Tell us about yourself! Take the 2018 Diversity On Campus Survey

Staff Editorial: Student input a must for enviro major

Last Wednesday’s town hall forum regarding the University’s environmental studies program highlights the increased concerns of students and faculty about the program’s future. The forum came on the heels of a letter that four environmental studies majors submitted in February to James McLeod, vice chancellor of students, calling for more interdisciplinary courses and the eventual evolution of the program into an academic department.

However, recent developments make us wonder: Will the program lose funding or be eliminated all together? McLeod and other deans have not announced specific changes, though the University’s recent economic troubles and the upcoming departures of three professors within the program compel us to wonder if cuts are imminent. With the program’s structure currently “under review,” we appreciate the willingness of administrators to listen to students. We hope the University takes this opportunity to evaluate and advance environmental studies at Wash. U.

A recent and positive trend among colleges nationwide is the increasing availability of interdisciplinary programs—a trend that the environmental studies program furthers. Environmental studies incorporates not only biology and chemistry, but also engineering, economics and political science. This amalgam of subjects offers students multiple foundations for futures in academic research, public policy or entrepreneurship. It allows students to broaden their ability to think across a spectrum of issues and perspectives, which we feel is the ultimate goal of a liberal arts education.

What should Wash. U. do to the environmental studies program?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Without a strong environmental studies program, the University would risk denying undergraduates adequate preparation for major emerging career fields that pertain to the environment. Studying the environment will only become more important as the United States economy shifts toward an emphasis on so-called green jobs, and as both the public and private sector become more concerned with the environmental implications of business and politics, the demand for scholarly research in ecology and related fields will only increase.

Wash. U. has acknowledged this demand, responding with a minor in environmental engineering, an emphasis on sustainable architecture and consistent support of the Pathfinder Program in Environmental Sustainability. The University has also augmented its reputation as an environmentally friendly campus with a recently published sustainability plan and vigorous support of Proposition A, a local tax benefiting public transportation.

Yet it would be odd for administrators to follow these moves with cutbacks to the environmental studies program. Shrinking or eliminating it would go against the popularity of the major and minor among the student body and send a conflicting message about Wash. U.’s commitment to environmental and sustainability issues. A better option would be to strengthen the environmental studies program. We ask the University to respond to the concerns of students and faculty with specific changes that will expand the program and make it even more successful.

  • Tedward Erker

    The poll is incomplete. What about an option to strengthen the program as a program? The only positive choice is to “expand enst into a department”, but there are likely other pro-enst opinons out there like simply increasing courses and faculty.

  • Stan

    Like how “Reduce the number of faculty and courses” has negative one percent of the votes on that poll. I haven’t taken stats, but that seems inaccurate.

  • Why oh why was there no discussion of adding a humanities track to environmental studies, more urgent then ever now that environmental philosophy and ethics professor Clare Palmer is leaving? Why were the students defending only the status quo (let’s keep the social science track!) instead of demanding even more and better?

    I was very very happy to see Dean Jim McLeod back in top form after cancer therapy, and I gave him two thumbs up! Thanks for listening. Thanks for supporting academic freedom, especially the right of faculty to teach our courses the way we see fit, after approval by the curriculum committee. This right will always be threatened unless vigorously defended.