Archive for November, 2003

Give thanks for a much needed Thanksgiving break

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Ashley Malnove

It’s that time of year. That’s right folks, Thanksgiving is right around the corner. For the next week, people will be buying mass quantities of pumpkin pie filling and sweet potatoes. Then comes the day after Thanksgiving, when malls will be crowded with people running around trying to find the perfect gift for that special someone. Almost all stores will begin playing Christmas music and decorating for the season if they have not already.

Meanwhile, in the Washington University bubble, we know that Thanksgiving is soon simply because we get three days off from school and a plane ride/car ride home. Soon we will be far away from the stress of classes, homework, and tests. But is that all we are looking forward to? What about spending time with family, cooking together and sharing stories of the past year?

In the middle of being busy college students, we tend to forget about relaxing and enjoying our lives. We are consumed in our work, and do not think about life outside work or even outside the University. But Thanksgiving gives us an opportunity to take our lives back, even if it is just for one day. Think about Thanksgiving Day for a minute. Whether you are an avid football fan, a gourmet chef, or just don’t want to do work or think about work, you have no excuse not to enjoy yourself this Thanksgiving. There’s a lot of football to watch, food to make, and I’m sure sleeping in is not out of the question. Few stores are open, and over most parts of the country the weather is getting colder by the day. It’s the perfect scenario to stay inside and have fun.

Not only is Thanksgiving a day to relax, but as its name and history suggests, it is also a day to give thanks. It’s corny, but in addition to enjoying the day, we should also be grateful. I know we can all come up with things to be thankful for, even besides being grateful for not doing work. Being grateful, however, does not mean that we have the right to complain about everything. Yes the cluster system is aggravating, as is the University’s crackdown on alcohol and the new parking lot near Mallinckrodt. Away from the bubble, there are other issues to complain about; pick any politician or their views and someone at this University will complain about it. And don’t even mention Israel. But every so often we need to take a step back, and see some of the good in life and in the University.

Thanksgiving can bring us that step back. We can have a day without complaining. When relatives ask for the fifth time where we go to school, we can proudly say Washington University in St. Louis, and then not go on to complain about how much work we have or how there is nothing to do in St. Louis. As much fun as it is complaining to my parents that there is nothing to do in St. Louis, I know they would prefer to hear about a few good restaurants I’ve found. Then when it comes time for graduation, they won’t start complaining about St. Louis. I bet your relatives would rather hear about a class you actually like than about how much other work you have for your three or four classes. The laundry lists that reads: “I have two tests, one paper, 2 problem sets and a presentation next week” can take a break.

And maybe this break will last longer than Thanksgiving. Our homework will continue to grow, but how much we complain about it shouldn’t have to. Maybe the amount of homework we have is a state of mind. The work will be completed; the test will be studied for, and the problems sets will be turned in. But the amount of homework does not have to dominate your life. No matter how much work, we can all take some time to enjoy life. Enjoy how warm the weather has been in November and how the trees looked golden in the sun for a few short days. And if work still bogs you down, there’s always winter break.

Is it a metrosexual revolution?

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Jessica Hahn

David Beckham isn’t just the hottest soccer player around. He’s the new poster boy for the metrosexual.

Metrosexual? You haven’t heard of that word yet? You have no idea what I’m talking about?

Metrosexual. It’s today’s latest buzzword. Every heterosexual, clean-cut male with a good fashion sense on this campus has been declaring himself a metrosexual lately. Bruce Tinsley’s comic strip Mallard Fillmore had an ongoing storyline about metrosexual rights just a week ago. Queer Eye for the Straight Guy is out to make metrosexuals out of straight men. And my computer doesn’t even recognize it as a word.

The word “metrosexual” might be making its appearance in the United States right now, but the word has been around for about ten years. British writer Mark Simpson first coined the term in 1994, but it wasn’t until his reuse of the word in a Salon.com article this past summer that it created such a sensation.

So what exactly is a metrosexual?

Simpson defines the typical metrosexual as “a young man with money to spend, living in or within easy reach of a metropolis – because that’s where all the best shops, clubs, gyms and hairdressers are. He might be officially gay, straight or bisexual, but this is utterly immaterial because he has clearly taken himself as his own love object and pleasure as his sexual preference.”

Simpson might have originally coined the term with no sexual orientation in mind, but the word has certainly come to be associated with heterosexual men. For example, wordspy.com defines a metrosexual as “a straight man who is in touch with his feminine side.” He’s well dressed, concerned with his hair and nails, and extremely well cultured.

The television show Queer Eye for the Straight Guy is a concrete example of this definition of a metrosexual. Five gay men with fabulous fashion sense, who know how to decorate a house, who know what and how to cook, and know where to spend a night on the town try to teach these qualities to a straight man. The straight man obviously has no fashion sense, is a total mess (including his house) and doesn’t want to be pulled away from the sports game on TV. After extensive help from the Fab Five, the heterosexual is transformed into a metrosexual.

So, is a metrosexual essentially a stereotypically gay man that’s really straight?

With all due respect, I have been treating this word lightly and in a very joking manner. But truthfully, I really dislike the word. I dislike it exactly because of this last definition I shared with you: “a straight man who is in touch with his feminine side.” The problem with this definition and the way the word has come to be used is that it defines both the heterosexual and the homosexual man. It defines men based on stereotypes related to their sexualities.

In my opinion, the word “metrosexual” attempts to justify heterosexual men who exhibit what our society has coined as “feminine” or unmanly qualities, qualities related to the stereotypical gay man. By creating a new category and a name for this kind of man, we do harm to men in general in two ways. One-we define the straight man as messy with no fashion sense, essentially as not being in touch with his feminine side. And two-we are saying that there is something strange and different about a straight man who seemingly is in touch with his feminine side; that it is only “normal” for gay men to be feminine.

Basically our continued use of the word “metrosexual” perpetuates the gender role of men that we should be trying to break down. A man should be allowed to exhibit any quality he wants (no matter how “feminine” it is considered) without having to defend himself with a label. He should also be allowed to do and act how he chooses without it being a marker for his sexuality.

Metrosexuals themselves are helping to erase the stereotypical image of the man. Let’s just not label them.

I’ll see you again come August

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Erin Harkless

A few weeks ago, I received an email from American Airlines with my flight itinerary for a trip I’ll be making on January 2. Destination: London, Gatwick Airport. Feelings: uninhibited excitement and unexpected nervousness. The excitement was expected, but the feelings of nervousness have definitely been a surprise.

As my study abroad experience inches closer, I find myself becoming increasingly energized about the prospect of visiting cities I’ve only seen through glossy images on a screen or read about in a book. London, Paris, Rome, Dublin, Prague, Amsterdam, and Barcelona are a few of the places I hope to visit before May 29, 2004, when I’ll be completing the other leg of that trip, heading to Dallas, then home to San Antonio; hopefully I’ll squeeze in a few more exotic stops between taking classes, writing a 50 page research paper, and working for a company in the UK through the Olin School of Business’s International Internship Program.

While all of this appeals to me, as it has for the past year when I decided that study abroad was the best way for me to spend the spring semester of my junior year, I never expected to be nervous about the trip and the prospect of spending five months away from my family, friends, and Washington University.

After living on my own in New York City for a summer, traveling with my family around the United States on various vacations, and coming to St. Louis from San Antonio for college, I figured I could handle London and the rest of Europe. What I’m finding out though is that in all of these places I was surrounded by friends and still in close proximity to family; while there will be classmates of mine from the University in London with me, I’ll be confronted with an entirely different culture- new tastes, new people, and new experiences.

I imagine this culture shock will be jarring. Fish and chips, lots and lots of tea and a semester without good Tex-Mex-how will I survive? Conversations with friends abroad this fall have shown me that it’s all worth it, and the immediate culture shock is quickly replaced with a love for the city in which you spend your time, the quirky people you encounter, and the interesting places you visit.

After thinking about it while, I realized this nervousness is expected and normal. An ocean will physically separate me from family and friends for five months. Still, I’ll have many modes of communication at my disposal. And I’ll be really out in the world, on my own, responsible for and to myself. Although I have never been to Europe, the experience of going out there and doing something different from anything I have ever done before can only benefit me in my personal, academic, and professional development. Yes, it’s a bit nerve-racking as the time gets closer, but in the end it will be worth it.

What will I miss here while I’m away? This question keeps haunting me. Various parties, Black Anthology, and Thurtene Carnival will all continue without my presence and patronage next semester. But at the same time, I’ll be getting a taste of Europe, and this continent will be spreading its Old World magic on me. To study abroad and have a grand opportunity for growth and exploration seems to be the right choice; staying behind at the University because I’m afraid of what I’ll leave behind is definitely the wrong one.

This place will undoubtedly change and grow in my absence, but I know I will do the same by the time I return next fall-and change for the better at that.

Same-sex marriage is an absolute must

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Staff Editorial

In January of 1959 a Virginia Circuit Court judge wrote, “Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow […] and he placed them on separate continents. […] The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.” He used this rationale to find Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, in violation of Virgina’s law banning interracial marriages. In 1967 in Loving v. Virgina, however, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the state’s rationale for banning interracial marriages was irrational, thus violating the Loving’s rights under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Yet 46 years later a similar argument that “God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve,” is still unjustly used to deny the right to a civil marriage to same-sex couples. According to a recent poll by the Pew Charitable Trust, 59% of the general population opposes gay marriage, while 80% of those with a high level of religious commitment oppose gay marriage. Opponents of gay marriage argue that going against this Biblical order would degrade the institution of marriage.

Keep in mind, though, that in Las Vegas couples can be married by Elvis impersonators and at drive through windows. Marriage is at the most basic level a legal, civil contract, not a sacred religious rite. All couples, after all, must be granted a civil marriage license. Under the Establishment Clause of the Constitution, there is no rational basis for denying civil marriage to same-sex couples.

The only way to guarantee equal rights for gays and lesbians is to expand marriage to same-sex marriage. All 50 states must recognize a marriage regardless of where it took place, yet states have a choice as to whether to recognize same-sex unions or not. A Vermont couple that has a same-sex union has many of the same rights as a married couple, but 85% of same-sex unions are performed between out of state couples, whom in their home states have no legal rights to inheritance, to sue for wrongful death if their spouse dies as a result of negligence, or to even visit a spouse in an intensive care unit at a hospital. Further, the General Accounting Office found that 1,049 federal rights, privileges and benefits are contingent on marital status, and are thus are denied to same-sex couples.

Forty-six years after the case of Loving v. Virginia, marriage and accompanying rights are still irrationally and unconstitutionally denied to couples seeking those rights. This must change. The only thing that can be done to protect the integrity of the institution of marriage is to extend it to all couples, regardless of sexual orientation.

Random Doodles

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Brian Sotak
Bernell Dorrough

A movie offer you can’t refuse

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Matt Simonton
Bernell Dorrough

Dear Friend,

You are cordially invited to witness the story of our illustrious family, the Corleones. On Tuesday, November 25, the Tivoli Theater will be kind enough to show “The Godfather,” parts 1 and 2, in all their big screen glory. (The Corleone family denies any ties between the title “Godfather” and illegal organized crime activities.) A measly eight bucks will get you into the showings, which start at 1:00 p.m., and an extra four dollars will get you some Cicero’s pizza at 7:30. Hey, it’s not Mama’s meatballs, but what is?

If you’ve never had the privilege of viewing our life story, you’re in for a real treat. But don’t take our word for it-these flicks received 13 Academy Awards between them, including the Best Picture Oscar both times. It’s not hard to see why-our family has been through some ups and downs, but we’ve always endured. In the first film, you’ll see Connie’s wedding (it’s too bad what happened to that nice Carlo fella-car accident, we’re told), Tom Hagen giving that nasty Hollywood producer the final say “from the horse’s mouth,” if you will, and younger brother Michael making his first hit-er, really giving McClusky and Solozzo a piece of his mind (we knew ya had it in ya, Mike). The second film is no less amazing. This director type, Francis Ford Coppola (a nice Italian kid, himself), does a great job showing Michael’s consolidation of power alongside the young Vito’s rise. Hey Frankie, we’ve got a fresh young actor named Johnny Fontaine we’d like to introduce you to. The man can sing like a nightingale! Anyway, come down and see us this Tuesday. The whole family’s gonna be there. Sonny’s been feeling a little under the weather since his encounter with machine guns on the causeway, but Mike’s gonna make an appearance, and Fredo’s always good for a laugh. Two great movies and fresh, hot pizza for a total of 12 dollars. Now that’s an offer you can’t refuse.

Your friends and “business partners”

A Story that’s none too original

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Travis Petersen
Bernell Dorrough

Story of the Year
Page Avenue
Maverick Records
For fans of: Blink-182, the Used, Vendetta Red

Grade: C
Final Word: This story’s been told many times before.

Being from St. Louis myself, it would be nice to say that local boys Story of the Year have made in “Page Avenue” a promising major label debut. But, like fellow St. Louisans Greenwheel, who also record for a major label, Story of the Year have made an album that amounts to nothing more than bland alternative rock, made for immediate airplay and for even more immediate disappearance.

Story of the Year, formerly Big Blue Monkey, have been around for some time. Their debut, produced by Used producer John Feldman, is a mix of pop-punk and screamo, alternating quiet and loud parts with melodic vocals and aggressive screams. It’s a formula that has been doing well for bands like the Used and Vendetta Red lately, and Story of the Year doesn’t do anything to set itself apart from the rest of the pack. The first single, “Until the Day I Die,” which is doing well on radio and MTV2, sounds like nearly anything else one might hear on 105.7 The Point or any other mainstream alt-rock station.

The album is produced in such a manner as to remove any rawness or emotion from it whatsoever. The jagged edges are filed off of the guitars, and even when vocalist Dan Marsala seems to be screaming his heart out, it is compressed so perfectly that it just seems like another piece of the pop-punk puzzle.

The only excitement comes on the final track, “Falling Down,” which includes guest vocals from Toby Morse of the similar but far superior H20, as well as Ray Cappo of straight-edge heroes Youth of Today. Both of those bands have achieved, long before, what Story of the Year sorely lacks, and their presence makes it even more evident that this Story has been told many times before.

From Halloween pumpkins to Thanksgiving tradition

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Laura Watson
Bernell Dorrough

If I didn’t make pumpkin pie for Thanksgiving from scratch using fresh pumpkin, I might be banished to a field with the weather-beaten scarecrows.

I can’t remember precisely how it became a family tradition, but for a long time, since Brendan was a young sprout, pumpkin pies in our house have always been made with fresh pumpkin, which makes for a distinctly delicious pie. When he and his brother were young, we always painted a couple of pumpkins for Halloween in addition to carving a big Jack-o-Lantern. After Halloween passed, we washed away the paint, split them and baked them to yield pumpkin for pies.

Any pumpkin which has not been carved will do, but some produce better results. Our search for pumpkins for pie started out a bit hit-and-miss. We discovered that the deeply creased, darker colored pumpkins (often not very good for carving) yielded more flesh. Eventually we discovered some marketed as pie pumpkins-they tend to be smaller, thicker-walled and result in drier, more flavorful pulp.

You didn’t save any Halloween pumpkins? Whole Foods stores have been selling “pie pumpkins” this fall. So you can still get them!

Preparing fresh pumpkin is not difficult. Split the pumpkin in half and scoop out the seeds and strings. If you like toasted pumpkin seeds, wash the debris off the seeds in a bowl of fresh water, rubbing away the goo. Then put the seeds in fresh water to cover with one or two tablespoons of salt and soak for several hours. Drain thoroughly and spread the seeds in a single layer on an oiled cookie sheet. Bake them at 325 degrees, stirring every five minutes until dried and lightly browned. The seeds will continue to dry and darken a bit more after you pull them from the oven.

Put the pumpkin on a pan, skin side up, and into the oven at 325 degrees for about 45 minutes to an hour, depending on the size of the pumpkin. You can tell it is ready when the skin of the shell becomes shiny and soft, almost beginning to collapse. Scrape the pulp from the shell with a spoon and pur‚e in a food processor or blender.

Fresh pumpkin can be kept up to a week in the refrigerator in a tightly covered container, or it may be frozen for several months. You are now ready to make your favorite pumpkin pie, bread, pudding or mousse recipes. The greatest difference is in the taste-hard to describe-but ask Brendan, who prefers fresh pumpkin pie to cake to celebrate his November birthday.

Here are some tips for adapting your recipes if you are accustomed to using canned pumpkin. Fresh pumpkin is more moist than canned pumpkin and may need longer cooking times than your recipe calls for. Just be patient; it will cook. Also note that fresh pumpkin-without the color additives of canned pumpkin-is sometimes more yellow or paler. When the brown pie seasonings are added, the pie color is more of a light brown than the shades of orange you usually see.

Mix the beaten egg yolks with pumpkin, then add spices, sugar and flour. Add the melted butter, evaporated milk and salt to the pumpkin mixture. Fill the pie shell with the mix. If you have too much custard, grease a small oven-proof bowl or dish and put any remaining filling into it and bake this, too.

Bake at 400 degrees for 10 minutes to prevent crust from becoming soggy. Lower the heat to 325 degrees and bake 45 minutes longer. (If you have a smaller dish of custard in the oven, check it after about 25 minutes as it will cook in half the time.) Check the pie by shaking it lightly. If the center wiggles or still looks shiny or wet, it is not done. Continue to bake checking at 5-10 minute intervals until it seems set in the center. When the pie seems firm, turn off the oven and allow pie to stand in the oven 15 minutes longer so the filling will set. Remove it from the oven and cool on a wire rack. Serve at room temperature with whipped cream.

Pumpkin Pie
Prepare a single crust pie shell and chill well while you prepare the pie filling. Makes one deep dish 9″ or 10″ pie.

2 cups cooked, pureed pumpkin
1 teaspoon cloves
4 eggs, beaten separately
1 tablesoon flour
1 cup sugar
2 tablespoons butter
1 teaspoon cinnamon
1 cup evaporated milk
1 teaspoon ginger
1 teaspoon salt

Laura Watson is the mother of regular “Foodnatic” columnist Brendan Watson. He turned the column over to his mother this week because she is a true Thanksgiving expert. Laura is a first-time newspaper columnist, part-time pre-school teacher, a great chef and mother from Chicago, IL.

All Male, All Nude, All the Time

Monday, November 24th, 2003 | Melissa Langdon
Bernell Dorrough

Many know the childish glee accompanied with visiting the City Museum, the hearty fulfillment of cheese fries and bowling at Tropicana lanes, or the nostalgic anxiety of trying to roller skate or ice skate. For those seeking greater thrills and less physical exertion, though, one place offers a risqu‚ kind of entertainment for an off-campus weekend outing. Boxers ‘n Briefs is not just a strip club. In Boxers ‘n Briefs, you can leave your troubles outside. So, life is disappointing? Forget it. In here, life is beautiful. The men are beautiful. Even the deejay is beautiful. Beyond the sterile entry room, where a larger than average forty-year-old man bids you a happy viewing, lies a room full of men vying to arouse you, or at least arouse some sort of reaction in you. The following events took place on an unspecified night with a small group of Washington University students.

Upon entering the performance room we immediately noticed a dancer performing a special pole dance off to the right, while his member also swayed to the music. After that expected but still spontaneous moment of shock, the realization soon hit that the music the dancer so erotically moved to was none other than that of Femme Fatale (one of the evening’s karaoke entertainers) snapping and clapping to “Mambo Italiano.” The drag queens came out for a special night at B ‘n B to demonstrate their amazing karaoke skills and their self-important flare for fashion otherwise relegated to the dark corners of Wet Seal and Delia’s.

After quickly seating ourselves a safe distance from the stage, the group watched as the night’s host entered the stage. This sparkling beauty, decked out in a one piece jumpsuit, strutted out with a microphone in hand to speak her first great insight of the evening: “Let me tell you, I’m so uncomfortable with this nine inch dick taped back and sticking into my ass.” Such words are rarely spoken when introducing oneself to an audience, but considering the surroundings, the Mistress of Ceremonies, Taylor DeMornee, did so with a certain grace. On stage Mistress DeMornee quipped about the intricacies of her costume and the delightfulness of the male physique, while having as great of a penchant for the word “bitch” as many Wash U students have for “sketchy.”

The attention of the group soon wandered elsewhere to survey the other guests. At the table nearest to the stage, with a vodka tonic and a pack of Marlboro Reds in hand, sat a middle-aged man sporting an orange, ribbed sweater courtesy of the Gap. He would have appeared to be an average man, save for his somewhat disturbing lazy eyes, $1 bills in hefty supply, and a fondness for a bald B ‘n B employee in hot pants with a likeness very similar to Gollum. Behind the sitting area near the bar strutted Dancers #2 and #3. During the course of the evening Dancer #3 managed to slither side to side while hanging from a horizontal pole like an asp waiting to attack its prey.

After a few more minutes of indiscernible banter, Mistress DeMornee hailed the next act in a roll of thunder as Cleopatra Rain stormed the stage. When it rains, it pours. When Cleopatra Rain (breaking the first rule of open-toed shoes by wearing them with nylons) danced, the crowd tumbled to the ground in utter amazement. Despite her fashion faux pas, the Queen of the Nile reaped the benefits of a flood of $1 bills, many coming from a current day carbon copy of Violet Beauregarde from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. Violet dressed in costume as an innocent angel with a tin pail of which no one could quite understand the purpose. The night was full of other interesting people competing in the costume contest: a Warlock no more evil than a professor at Hogwarts, a vampiress with what can safely be assumed as actual blood streaming down her chin, and an employee (who had the night off and no better place to go) dressed as white trash with a mullet wig.

The next performer, one Alana DeMornee, broke out on the stage with great zest and decisively one of the worst prom dresses ever made. But from the perspective of someone who overindulges in Bear Mart M&Ms on a nearly daily basis, I must say that slip of periwinkle and rhinestone was quite becoming on Alana. Of all the queens that night, Alana shined the brightest, owing both to her choice of apparel and her intensity put forth in mouthing the words to remarkable song stylings of Mariah Carey. After a few more rounds from each performer, the night wound to an end. Mistress DeMornee ended a splendid evening by passing out as many free passes to the club as possible, varying between one and six months based on how much she liked you as an audience member.

Once the group had collected enough passes, we left the world of cigarette fog and men in briefs for the sterile entryway with the forty-year-old host. Perhaps the most shocking event of the night occurred when we had the great privilege of seeing the performers, refreshingly exhausted, as they pulled off their wigs and flipped off their heels to reveal their everyday appearance. They bid their customary farewells to the other workers with indifference, for they would not be gone from B ‘n B for very long, and our group embarked on its return to campus. Boxers ‘N Briefs proved to be everything I hoped it to be: the pole dancing, the bitching of Mistress DeMornee, the somewhat disturbing fellow audience members, the angel with the mysterious tin pail, and all the others who ventured to B ‘n B that night. I only have one valid complaint about my experience in that I saw many men in briefs that night, but the boxers were nowhere to be seen. Although Boxers ‘N Briefs lives up to its reputation, it certainly does not live up to its name. To see Mistress DeMornee in action, see her every Sunday night for her variety show starting at 10:30 p.m. Otherwise, go on any other night of the week to experience the entertainment, the trauma, and absolute lack of eroticism that is Boxers ‘n Briefs.

Boxers ‘N Briefs open every day of the week except for Monday and is located in East St. Louis at 55 Four Corners Lane at Routes 13 & 157. For more information, visit the website at boxersnbriefs.com.

NFL Picks: Week 12

Friday, November 21st, 2003 | NFL Picks

Matthew Goldberg
Sports Editor

Outlook:
Arnold is now officially the Governator. Maybe he should start cleaning up California by kicking the Chargers out of the state. I mean, that way SoCal could just get an expansion team and start from scratch. Even the Texans, who have only been in the league two years, have a better record than the Chargers. The Chargers should be terminated.

Game of the Week: New York Giants at Tampa Bay
No Keyshawn. No magic. Two crappy teams on Monday Night Football, just what ABC wants.

Pankaj Chhabra
Sports Editor

Outlook:
If 49ers’ quarterback Tim Rattay is this year’s Marc Bulger, then that makes Jeff Garcia this season’s Kurt Warner. Fortunately for Garcia, he doesn’t have an ugly-ass, look-alike wife that calls sports radio stations to support her husband (read: alienate said husband from teammates).

Game of the Week: New Orleans at Philadelphia
I’m predicting an upset, baby! Yeah, D. McNabb’s been better of late, but the Eagles have no running game. Deuce McAllister will upstage Duce Staley & Co. as the Saints go marching into the playoff picture.

Joe Ciolli
Sports Editor

Outlook:
Welcome to Part Two of the William Green saga. A week after receiving a four-game suspension for marijuana use, the Browns’ running back was stabbed in the shoulder blade with a steak knife by his fianc‚e. Now the question here is which rehab should he start, physical therapy or drugs? With his girl out of the picture, it’s no longer a “joint” decision!

Game of the Week: New York Giants at Tampa Bay
With Keyshawn Johnson on the shelf for the rest of the year, the Bucs will lose their advantage in the trash-talking department. Oh wait, they play football too. In that case, they should be fine.

Ashley Malnove
Sports Designer

Outlook:
Oh, it’s that time of year again. It’s time for Thanksgiving. Time to make some awesome stuffing with everything but the kitchen sink in it. And pumpkin pie. Yummy. Oh yeah, there’s football on TV. Miami at Dallas. I may even watch it.

Game of the Week: Jacksonville at New York
Although New York is probably a much better city all around than J-ville, I’ll go with the Jags. I can’t make too much fun of JAX though, considering I’ll be there for Thanksgiving. At least it will be warmer than the good old STL.

Lesley McCullough
Cornerstone Tech. Coordinator

Outlook:
Keyshawn will now be watching from the Tampa Bay bench for the remainder of the season. All I have to say is, it’s about time they put a stop to his antics. More power to Parcells if he willingly picks up the problem.

Game of the Week: Tennessee vs. Atlanta
Although their six-game streak of scoring thirty or more points was snapped by Jacksonville last week, I expect McNair and the Titans to return to form against a Vick-less Atlanta squad that has yet to win a game at home this season.