Sororities embrace diversity
To the Editor:
As members of sororities, we acknowledge the fact that Greek life on this campus is not as diverse as it could be. We understand the biases that people have towards sororities, and the stigma that is
attached to them. The sorority system appears to be an exclusive and discriminating community. We would like to challenge this stereotype and make a concerted effort to extend ourselves to all women on this campus, embracing individuals of all races, ethnicities, social backgrounds, etc. As Rush Counselors it is our mission this year to make Rush 2002 an environment of acceptance and inclusiveness for all women. As it stands, the Greek system at WU is a clear source of segregation, which is a fact that we deeply regret. However, past legacies of prejudice do not need to determine the future. We hope if nothing else that this editorial opens up discussion about Greek life on this campus and how it can be changed. It is within our power as stu-ents to break down these stereotypes and make this year’s rush a positive community building experience that will bring together all the exceptional women on this campus.
The Rho Chis and Panhel, 2002
One side provokes another
To the Editor:
In Mayya Kawar’s letter to the editor she complains about Yoni Cohen’s one-sided view. Then she writes a one-sided rebuttal, drawing her information from a mixture of fact, fiction and semi-truths. One of her major points deals with the fact that Israel’s war efforts have not been defensive. Then she goes on to speak about specific incidents where Israeli militia attacked innocent civilians in the Arab village of DairYassin. She believes Dair Yassin occurred to persuade Palestinians to leave their homes. On a limited basis this might be true. Isolated incidents of Palestinians being massacred and ordered out of towns did exist. But the main reason for Palestinians leaving Israel (during 1948) involves Arab countries telling them to get out of the way as their armies were going to throw the Jews into the Mediterranean. Arab leaders admitted this after the War for Independence. Khaled al-`Azm, who served as Prime Minister of Syria in 1948 and 1949, wrote in his memoirs (published in Beirut, 1973), that among the reasons for the Arab failure in 1948 was “the call by the Arab Governments to the inhabitants of Palestine to evacuate it and to leave for the bordering Arab countries, after having sown terror among them… Since 1948 we have been demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But we ourselves are the ones who encouraged them to leave…We have brought destruction upon a million Arab refugees, by calling upon them and pleading with them to leave their land, their homes, their work and business…” Kawar complains about Israeli commando raids and assassination attempts. It appears from her article that Kawar is jealous of the Mossad. Perhaps she’s jealous that Israeli assassination attempts usually occur on people who commit acts of terror. Perhaps she feels that the Palestinian strategy of suicide bombers on discos, restaurants and other civilian public places is more professional. She also forgot to mention in her assassination talk the Palestinian killing of Tourism Minister Rechavam Ze’evy’s at a hotel.
She complained about Yoni Cohen’s one-sidedness, but she falls into the same trap. Kawar makes the comments that Jews must be willing to recognize the need for an equally viable Palestinian State; however the last time that the UN offered a Palestinian state and an Israeli state (in 1947), the Jews of the world accepted the terms and the Palestinians (as well as the Arab countries) roundly rejected the proposal. Arab approval of the plan-which included a UN run Jerusalem-would have resulted in the Arab communities of Israel not being displaced.
In another act of selective omission, Kawar focuses on the plight of Palestinian refugees since 1967 as well as the settlements that Israel has built since 1967. But the article never condemns Jordan or Egypt for the 19 years (1948-67) when Jordan controlled the West Bank and east Jerusalem, and Egypt controlled the Gaza Strip. During this time, the Arab states never offered self-determination to their Palestinian brethren – and kept them wallowing in poverty camps. Regardless of this I agree with Kawar, that the extremist views from both sides are what keep the peace process from succeeding. There will be a Palestinian state.
But rocks, suicide bombers, and armed rebellion will not help public opinion as now people think of the Palestinian as promoting terror.
David Douglas
Olin School of Business
Class of 2003