I’m glad I invested in a pair of asbestos boxers because I plan on starting a flame war with this column. Two weeks ago I received an unusual email that outlined Washington University’s position on the carrying of concealed handguns (CC). I was pleasantly surprised to find out that a ruling had been handed down and that Missouri had become the 35th “shall issue” state, meaning that the state is required to issue qualified citizens a license. Ten other states have limited issue laws and five states do not allow CC.
The wording of the law in Missouri, as well as most of the 35 “shall issue” states, prohibits CC in most public facilities, such as schools, bars, government owned buildings, arenas and any private property where the owner does not wish to allow CC. A lot of these places are places where one can expect a reasonable amount of protection from security guards or police officers. Some of these places are not, but are not very appropriate places for firearms, such as the pool, church or your grandmother’s nursing home. Overall I am pleased with the wording of the law, so I am not going to complain about that. What I am unhappy with is the position that the University has taken.
I know that very few people read the Friday edition of StudLife, but probably even fewer of you have read the University’s official position, so maybe this will be informative. Even I don’t like learning things on Friday, but this won’t be very painful, so play along. The revised University policy prohibits the possession, storage or display of any firearm, loaded or unloaded, on University owned, leased, or rented property. This also includes vehicles parked on University property. While stowing a firearm in your vehicle while parked on campus would not be a criminal violation, unlike violating the previous rules, it is against University code and frowned upon.
My biggest problem with the policy involves the carrying a concealed handgun on University property. The University has the leeway to prohibit firearms in buildings on campus without prohibiting them on the entire campus. This issue can arise, for example, when students are commuting between the campus and off campus property.
Increasing reports of crimes committed against students on or near the University are unsettling to me. In Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981), D.C.’s highest court stated that it is a “fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.” That isn’t the only case to set that precedent, but the wording of the judge’s opinion is pretty scary, so I decided to quote it. Most of these cases involve female victims of violent crimes, so take notice ladies. It is a sad fact, but it is still true.
If I want to walk a friend home from an on campus party late at night, I would like to be able to take advantage of the law of the State of Missouri, and to a certain extent my Constitutional right, and carry a firearm. 99% of the time it won’t be needed, but that also means that 99% of the time nothing is going to happen anyway, including accidentally shooting my girlfriend’s baby while “cleaning” my gun in between taking hits off my crack pipe, which actually happened once (not to me). That 1% of the time that we are in the wrong place at the wrong time, a firearm could mean the difference between a bad night and an even worse one.
My “solution,” if you will, would be to introduce a program with WUPD that would require additional training or at least some form of cooperation with students and faculty who hold CC licenses and wish to have a restricted form of CC ability while on University property. Accidental shootings would be a statistical fluke considering the number of people who would take advantage of this program. The people we really need to worry about are the ones who already carry weapons with no regard for the law, not educated citizens who wish to exercise a right granted to them by the State of Missouri. Now that it’s possible to walk around at night with a firearm, who would walk around with a sign saying that you don’t have a gun? Chew on that.