Annabelle de St. MauricePeek within the dark den of the Woman’s Building, where Student Union goes about its business, and one can see our campus leadership going about its work in an active frenzy. As the academic year now passes into its second month, our leadership is indubitably doing things, but no one knows what those things are. After all campaign promises, in-your-face publicity of last year, and oaths of being in constant contact with those they represent, SU as of yet has been relatively invisible on campus.
A recurrent problem for WU’s student government over the years has been its inability to publicize the actions and changes that it has undertaken and put into affect. Outside of the month of March when SU elections take place, SU has been hard to hear from or to find out about without a Sherlock Holmes effort of deduction.
Although it is true that SU is currently in the process of implementing several new projects, few members of the student population seem to be aware of what it is doing or planning to do.
For example, the availability of the fence around Olin Library as an advertising space is a direct result of the actions of SU. But no one seems to know this. Granted, one of the panels on this fence advertises the fact that SU deserves the credit for its creation; however, the sign is not eye-catching and is easily passed over. Using the fence as advertising space is a commendable creation, but SU should try harder at promoting itself in this case.
Furthermore, SU has recently gone through an overhaul, and on Oct. 2, it will publicly unveil a brand new constitution that will better direct SU activities. Did you know that SU was revamping its constitution? Did you even know SU had a constitution? True, SU’s constitutional issues are primarily an internal affair, and it has yet to be completed, but do you not think that you, the student, should know what your leadership is doing for itself as well as the community?
Additionally, SU is completely redesigning its Web site (su.wustl.edu), which contains almost everything an individual would want to know about how SU is run, what they are doing, and future plans. The Web site contains easy links to every member of SU, which allows an easy means of finding out who the members of SU are and a means of getting in contact with them. Furthermore, the website also contains the minutes of the latest SU meetings and updates about newly passed resolutions and happenings within SU. In essence, the website is designed to be user-friendly and to encourage people to associate with the leadership.
But is this the best way for SU to get into contact with the student body?
It seems as though SU is undertaking many passive projects to get in touch with the student body, but in terms of actively getting out there and interacting with them, that time has passed-seeing as though it is no longer March, the time of elections.
SU has also recently implemented a new program known as At Your Service, in which members of the SU board randomly select 15 or 20 students from the general student body and take them to dinner. The dinners are 45 minutes long, and the point of this program is to talk with students that are unaware of SU programs and happenings.
As SU Treasurer Jonathon Frick states, “the point of this program is for us to interact with students on a less formal basis outside of forums.”
This project sounds like a good idea at first, but again, it is up to students to be able to have the time and to make the effort to attend. Rather than coming up with a way by which the leadership gets in contact with students, SU has made a program by which students must make the effort.
Therefore, though SU seems to be trying to get more involved with the everyday lives of students, it has done so in a passive manner that needs to be improved. Rather than forming systems by which students can come to them, it needs to go to the students. In addition, regarding the projects it has undertaken, it needs to actively make students more aware of what they are doing.
If SU was doing its job of informing students about themselves and their actions, would you have needed to read this editorial to find out about all the things they are doing? Probably not.
Annabelle de St. Maurice
Annabelle de St. Maurice