Archive for April, 2004

The quick and the dead

Friday, April 30th, 2004 | Brian Schroeder

I’m glad I invested in a pair of asbestos boxers because I plan on starting a flame war with this column. Two weeks ago I received an unusual email that outlined Washington University’s position on the carrying of concealed handguns (CC). I was pleasantly surprised to find out that a ruling had been handed down and that Missouri had become the 35th “shall issue” state, meaning that the state is required to issue qualified citizens a license. Ten other states have limited issue laws and five states do not allow CC.

The wording of the law in Missouri, as well as most of the 35 “shall issue” states, prohibits CC in most public facilities, such as schools, bars, government owned buildings, arenas and any private property where the owner does not wish to allow CC. A lot of these places are places where one can expect a reasonable amount of protection from security guards or police officers. Some of these places are not, but are not very appropriate places for firearms, such as the pool, church or your grandmother’s nursing home. Overall I am pleased with the wording of the law, so I am not going to complain about that. What I am unhappy with is the position that the University has taken.

I know that very few people read the Friday edition of StudLife, but probably even fewer of you have read the University’s official position, so maybe this will be informative. Even I don’t like learning things on Friday, but this won’t be very painful, so play along. The revised University policy prohibits the possession, storage or display of any firearm, loaded or unloaded, on University owned, leased, or rented property. This also includes vehicles parked on University property. While stowing a firearm in your vehicle while parked on campus would not be a criminal violation, unlike violating the previous rules, it is against University code and frowned upon.

My biggest problem with the policy involves the carrying a concealed handgun on University property. The University has the leeway to prohibit firearms in buildings on campus without prohibiting them on the entire campus. This issue can arise, for example, when students are commuting between the campus and off campus property.

Increasing reports of crimes committed against students on or near the University are unsettling to me. In Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981), D.C.’s highest court stated that it is a “fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.” That isn’t the only case to set that precedent, but the wording of the judge’s opinion is pretty scary, so I decided to quote it. Most of these cases involve female victims of violent crimes, so take notice ladies. It is a sad fact, but it is still true.

If I want to walk a friend home from an on campus party late at night, I would like to be able to take advantage of the law of the State of Missouri, and to a certain extent my Constitutional right, and carry a firearm. 99% of the time it won’t be needed, but that also means that 99% of the time nothing is going to happen anyway, including accidentally shooting my girlfriend’s baby while “cleaning” my gun in between taking hits off my crack pipe, which actually happened once (not to me). That 1% of the time that we are in the wrong place at the wrong time, a firearm could mean the difference between a bad night and an even worse one.

My “solution,” if you will, would be to introduce a program with WUPD that would require additional training or at least some form of cooperation with students and faculty who hold CC licenses and wish to have a restricted form of CC ability while on University property. Accidental shootings would be a statistical fluke considering the number of people who would take advantage of this program. The people we really need to worry about are the ones who already carry weapons with no regard for the law, not educated citizens who wish to exercise a right granted to them by the State of Missouri. Now that it’s possible to walk around at night with a firearm, who would walk around with a sign saying that you don’t have a gun? Chew on that.

Sigma Chi revisited

Friday, April 30th, 2004 | Staff Editorial

Editor’s note: The Editorial Board could not form a consensus regarding the recent events with Sigma Chi. In lieu of a staff editorial, two members of the Board wrote opposing arguments on this topic, and we also gathered opinions from other students around campus.


In considering what to do with Sigma Chi following the release of the videos, administrators said, “Previous violations will be considered.” What a long list they’ll have to sort through.

The Director of Greek Life expressed frustration with major problems stemming from Sigma Chi’s World War III party all the way back to 1999. There was an assault on Mar. 25, 2001, at the Sigma Chi house, following another party. Not a year later, they were cited for alcohol and safety violations, an illegal bonfire, and property damage. That same day, several members of the fraternity yelled rude and misogynistic remarks at female tennis players, including those on visiting teams. They also threw a dead squirrel onto the court. Finally, the administration just investigated and sanctioned Sigma Chi for an incident that “clearly looks like hazing;” two pledges were hospitalized for alcohol poisoning.

While the brothers embarrassed themselves with their filmed antics, the real trouble is that they congregated to discuss, in derogatory terms, their past sexual ‘conquests.’ And they enjoyed every graphic minute, judging from their whoops and laughs. What they actually said is too offensive to print, but the gossip was certainly misogynistic.

Ironically, the fraternity boasted about participating in “1 in 4” training just two days ago in a Student Life ad.

Unfortunately, the entire Greek community will be hurt by the actions of a lone fraternity. Sigma Chi strengthened the “Animal House” stereotype, which other Greek organizations have been actively fighting. Those chapters that uphold traditional Greek values like academic achievement, community service, and character development should denounce Sigma Chi. Doing so will improve the community’s perception of the Greek system.

Though the brothers have a right to say whatever they want, the University does not have to facilitate a culture of misogyny and reckless behavior. Unlike free speech, there is no right to a fraternity house.

At best, Sigma Chi is a public relations nightmare. At worst, it is a pervasive danger to students. The University should conduct a thorough investigation of Sigma Chi, taking into account their history, to determine if the chapter remains an asset to our community.


I don’t know what everyone else saw when they watched the tapes of the brotherhood event that Sigma Chi believed would stay private. I saw all of the tapes on the camera in addition to the ones posted online, and all I saw was a group of fraternity brothers having fun in the privacy of their own house. There are things on the tape that I wouldn’t say or do personally-I’ve never tried dunking my head in ice water and I probably never will, but that doesn’t take away the right of this group of men to do that if that’s how they choose to spend their free time.

Even sexist and graphic descriptions of women, while not acceptable in a more public setting or in the presence of women, does not shock me or even bother me that much; they were at a closed event in the confines of their house and they fully believed that no one else would ever hear or see these happenings. It is also certainly not uncommon for men-or women for that matter-to get together and discuss in detail their sexual experiences. The bottom line can be summarized as follows: maybe this behavior is unacceptable to certain people, but it was not meant for public consumption. Seeing as how no one was injured, no property was damaged, and aside from underage drinking, no actual laws were broken, there is absolutely no reason to punish Sigma Chi for this “evidence.”

Even knowing the content of these tapes, I feel sympathy for Sigma Chi. A huge component of the nature of fraternities involves a lot of secrecy. I think that Sigma Chi has been embarrassed enough and that their humiliation should end here.

I’m willing to admit that I am friends with several members of Sigma Chi. I think this stance is an important one, however. I think one problem with these videos and the uprising in response is that it creates a situation where people make judgments about an entire group based on the actions of a few people on one night under the influence of a lot of alcohol.

All Real Numbers

Friday, April 30th, 2004 | David Freeman
David Freeman

How the mighty have fallen

Friday, April 30th, 2004 | Matt Simonton
leeson.ohje.de

Letdown isn’t the right word. How about “debacle,” or “disaster” or “worst show that I’ve ever attended, and that includes Peter Frampton when he opened for Lynyrd Skynyrd in ’98?” Yeah, that about sums up the Fall show. Not only was singer Mark E. Smith completely juiced and incoherent, but the show didn’t start until 12:15, roughly four hours after I’d showed up to see the mediocre opening bands. On some level, one has to expect Smith to be slightly unintelligible, since that’s part of his appeal, but surely drunken stumbling and feeble geriatric gestures do not fall into his accepted practices. Smith screwed the fans, he screwed his own bandmates, and he certainly screwed the 25-year post-punk legacy he helped to create. So screw you, Mark E. Smith.

But to start from the beginning, Lost to Metric kicked off the evening and quickly shattered the eardrums of anyone standing too close. The bass drum was so loud and resounding, in fact, that the vibrations were making my stomach feel queasy. They weren’t a bad act, though, churning out some math-rock numbers at ear-splitting decibel levels. Local act Tone Rodent followed, and while this wasn’t as awful as had been promised by my Cadenza cohort, who was now in attendance with a half-quart can of Stag in hand, it was still largely unacceptable, as the quintet insisted on burying their forgettable songs with layers of noise a la Sonic Youth. Rounding out the unending procession of opening bands was Low Flying Owls, a decent four-piece band that recalled the psychedelic feedback rock of Black Rebel Motorcycle Club and the Stratford 4. The Owls knew how to keep it poppy, too, opting for simple drum beats and some playful keyboard segments. Overall, a perfectly adequate opening act.

Then the pain began. The audience listened impatiently to almost the entirety of the Fall’s “This Nation’s Saving Grace,” with the band members nowhere in sight. Eventually, one of the Creepy Crawl staff started setting up the drums, but the band was still alarmingly absent. Only a frosty caffeinated beverage was keeping me on my feet at this point, having endured four smoky, godforsaken hours in the Creepy Crawl. Finally, the Fall rushed onstage, hastily picked up their instruments, and started bashing out “Open the Boxoctosis,” from their latest album. Smith was the last to take the stage, and the crowd cheered the (barely) living legend.

I was expecting a sad sack, but damn, the man is looking practically mummified these days. He feebly smacked his thin lips every now and then and tried in vain to keep up with some crumpled lyrics sheets. He sang every other line of the songs, forgetting or just neglecting to sing half the lyrics. He was still recovering from a broken hip, so at times he slumped in a chair behind a table, at others he lurched about the stage, tossing around microphones and fiddling with his bandmates’ amps. The poor young twentysomethings backing him were forced to play through the songs regardless of whether he sang or not, and at times you could almost hear their sighs and see their looks of exasperation. The band made it through five or six songs, pounding out a wall of sound while Smith continued his drunken, possibly painkiller-induced shenanigans. Finally, he had chucked around so many mics that the band had to take a five-minute break. A jarring synthesizer line repeated ad nauseam during this wonderful interlude.

As if things couldn’t get any more weird and confusing, when the band returned, some other dude grabbed the mic and the lyrics sheet and started barking out the words in Smith’s place. Finally, Smith resumed his place and “led” the band through crappy versions of “Mere Pseud. Mag. Ed” and “Mr. Pharmacist,” which was practically instrumental. The band again stormed off the stage, but Smith must have died at this point or something, because the house lights came up and the PA music started. The fans, whose reactions during the night had ranged from optimistic dancing to bewilderment to frustration, now filed out of the venue in a smoldering rage. One guy shouted, “I’m burning off my tattoo!” Yeah, if I had a Fall tattoo, I’d feel inclined to take a soldering iron to it as well. I returned to the South 40 crushed, unable to shake the image of Smith’s toothless, pathetic countenance. What’s worse, I can’t listen to my Fall albums-which are actually, you know, good-without remembering that awful, awful excuse for a concert. Oh, how the mighty have fallen!

Celluloid Paralysis

Friday, April 30th, 2004 | Tyler Weaver

Kathy Drury. I’ve gotta thank you first, as it’s the final column of the year, and there wouldn’t be a column period if you hadn’t pestered the next person on this list to shift her morning-addled ass into gear and introduce me through the proper channels. This actually makes two years in a row that you’ve been shouted-out in a culminatory column, which amounts to about two times more than any other professor’s been represented at all (as best I can remember), so be sure to bear in mind that you’re particularly special, to both me and…

Jess Minnen. Oh, Jess, my graduating friend, my original partner in column crime here at the new, slightly bastardized within-Student-Life Cadenza. I still recall the first party of yours to which I was offered attendance, where I met the section’s editor-in-chief and drank myself so stupid that it’s become the stuff of amongst-friends lore. “Beer before liquor” never seemed so accurate, and yet it was the slightly peaked beginning of a rather beautiful friendship. Don’t wander too far, girl; it just wouldn’t be the same if, on our designated tavern nights, I couldn’t share a drink with both you and…

Travis Petersen. Said section editor-in-chief, now formerly so, having recently shifted over to the editorial point of Cadenza’s musical battering ram. It’s been a hell of a year, in our pages and otherwise, and of late it’s only been more hellified, what with those attacks on “the man,” and those pretty girls making graves. Of all the cats I’ve encountered in the course of writing for this rag, it’s with you that I’ve shared the most wry glances and hilarious observations, a tendency I hope continues for the foreseeable future and beyond. You’ve been a master editor, but even better a new friend. As the li’l man said, “rep yo’ city,” and rep you did; the Dub-G couldn’t have a finer ambassador than you…well, you and…

Robyn d’Avignon. Secretary/Vice President/Official Co-Organizer of Choir/Co-Op/The World Entire/A Reasonable Region of my Heart. Don’t take that the wrong way-although I could do a whole lot worse for people to be taken the wrong way about-just take it that you inspire me, wryly, whimsically, wonderfully, to be better. I believe in goodbyes, but you don’t, so lucky me. I’m going to spend a considerable amount of time next year missing you…you and…

Kaitlin Eckenroth. I can’t even remember what damn country in which you’re going to be whiling away your autumn, but-needless to say-it’s not likely to be one that will appreciate you, in all your busy-fied, architecture-obsessed, chicly-bespectacled flavor, as much as I do. You’re one of countless guinea pigs to whom I’ve at times subjected this column in primitive form, but you’re only one of two readers to ever take the time afterwards to write back. I don’t even know who the other one is (some trick complaining about Borders), but you’re my friend and you made me think, like you always do. I’m never gonna dig “The Lord of the Rings,” but I dig you, and that’s close enough. Which leaves me without a transition to…

Jeff Smith, Bill Paul, Rich Chapman, Pier Marton and the entirety of the film department, with which I’ve only further developed my involvement this year, and to whom (proper syntax and word order be damned) I’m indebted for a career of invaluable filmic instruction. You’re each insanely worthwhile in your own indelible ways, and if/when I ever manage to score that big-money distribution deal, you can bet on the sizable donation I’ll be shipping back here (along with a signed movie poster to replace that God-awful “Snow Falling On Cedars” ridiculousness in the office…the office manned, of course, by…

Lori Turner, from whom I’ll request a second to close my parentheses). My most avid supporter, my most supportive reader, the most accessible necessity a department could hope to have. A major full of students owes their organization to you, and I owe similarly a healthy portion of my column self-confidence. There’ll be plenty of visits in the future, no doubt, with equipment to be out-checked and papers to be in-turned, but-let’s be honest-it’s not like I ever need a reason. Which reminds me…

Matt Simonton. For no reason other than a willingness to put up with my sensitive writerly persnicketiness, which makes it sound like I don’t know you’re a groove-sweet editor to have at the helm, which you most certainly are. With the help of lovely Melissa Langdon, whom I’m only now starting to know (Mel- Word.), you’re going to exercise a complete mastery of the editorial art. That, and the parties are still going to be sweet. And, speaking of big gatherings of people who don’t necessarily know each other…

All the non-Wash. U. people to whom I’m indebted, for reading this column preliminarily or otherwise, but whom I’m leaving out in name because they don’t actually go here. No offense. You know I’ve got love, but I don’t have much space left so I’ve gotta get to…

Anita Rohira, with whom I haven’t spent nearly enough time. Jessi Stein, who needs to get back immediately from “the mystic East.” Beth Leonhardt, because ditto. That girl Sara from both Ohio and Ontario, for proving once and for all that geographical soulmates do exist. Michelle Repice, for having a last name worth repeating. Sam Caplan, Fernando Castro, Erin Chesnut and Cory Coleman, the absolute best neighbors any group of hardly-misfits could ever in any imaginable realm hope for, and I’m including Michelle Branch in any number of possibilities. Of course, James and Steve, because I don’t even need to say so. Table 17, in all its masterful trivia glory. Kristin Balzer, for giving me someone to write around. Anybody I’m forgetting, because I’m a big dolt for doing so. And you, the one reading this very sentence, for making it this far, or as far as you managed to get. Thanks for reading. See you next year.

Stroking the Pageant ’til it purrs

Friday, April 30th, 2004 | Travis Petersen
cclive.nl

The Pageant was completely and utterly packed for the Strokes’ sold out appearance Tuesday night. After an unsatisfactory set from the Raveonettes, a forty-minute wait during set-up and sound check left the place buzzing, sweating and impatiently sipping over-priced drinks as backwards-baseball-cap-wearing dude-bros and their clubby clothes-dressed honeys jockeyed for place with rail-thin hipsters and their asymmetrical haircuts.

Relegated to the balcony because of late arrival and stuck behind the tallest girl to ever live, I was sure I was in for a disappointing evening. But as the lights went down and the five nattily dressed members of the Strokes calmly took the stage, their presences illuminated by the shadows cast from lit cigarettes, the unpleasant nature of the crowdedness seemed to vanish. The opening bass riff of “Reptilia,” from the latest album, “Room on Fire,” signaled the beginning of the show, and poseurs were removed from their hip trances as strobe lights blinded the audience.

The first uncontrollable ovation came long before the end of that first song, as all instruments dropped out but for the jittery guitar and the crowd went nuts. After the song, the screaming had to subside because the band followed the opening number with their most well-known hit song, “Last Nite.” The audience sing-along nearly drowned out vocalist Julian Casablancas’ artfully disaffected croon, but nothing could extinguish the fire of Albert Hammond’s spasmodic guitar solo.

Since the last time I had seen them-on the tour supporting the release of their first album “Is This It?”-the Strokes have morphed from an indie-style band playing small clubs and barely moving onstage to an arena rock force to be reckoned with. Casablancas, instead of hiding behind his hands and having to hold himself upright on the microphone stand because of the drunken wobbles, had some seemingly rehearsed banter and a calmer presence as he stalked the stage. Albert Hammond and drummer Fabrizio Moretti are both born rock stars, and have too much fun onstage to have time for ultra-cool poses. Though they stand stock still second guitarist Nick Valensi and bassist Nikolai Fraiture look the part. The lights were amazing and the sound was note perfect-every guitar strum and drumbeat was crystal clear. And nearly every song had a point where certain instruments would drop out, prompting ecstatic roars from the crowd.

What seemed to be lost in all of this, though, was a slight sense of the rock and roll spirit. A band whose songs are as intimate as the Strokes’ are wouldn’t be playing such a huge venue in a perfect world. Some of the connection from those earlier shows was lost, and it took the bigger, more bombastic, louder numbers to regain that. “NYC Cops” was a good example of this, and probably the best cut they played the whole night-though it wasn’t on the US release of “Is This It?” the crowd sure seemed to know it, and its punky blasts got the floor moving back to front and side to side.

For most of the set, they alternated songs from “Room on Fire” and the debut album and closed with their usual set-ender, “Take It or Leave It.” The house lights came up, indicating there’d be no encore. The Strokes are a very good band, and they’re getting very popular. Hopefully, though, that doesn’t mean the next time we get an opportunity to see them it’ll be at an even larger, more impersonal venue. It’s hard to set an entire room on fire when it’s that big.

Much more, and this is the snob in me coming out . . . it’s disappointing to go to a concert and be standing around people who don’t appear to enjoy any music, much less the music being played at the particular show. As my compatriots stupidly danced our white asses off, we were eyed incredulously by people who were obviously too cool for fun. Previous Strokes shows in smaller venues weren’t like that. Everyone was there for the band rather than the social event status of: “Dude, we’re goin’ to the Strokes show,” “Aw, sweet dude, you got another ticket, I think I’ll bring Megan . . . maybe she’ll let me tap that cuz I think she likes that one song they played on the radio.”

But that’s the dilemma of loving a band that gets popular. And I hope they continue to be-because, no matter how selfish I might be, everyone needs to hear the Strokes’ rock and roll renaissance. If that means I might not be able to see for the whole show, then so be it.

AC to host Fencing Championships

Wednesday, April 28th, 2004 | Joe Ciolli
Margaret Bauer

Looking for something to do on the weekend following this Friday’s WILD? Need a break from tiresome finals studying? If so, head over to the Athletic Complex this Saturday and Sunday for the 2004 Midwest Sectional Olympic Fencing Championships.

“We got the event this year due to a five-year rotation,” said Midwest Section Chairman and St. Louis Division Chairman Bruce Sikes. “This was the year for St. Louis to host it.”

Featuring numerous nationally ranked competitors, the competition will highlight a talented crop of fencers from a five-state area. Those fortunate enough to come out on top after the two-day contest will advance to the United States Nationals this July in Charlotte, N.C.

“[We have] well over 100 competitors and our expectations are to have one of the highest quality tournaments in terms of how it’s run and the competition that’s there,” said Sikes. “A good number of nationally ranked fencers will be at the tournament. We’re hosting a lot of top-ranked competitors, predominantly from the Chicago area and Minnesota.”

This weekend’s competition will showcase three events: the ep‚e, foil and saber. Divided up by age, the members of the field will vie for a spot at Nationals in either the Senior or Under-19 group. In preliminary pool play the fencers will try to rack up five points on their opponent, while this number increases to 15 in later-round direct elimination play.

Throughout the course of the foil contest, competitors will be armed with a light-weight, flexible blade this is around 35 inches in length. In order to score a point, the fencers must hit their opponents in the region between the shoulders and the groin. Competitors in the ep‚e section of the Championships will fight with weapons of similar length but heavier weight and stiffer blades. Additionally, the ep‚e contest will count hits to any part of the body.

Varying a bit from the foil and ep‚e is the saber competition. Resembling a modern version of the slashing cavalry sword, the saber is used as not only a thrusting weapon but also one used for cutting. Fencers in the saber division wear more heavily protected equipment since the head is also a valid scoring area.

In terms of who advances to Nationals, the tournament committee has a pre-determined method in place.

“This [competition] is a qualifier for Division Three and Division Two, which generally sends the top 25 percentile,” said Sikes. “Also for Sectionals, Division One A runs on a formula based on the number of competitors present – it usually sends around ten fencers to Nationals. For the Under-19 division aimed toward college-aged people, the top 25 percent also applies.”

If all goes according to plan, the Fencing Championships should provide an exciting weekend at the Athletic Center. With top fencers from around the area competing for coveted spots at Nationals, the tournament should provide good reason for you to shake off your post-WILD fatigue and try watching a new sport.

2004 Midwest Sectional Olympic Fencing Championships

Event to watch: Men’s Epee

Competitors to watch:

  • Chris Hagen and Adam Soroko from the Minnesota Sport Club, fencing Men’s Epee. Hagen also competes in foil.
  • Alex Vongries from the Minnesota Sport Club fencing Men’s Sabre.ÿ
  • Rocco Toscani and Peter Truszkowski are both B03s from the Chicago Athletic Association Fencing Club.
  • Christine Dominick from the Illinois Fencers Club fencing Women’s Epee.
  • Carly Wells and Marijke Morich from the Chicago Athletic Association Fencing Club fencing Women’s Sabre.

Debate prep continues, volunteers needed

Wednesday, April 28th, 2004 | Kelly Donahue
Student Life Archives

As the academic year comes to a close, members of the Washington University community will keep working throughout the summer and fall to prepare the campus for the Oct. 8 presidential debates.

According to Steve Givens, assistant to the chancellor, the University’s preparation for the event continues to run efficiently without any major concerns.

“We are continuing to move ahead with the behind-the-scenes work within the [debate] committee,” said Givens. “The Career Center has already set up the process to get student volunteers, and Student Union is coming up with its own ways to be involved. We feel like we’re in great shape and everything is running smoothly.”

The Career Center is now accepting applications from University faculty, staff, and undergraduate and graduate students who are interested in volunteering their time before and during the Oct. 8 debate. Possible volunteer responsibilities include administrative support, leading tours of the facilities, ticket distribution, and ushering on the day of the debate. Approximately 200 applicants will be selected based on their level of interest, schedule availability and the quality of their submitted application essay. More details are available on the Career Center’s website.

Interested volunteers should not count on receiving access to the debate venue itself, as only a handful of positions may place workers near the action.

According to Melinda McAliney, intern specialist at the Career Center and the volunteer coordinator for the debates, ushers, credential checkers and those with media responsibilities are the most likely to have access to the venue-but it’s not a certainty.

While volunteer positions are open to a variety of members of the University community, students will be given priority in the selection process.

“This has been [the Career Center’s] philosophy in the past-to involve students and make [the event] as student-driven as possible-because we want to give students a part in making history,” said McAliney. “[Students] can look at this as a career-building opportunity, and we’re thrilled to be involved and have the chance to offer our expertise and service.”

Those interested in attending the actual debate will be able to register for the online lottery system for ticket distribution shortly after the beginning of the fall semester. Any student enrolled at the University as of Oct. 4, 2004, is eligible for lottery registration, but tickets’ availability to University students has not yet been determined.

In cooperation with national authorities, the University Police Department will also be taking various security precautions during the event. Access to Hilltop Campus and the South 40 during Oct. 7 and 8 will be restricted to students, faculty, staff and guests invited by the Chancellor or the Commission on Presidential Debates. Only vehicles with authorized University permits will be allowed to park on campus on those days.

A “Public Viewing Area” within sight of the debate venue will also be set aside for peaceful protests. The University is aware that organizations such as the Oct. 8 Coalition-an alliance of various student and local activist groups-are planning to hold demonstrations.

“I think [such protesting is] all part of the event,” said Givens. “We know [demonstrations] are the kind of things that will occur, and we will try to have an environment where those can happen. At the same time, the University has to make sure that the debate itself goes smoothly. [The Oct. 8 Coalition] is just making [its] views heard, and that’s really great.”

Student Union is also working on plans for a series of weekly forums that will take place in the months before and after the debate. “Educate Yourself: 2004” will consist of a panel discussion each week, led by various student groups, as well as follow-up events in which students can participate in order to increase their awareness of the issues at hand.

Sophomore David Ader, president of Student Union, said that the panels will serve as a vehicle for discussion of issues that are relevant during election time at a national level as well as on campus.

“We hope that [the program] will inspire thoughtful discussion on the issues,” said Ader. “We want to make students realizes how the issues being debated will affect them.”

New University Center construction pending

Wednesday, April 28th, 2004 | Pat Kennedy and Sarah Kliff
Student Life Archives

A new “University Center,” which will likely be built west of Mallinckrodt Student Center and south of Prince Hall, will be a long time in the making. Concerns and problems with the cost of the building’s construction have some members of the administration doubtful about the date of its groundbreaking, but Chancellor Mark Wrighton stated in an e-mail that construction will commence between July 1, 2005 and June 30, 2006.

“We have long held the view that we need to enhance space for student groups and student activities,” wrote Wrighton. “We made the decision to move forward with a start sometime in [fiscal year] 2006, [when] we will be in a position to pay for the projected new facilities and support the additional operating expenses.”

Wrighton also commented that a lack of space for many students groups has been one of the motivating factors in the new center’s construction.

“There are many student groups that do not have adequate space for their programs…The detailed space commitments have yet to be worked out, but we believe we will be in a good position to move forward on the detailed planning in the near future,” he wrote.

While details about the new center are still sparse, Director of Campus Life Jill Carnaghi is optimistic about the new building, and commented on its future purposes.

“There will be large spaces for students to come together,” Carnaghi said, adding that the building’s design should improve on Mallinckrodt’s layout.

She also expects that there will be “meeting rooms to enhance campus life” within the new University Center. Only general ideas are known at this point, however, as planning and construction are pending.

“Hopefully in the next six months we will have a meeting to get things jumpstarted,” said Carnaghi.

She added that a meeting to revisit plans and intentions for the building is scheduled for July 2005.

“We’ve always talked about it [University Center] as being very significant,” Carnaghi explained. “We want it to be a building used by everyone and owned by no one, and this makes its planning a little more difficult.”

Problems with the building’s costs and questions of payment are a main cause of the building’s delay. Fred Volkmann, vice chancellor of Public Affairs, commented that there are currently insufficient funds for the new student center. While there have been longstanding plans for a new building, he said, no permanent plans will be made until funds are secured.

Videos spark scrutiny of Sigma Chi

Wednesday, April 28th, 2004 | Jonathan Greenberger
Student Life

Reporting by Jonathan Greenberger, Liz Neukirch and Cory Schneider

New videos surfaced yesterday with images of Sigma Chi brothers and pledges engaged in what University officials have deemed “unacceptable” and “inappropriate” behavior. The videos appeared on the same day the fraternity received sanctions from the University as the outcome of a hazing investigation.

The videos, obtained early yesterday morning by Student Life, were allegedly shot by a member of Sigma Chi.

The Greek Life Office, which received copies of the videos yesterday from another fraternity, has opened an investigation into the incidents.

Most of the 28 videos and 31 photographs obtained by Student Life show fraternity brothers and pledges performing raucous, sexually-charged skits before their peers. During and after many of the skits, videos show the performers being pelted with beer cans and boxes by members of the audience.

Another video depicts a student dunking his head into a container of water filled with ice cubes, while others off-camera chant and count the seconds that the student’s head remains submerged. After about 20 seconds, when the student rises from the water, he is given a beer, which he proceeds to chug for approximately 10 more seconds. Photographs show numerous other students with their heads in the same ice-filled water.

While Director of Greek Life Karin Johnes stressed that the investigation into the incidents has just begun, she provided a written statement that characterized the videos as “distasteful” and “displaying inappropriate behavior that is unacceptable to the community.”

Although other conclusions have yet to be drawn, Johnes’ statement said that the University will consider revoking its recognition of the Sigma Chi chapter.

“Revocation is always a possibility in an investigation like this, but given the collective nature of what’s been happening, it’s even more so on the table now,” she said in an interview last night.

Rob Salyer, the fraternity’s alumni advisor, said the actions in the videos and photos “weren’t up to par with what” is expected by the University and him, but refused to comment further until an investigation is complete. Sigma Chi President Adam Wood and Vice President Justin Thompson both declined to speak about the matter.

The videos come on the heels of the University’s recently completed investigation into allegations of hazing at Sigma Chi. The focus of that investigation was two pledges who were transported to the hospital during the night of March 18-19. Sanctions for the fraternity that arose from this investigation were delivered to Sigma Chi last night, although Johnes and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Students Jill Carnaghi refused to describe the details of the penalties.

Carnaghi, contacted before she knew of the videos and photos, said that the just-completed investigation focused only on the events of March 18-19, treating them as isolated incidents.

Johnes said that the results of this last investigation will affect the outcome of the new one. “Previous violations will be considered,” she said.

One of the questions she will be asking as she looks into the events on the videos is the level of involvement by the fraternity’s officers.

“We’ll look at what role did the officers play,” she said, but added that regardless of how involved they were, “I believe officers are personally responsible for what happened.”

How the images were distributed is an open question. Sophomore Eric Triebe, who claimed responsibility for the videos and pictures in a written letter to Student Life, maintained that the media was “stolen” from his digital camera and then “unlawfully distributed.”

Johnes said that she obtained the videos from another fraternity troubled by Sigma Chi’s behavior.

“There are fraternities concerned by this. They realize that what one fraternity does affects us all,” she said.

Johnes claimed to have “a little bit” of concern that there will be retaliation against those responsible for distributing the digital files.

“I would hope that at this point [Sigma Chi] would take responsibility,” she said. “Taking up a rivalry with another fraternity is only denying responsibility, and they can’t blame anyone for this but themselves.”

The videos and photos were produced by a member of Sigma Chi, she added, so the possible distribution of the media was “a risk they entered into willingly.”


Online exclusive! See two of the videos:

Video obtained by Student Life of Sigma Chi brother dunking his head in ice water.

Video obtained by Student Life of cans and boxes hurled at dancing brothers and pledges.

Note: These short videos are in .mov format and may require Apple’s free Quicktime player.
Videos obtained by Student Life.