to get involved. Le Vine says there was some threat to bring police in to break up the demonstrations, and Chancellor Eliot restricted them. At one point, he ordered the Clayton police chief off campus.

“He became something of a hero,” Le Vine said.

The student body was experiencing turnover as well. Dr. Stuart Boxerman, class of 1963, now an associate professor of health administration for Wash U, says that there was a large percentage of local students at Wash U during his college years. Le Vine remembers Wash U largely as a commuter school. A lot of students used a trolley car which came up near campus and into Clayton, he said.

However, by 1964, most of today’s “old” dorms had been built on the South 40. About 67 percent of the entering freshmen came from outside the St. Louis area, and students were starting to come in more from states outside the Midwest.

Social life was fairly concentrated around Greek life.

“There were a lot of men and women involved in the Greek system,” remembers Barbara Bindler, class of 1965 and a member of AEPhi.

Greeks held a large number of events, including themed parties and affairs like the “Bearskin Follies,” where Greeks prepared skits for a competition. Bindler also says that the Loop was not really as developed at the time, but they still used to go to restaurants there. She members Rinaldi’s as a favorite among students. Sporting events were very popular as well, she says.

Boxerman remembers students from the early 60s as dressed “a little less casually” then they are now, and Bindler says there were lots of “skirts, knee-highs and loafers” for the women. Le Vine remembers “lots of long hair…sandals…and beads” and “a subterranean drug culture” of the later 60s. Le Vine remembers how protests affected student appearance.

“I had one student who smelled gamier and gamier every week,” he said, and then he found out that “he didn’t bathe as a protest against the Vietnam War.”

The one thing that didn’t seem to really change a lot throughout the 60s was the food. Both Le Vine and Boxerman say it was bad. Also, both agree that Wash U was a “serious minded” school, as Boxerman put it.

Le Vine says, “Students [then] tended to be no smarter or more stupid then they are now. [Wash U] always attracted bright kids.”

Take the trolley to school: WU in the ’50s

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Jennifer Serot
Hatchet

Before the babies started booming, many former soldiers came to Washington University to utilize the privileges of the GI Bill.

This rush of young men to the colleges meant a great deal of overcrowding, remembers Joe Zelson, Class of 195?.

Far fewer buildings stood on campus, and those were packed with lecture classes, Zelson said.

Fewer buildings meant more greenery, especially on the South 40, which held only a handful of dorms. There was, however, something we no longer have: a nursing school.

Although the student center provided a place to do some dancing at night, the student body was much more serious in the 50s, Zelson said. People went to the student center to play chess or bridge between classes. Academics were still a priority.

“The male students were much older then they are now.” Zelson said. “These were guys that had been in the service on the GI bill. I got $75 a month. We were there to get an education, not to get a good time.”

Allen Surinsky said academics were the focus of student energies.

Washington University has always been coined a “place of success” according to The Hatchet from the 50s. Enrollment in the Liberal Arts school was limited to 2,138.

The majority of students were locals. Surinsky lived in the Loop and “walked to school every day.”

The women and men inhabited separate dorms spaced out over campus. The women lived in McMillan Hall, while the men had Lee and Liggett. In the social pages of the yearbook, it is rare to see men and women mingling in the photos.

“These guys were clean cut,” Zelson said. “They were in the service so it was a real conservative looking group.”

Politically, campus was quiet.

“There was no chitchat or desire for groups about politics,” Surinsky said.

These men may not have partied, but they still ate. Surinsky remembers only one cafeteria and described the food as mediocre, though it did the trick. Zelson never recalled dining on campus.

“I remember going to Garavelli’s and a place called Parkmoor,” Zelson said. Surinsky said the Loop was drastically different. There were fewer little businesses and no nightlife whatsoever.

Campus to host “Reviving Ophelia” author

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Shweta Murthi
Margaret Bauer

Award-winning author and psychologist Dr. Mary Pipher will present her research on eating disorders at 8 p.m. tomorrow in Graham Chapel as a special event for Eating Disorders Awareness Week. Sponsored by Reflections Peer Educators, the awareness week runs from Feb. 28 through March 1 and is focused on spreading awareness about eating disorders within the community.

Pipher is the author of “Hunger Pains” and “Reviving Ophelia,” two books about dealing with teenage eating disorders. “Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls,” published in 1995, spent 27 weeks on The New York Times Best Seller list. The book details the struggles of adolescent girls in choosing between maintaining their own identities and the one that society deems appropriate. Pipher is a clinical psychologist and an adjunct clinical professor at the University of Nebraska.

“I think that a lot of people are very familiar with [Pipher’s] books,” said junior Natalie Antin. “It might be better for her to come to Graham Chapel rather than getting a panel of nutritionists to speak because that’s been overdone. This is a new approach to getting people to listen through a book that’s very popular.”

Reflections, a campus group focused on promoting eating disorder awareness, has teamed up with Phi Lambda Psi, the Greek women’s health and wellness honorary, to publicize the event. Reflections’ biggest event is Eating Disorders Awareness Week and they predict Pipher will draw big crowds.

“We’re hanging up flyers, prospecting the RAs and trying to get as much publicity as possible,” said sophomore Liz Boddicker, a member of Reflections. “The bookstore is working with us to set up a display.”

Boddikher sees Pipher not only as a well-known name, but also as someone able to address a current problem on the University campus.

“I think that it’s important that we’re bringing someone like Mary Pipher, because so many of the people on campus are so high-drive, and it seems eating disorders are just more prevalent [here] than in the general college population,” said Boddicker.

In addition to Phi Lambda Psi, the week is being cosponsored by the Women and Gender Studies and American Culture Studies departments. Phi Lambda Psi is involved in spreading eating disorder awareness within the Greek community, specifically targeting sororities.

Antin became involved in the event through Phi Lambda Psi and has been largely responsible for publicizing the event in ways that fit the speaker’s message.

“Our involvement with that is to let the girls know that the event is going on, and we had discussed having some sort of incentive like a raffle prize for a spa certificate that everyone can enjoy no matter what their eating disorder status,” said Antin.

Students play dead for EST

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Erin Harkless

The blood was only red corn syrup, but that didn’t stop EST’s red Explorers from storming Mallinckrodt yesterday as medics rushed to save “injured” victims.

Emergency Support Team (EST) medics conducted a disaster drill Sunday, attending to roughly 25 students with injuries ranging from third degree burns and broken legs to smoke inhalation and swollen abdomens.

According to Disaster Drill Co-Chair Erica Kane, a drill is conducted each semester in order to train EST medics and make sure protocols are effective. The fall drill is much smaller and usually takes place on the South 40. The spring drill is larger, with the whole team of medics participating. Victims were spread out around Mallinckrodt in the green chairs, the Gargoyle and the food court. Chairs and other debris were placed over and around student victims to make access for medics difficult.

“The team on duty receives the call and does triage,” Kane said. “Additional teams are called in, and crews are then sent into the building to assess victims.”

After the medics assess their wounds and heart rate, victims are tagged with colors that represent differing levels of injury. Eventually, medics will carry them out of the building on backboards if they are unable to walk themselves.

EST Field Director Matt Vogt noted that the point of this drill was to learn how to package patients correctly, whether on backboards, stretchers or simply carrying them out. Medics also focused on how to run a situation when there are many patients.

“We have to improvise,” Vogt said. “In real life you don’t have everything you need. The point of this is to watch the other medics, think critically and also learn from your mistakes.”

The disaster drill marks the type of situation that would be an extreme case for EST medics. Kane said a large-scale disaster hasn’t occurred on campus in close to seven years, but they still execute these drills so that all medics are well trained to handle a disaster in which they are the first medics on the scene.

Students participating in the event received makeup beforehand to make their injuries look realistic. Senior Amy Soll served as the makeup artist and said that Kane asked her to take on the job after seeing her work in the production of “Trojan Women.”

“This is a very different job from working for theatre,” Soll said. “There we do design and other preparation, but in this type of situation there’s much less prep work.”

Freshman Manav Singla had not participated in an event like this before. His injuries included blunt leg trauma that left him spread out over a couch in the green chairs area.

“It should be fun, but I don’t know what to expect,” Singla said before the drill started.

Other students found their makeup to be almost too realistic. Freshman Laelle Busch had her leg blown off and was wearing a bloody prosthetic as she lay under the stairs in Mallinckrodt.

“Five people thought I was really hurt and offered to help me,” Busch said. “It’s been a lot of fun lying around pretending to be hurt.”

University police department officials were also on hand to monitor the situation and make sure protocols were being executed correctly.

EST functions 24 hours a day, seven days a week during the school year. Three medics are sent out on all calls after completing EMT training, which involves exams, class, clinical and ambulance hours. These student medics deal with everything from sports injuries to cardiac arrests.

Jim Mourey crowned Mr. Wash U

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Erin Fults
Courtesy of Gina Anderson

In front of a packed Friday night crowd, senior Jim Mourey was crowned Mr. Wash U 2005. The event not only gave the University a beauty king, but also raised over $14,000 for City Faces, a local community arts organization.

“I’m honored by it,” Mourey said of his title. “It’s a really great event. All the guys in it were fantastic.”

Although over 450 males were nominated, only 16 of those nominees were selected to compete on stage. They were freshmen Matt Adler, Kristopher Kelley, Logan Whalen and Chris Rhodes; sophomores George Alba, John Flessner, James Spiller and Barrington Lloyd; juniors Bobby Hoernschemeyer, Mike Duncan, J Reese and Jeff Stepp; and seniors Andy De, Earl Mah, Jim Mourey and David Hill.

The diverse group brought diverse talents to the stage, ranging from Adler’s self-choreographed cultural dance, replete with mad booty shaking skills, to Kelley’s double-dutch. Other talents included Mourey performing a “scintillating” rendition of Britney Spears’ “Toxic,” Spiller’s quick table construction, Stepp’s toe-tapping tune on the piano and the mystifying magical feats of Hill.

Eight competitors moved to a second question-and-answer round, but in the end, there could be only one Mr. Wash U. While Kelley and De were first and second runners-up, respectively, Jim Mourey was given the title. Hoisted up on the shoulders of his compatriots, Mourey, all smiles, joined in to the Mr. Wash U refrain: “… He’s the apple of our eye, he’s Mr. Wash U.”

All of the profits from the competition went to City Faces, a community arts program founded by Bob Hansman, a professor of archietecture and a Mr. Wash U judge. The program, which offers art classes to underprivileged inner-city youth, also provides help with food, rent and legal aide for youth who are forced to fend for themselves or struggling in the projects.

“Through art these kids are breaking down problems,” said Hansman. “What we have is a labor of love. It’s not just a drawing program, but a life program.”

While the Mr. Wash U committee originally started with the goal of raising $10,000 for City Faces, proceeds exceeded the target and Hansman graciously accepted a check for $14,307. All ticket sales for the competition, along with t-shirts and shot glasses sold during intermission, also went to City Faces.

“It’s because of you that City Faces has a future,” said Hansman.

Sophomore Sarah Qian, a member of the Mr. Wash U production committee, said that surpassing the original $10,000 fundraising goal was one of the show’s strongest points.

“The most important aspect of the show was surpassing our fundraising goal, but I was especially pleased that everyone enjoyed the show,” said Qian. “Everyone was congratulating the committee after the show.”

Judges for the Mr. Wash U competition included Student Union President David Ader, Assistant Vice Chancellor and Director of Campus Life Jill Carnaghi, Assistant Dean Darla Dale and Bon App‚tit employee Avion L. Ingram. They selected a winner based on traits such as personality, character, integrity, extra-curricular involvement and contribution to the campus and community. For Mourey, the event was an unforgettale way to give back.

“It was a fun night, a lighter way to bring people together for a strong charitable cause,” said Mourey. “People get stuck in the Wash U bubble, and I think they find out that there is stuff like City Faces and Campus Y and ways to contribute to the community without leaving the campus. It’s a reminder in a fun way.”

Bad call: cell phones and driving

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Doug Main
Craig Wilen

Craig Wilen needed a car. Disinclined to spend frivolously, he put in hours of research on the matter: comparing prices, brands, model-years, calling dealers, calling friends and even his parents (after peak hours, of course). He finally decided on a silver 2004 Toyota Corolla. After the whole ordeal-picking it out, paying for it, signing the paper work-he allowed himself a moment of triumph, celebrating the purchase at the Courtesy Diner.

Six hours later, his car was totaled by a driver who was in an argument on his cell phone. While Wilen wasn’t injured, he was devastated.

“I can’t imagine my car would have been totaled if that driver hadn’t been talking on his cell phone,” he said.

According to a study published earlier this month, drivers talking on cell phones had impaired reaction times and attention lapses on par with those who had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) above .08, the legal limit for drunkenness in most states. Their reaction times were also slowed to levels observed among drivers over 70 years old.

“If you put a 20-year-old driver behind the wheel with a cell phone, their reaction times are the same as a 70-year-old driver who is not using a cell phone,” said Dr. David Strayer, a University of Utah professor who was the study’s principal investigator. “It’s like instantly aging a large number of drivers.”

What may come as a bigger surprise, perhaps, is that the study was conducted using hands-free cell phones. In other words, drivers were not distracted by holding cell phones or dialing-their impairment was solely due to the distraction of talking.

As Strayer explained in a phone interview, talking on a cell phone while driving can cause attention blindness, a phenomenon where the driver fails to focus on important details in the road and scenery around them. This can include street signs, stop signs, traffic signals-and even other cars and pedestrians.

“Most people think that it’s only other people who are impaired while talking on a cell phone,” he said. “But everybody is impaired.”

Study participants of all ages were about equally affected when talking on cell phones. The researchers used a driving simulator, which measured reaction time before braking, turning to avoid obstacles and other tasks.

Strayer also found that people talking on cell phones tend to drive more slowly than other drivers, making them an obstacle.

Strayer’s study is the sixth to date that tested hands-free cellular devices, and like all five previous studies it found that these are just as distracting as the hand-held variety. This has led Strayer to question the effectiveness of banning hand-held phones but allowing hands-free units, as has been the case in counties in New York, New Jersey and elsewhere.

“There’s no scientific evidence for the hands-free distinction,” said Strayer.

Despite the results, the finding has been slow to catch on. A conversation with a Cingular representative, who would only go on the record as Abby, yielded the suggestion that while driving with a hand-held cell phone was bad, driving with a hands-free device was acceptable.

“My son will be getting a new phone in a month, and I don’t see any problem if he uses Cingular’s [hands-free hardware],” she said.

Don Strom, Washington University police chief, urged students to use care when driving with cell phones.

“The best advice is to not use cell phones when driving,” said Strom. “And if you do, hands-free devices are much preferred, recognizing there are limitations with this technology as well.”

Strayer’s other study results indicate that cell phone use while driving is unique among driving distractions. Talking to passengers, for example, is not as important of a distraction because the person can actually aid the driver in reacting to the driving environment. They can point out signs, speed limits or be quiet if the driver needs to concentrate in a busy intersection.

Strayer’s research has allowed him the opportunity to appreciate the real world effects of driving with cell phones.

“I’ve had the opportunity to reveal tapes in which drivers using cell phones have caused accidents which killed them or somebody else,” said Strayer. “That sort of thing goes beyond the academic material I normally deal with and puts real faces on it. It’s a sobering experience.”

Rush numbers increase for frats

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Elizabeth Lewis and News Staff
David Brody

Fraternities saw an increase in new pledges this semester, disproving fears that last semester’s alcohol ban would lower Rush numbers.

The fraternities boasted a combined total of 223 pledges, an increase of 10 people from last year, said Interfraternity Council President Alex Curcuru. He also noted that 330 students attended Rush, also an increase from the last Rush period.

“Many freshmen and sophomores wanted to see what the house was about and what they had to say,” said Curcuru.

Curcuru said that not only did numbers increase, but that they rose in spite of some houses’ decisions to accept fewer pledges. One fraternity, Kappa Sigma, only took 19 pledges this year as compared to last year’s total of 29.

Curcuru attributed these higher pledge numbers to an increased effort from the fraternity houses to woo new brothers.

Earlier this semester fraternities had expressed concern that the alcohol ban could negatively impact recruitment efforts. Junior Sam Fitz, a member of Sigma Phi Epsilon, said the ban affected the image freshmen had of Greek life.

“This year, the freshmen haven’t seen the way the campus usually is,” said Fitz. “We’re spending a lot more money on Rush this year. Usually we just rely on guys to show up at the house. This year we’re really making Rush bigger and better than ever.”

Fraternity efforts to improve rush seem to have paid off. Sophomore Alex Waters, Sigma Nu’s co-Rush chair, organized his fraternity’s Rush events with his sophomore co-chair Hari Amar. Waters said that he and Amar had taken last semester’s alcohol ban in stride and planned a strong series of Rush events.

“The regulations really didn’t have as big as an effect as everyone thought they would,” said Waters.

While Sigma Nu’s pledge class was smaller this fall than it had been in previous semesters, Waters explained that it was not due to problems with the alcohol ban. Sigma Nu was looking not for quantity but for pledges who fit well with the fraternity brothers.

“We’re very excited about the pledge class, and Ben [Kornfeld, Fraternity Marshall] is ecstatic,” said Waters.

Sophomore Joey Spinner, Rush chairman for Alpha Epsilon Pi (AEPi), said that the alcohol ban did not lower the number of students rushing but did push the houses to put more effort into their rush events.

“We were getting to meet kids at the Rush events. In the past, we got to meet the kids first semester,” said Spinner. “We didn’t make our Rush events bigger-we just made a greater effort to meet people. I think there was more overall effort from the entire community. I think everyone really put in effort to meet kids. It was really overall throughout the whole chapter. Everyone was rushing, it wasn’t just me and my co[-chair].”

Since many of the students rushing had not been exposed to the party side of Greek life, Spinner thinks that it may have created an even stronger pledge class. Although he does not see the alcohol ban as beneficial, he found that AEPi pledges were more interested in brotherhood than alcohol.

“It really helped get quality guys interested not just in alcohol but in a fraternity,” said Spinner. “We had guys join the fraternity for the fraternity brothers.”

Freshman Barry Dan expressed the same sentiment. In rushing this year, Dan wanted to expand his social circle and found that the alcohol ban actually made it easier to get to know people.

“It was easier to meet people who were in fraternities and to see who friends for life will be,” said Dan.

Freshmen Dave Wolpert echoed Dan’s experience in saying that he liked the guys he ended up meeting during rush.

“I liked the guys in SAE and thought Greek life would be fun,” said Wolpert. “Also, being in a fraternity will add to my social life.”

Earlier this semester, Women’s Panhellenic Association President Nicole Soussan reported that sorority Rush also went well, with every potential member that turned in a preference card on the last night of activities receiving a bid to a sorority the next morning-something that did not happen last year. This success, combined with every chapter meeting its quota (a specific number of new members needed in relation to the size of this year’s pledge class), made for a successful Rush.

“If you look at the numbers, they’re pretty much the same as last year,” she said of the approximately 280 women who rushed. “The potential new members were just as enthusiastic about Greek life, and the community was just as excited to have them. This is good evidence that this is not a community based on or that highly values alcohol consumption, but instead values sisterhood, philanthropy and a strong commitment to academics.”

Fear and loathing of genius

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | John Hewitt

A true American hero has left us. Hunter S. Thompson defies pithy description. He was a warrior for truth, a demigod, an American genius on par with Fitzgerald or Jefferson. He spent his life chasing after the heart of the American Dream. He waded through the muck, dealing with legions of disgusting swine to find kernels of hope…proof that America was still, despite everything, mankind’s last, best hope for a Good future.

It was obvious that a man like him could never die of mere ‘natural causes.’ He broke every speed limit conceived by mankind, but emerged unscathed. No poison, microbe, chemical, man or beast was capable of killing him. In a more coherent era, Zeus or Yahweh would have destroyed him, scattering his ashes to the four winds and erasing all mentions of his name from all the books of record. Men as dangerous as he was – and still is – are not often allowed to live this long. But he did.

He died in a more dignified manner than most of us are allowed to. A swift bullet to the brainpan guided by your own hand is a much kinder, more humane way to die than from cardiac asphyxiation by thousands of cheeseburgers or slow brain degeneration from the weight of age.

It’s fashionable now to say that Thompson lost his touch after Nixon resigned. They say that cocaine got the best of him, they say that he lost touch with the American people, that he became absorbed in a world of his own creation and that he ran out of ideas. This is all a bunch of jealous nonsense invented by cubicle-dwelling monsters, by men and women who want the entire world to become a repetitive suburban landscape of Comfort and Sobriety.

In his last published article, he laid down the foundation for the next great American sport, shotgun golf. It combines skeet shooting with golf: violence and leisure, the two legs that our culture stands on. His critics and most mortal men will never even be able to approach the divine genius required to invent such a thing. Smaller minds try to belittle him, incredulous to a man who broke every rule but still achieved greatness.

Some day, when you and I are attending to concentration camps in the valleys of Persia, on the beaches of Cuba or the marshes of Southeast Asia in the name of freedom, watching over our poor misguided brothers – Terrorists, Dead-Enders, Criminals – we’ll struggle to remember the dreams and values that once brought us all together. Men like Thompson helped us preserve the cultural traits that make this country unique in history, the freewheeling spirit of the manic pioneers and desperate, determined immigrants and misfits that created the most powerful empire in the history of mankind. And in this dark time of mounting totalitarian paranoia, it is of the highest importance that true patriots everywhere preserve the words and spirits of the greatest of Americans.

The fear and loathing that is descending upon this country might be an unstoppable force. But the ideals that pushed the zeal of Dr. Gonzo do not have expiration dates as the man himself did. All pigs everywhere must take note: Hunter Stockton Thompson is dead, but he won’t be forgotten. You will never escape the truth.

So you got into law school…

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Paul Banks

A long while back I was asked to give a few observations about law school. I will skip to the most important eight months of your young legal career: the first year. To put it simply, the first year of law school will determine what your next two years of school will be like, what your job search will be like and what your first few years out of school will be like.

Most 1Ls (first-year law students) think that in-class preparedness and participation will equate to positive scores. This is not the case. On the contrary, some of the poorest speakers in class turn out to have some of the best grades. That is common because the entire semester hinges on a final exam for which you have had no feedback whatsoever during the entire class.

During law school, save for perhaps a rare midterm, you will be writing for a professor who has never given you a thumbs up or down on anything. Classes in which you think you know everything might very well leave you with weak grades, while you’ll be baffled by how you got such a high score in the class you showed up hung over for. Likewise, skilled writers in undergrad will be shocked by how poorly their writing professors deem their writing. You might also marvel at how poorly the high-scoring papers are written.

This touches on the subjective nature of test taking, and how seemingly arbitrary the grades you get will be. For instance, everyone in our 90-person section knew what would be on our Constitutional Law I final: a commerce clause question, a dormant commerce clause question and one other small issue mixed in. Likewise, we knew what cases would be important to know because, besides how few were assigned during the semester, only a portion of those were relevant to the two types of commerce clause questions bound to be on the test.

So, you might ask yourself, how do you prepare to differentiate yourself from a huge class of smart people that all know exactly what’s coming on the final? You don’t. To be sure, the very top of the class will be better at issue spotting and reasoning than the bottom group. But in between those small groups is the other 80 percent of the class. Grades will be handed out only after they’re forced into a curve. This means that, although about 80 percent of the class wrote the same paper, one person will get an 89 and another will get an 85. What’s the big deal, you may ask? First off, 89 is now the top 25 percent of the class, and 85 might barely be in the 60th percentile, although you won’t know because they don’t break down the grades that low.

What is another problem with this system? Because law firms have nothing concrete to go on besides class ranking once they dip past the top 10 percent of the class, they simply look at the numbers and refuse to extend interviews with those near 85, instead opting to interview (then reject) those just inside or outside the top third, which, you might be surprised to learn, is the difference between an 88 and an 89.

One way students foolishly hope to supplement surprisingly low scores in order to attract job offers is by working at a journal. I say foolish because the top 10 percent have already “graded on” to the best journal. This means that a few meager slots are available to others based on sheer writing ability. Sure, the top 10 percent, by virtue of their first year scores in all important areas such as the archaic rule against perpetuities, felony murder and the dormant commerce clause might have “earned” the right to semi-plagiarize horrific writers talking about securities law, but that won’t console you when you are doing a shelf check at midnight the night before for a second rate journal. The fact that no interviewer has yet asked me about a journal, and probably will never ask either, is but the salt in the wound.

It would take volumes to explore all of the completely lame aspects of law school. Until I bother to write those out I have one piece of advice for you: don’t let that $60 application fee make you feel obligated to take out $100,000 in loans. It’s just not worth it.

Study drugs: an academic arms race

Monday, February 28th, 2005 | Roman Goldstein
Margaret Bauer

According to the free market, the value (to a student) of a nearly complete night of studying is $30. How did I arrive at this figure? Sophomore year, I was prescribed Ritalin, a mental stimulant, to counter the effects of some other medications I was on. The side effects were too unpleasant, and I ended up not using most of the bottle. Somebody found out I had leftovers, and soon a couple acquaintances offered me $30 per pill. I declined, of course, and threw the pills away.

Ritalin is often prescribed to help ADD/ADHD children concentrate on their work. Even for people without ADD/ADHD, it is a stimulant, making it easier to stay awake and concentrate.

The appeal to students is obvious: a dose of Ritalin can help you stay up all night studying, with reduced need for breaks to relax the mind. The people that asked me for Ritalin were studying for exams, and wanted an edge in their preparation. And rather than study regularly for that edge, they found it easier and more convenient to pop a stimulant for a couple nights before their exams.

They’re not alone. A study from the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor found that three percent of the student body had illegally used Ritalin in the past year (2,250 students participated in the study). Men and women reported equal levels of use.

Based on my informal research, students are taking one of three types of study drugs. First, there are the methylphenidates: Ritalin and its stronger, longer-acting brother Concerta. They are similar in many ways to cocaine. Next, there’s Adderall, an amphetamine chemically related to crystal meth that has a high potential for addiction and abuse. Finally, we have Provigil, which is not a traditional stimulant; it promotes wakefulness and possibly boosts memory, but doesn’t aid concentration.

Generally speaking, I’m not so worried about the side effects of these drugs; if students want to take the risk, it’s their body. What really concerns me is the potential that Provigil, Concerta and Adderall will become one more advantage rich students have over poor students.

Performance enhancing drugs have long been part of college academic life. Caffeine has been around and consumed as a stimulant for centuries. For the really needy (i.e., medical students), there was speed.

The difference between the old guard and the new wave is efficacy, safety and cost. Caffeine and speed were two different trade-offs of efficacy and safety. Caffeine is relatively innocuous, but it’s not that potent. Speed, on the other hand, will make sure you’re up to finish that term paper, but it’s incredibly addictive and has serious adverse effects. And none of these drugs were that expensive or hard to find 30 years ago. Everybody had effective access to them.

The new drugs are both quite potent and relatively safe. They are FDA-approved both in terms of efficacy and safety, so odds are you’ll have a good experience. Granted, there are still side effects, but overall, there’s little disincentive to taking these drugs. Except cost. As I noted before, one Ritalin pill goes for $30 on campus, and I’d be surprised if Provigil or Adderall went for less.

Sure, if you have ADD or narcolepsy, you can get these drugs by prescription and have your insurance cover it, but in that case the drugs aren’t enhancing your performance, they’re just bringing you up to the norm. As performance enhancers, these drugs are strictly black or gray market, which explains their hefty price tag. For a rich kid, spending a few hundred dollars per semester on these drugs isn’t a problem. But I doubt the poorer among us can afford that.

Like test prep courses and private schools, Adderall and company will become one more way rich students get an edge over their peers. As drugs advance, there will be even fewer drawbacks to their use, further widening the gap. Those who want to keep up in the meritocracy will have to invest in chemically-enhancing his or her academic performance. It may be expensive, but you won’t be able to afford not to.

Naturally, the biggest beneficiaries of any arms race are the arms dealers. Had I not thrown that bottle of Ritalin away, I could have been $600 richer. And it would have been easy to convince my psychiatrist that I still needed the drugs, for a tidy profit of $900 a month, minus my $4 insurance co-pay.