Archive for September, 2001

The dating game

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Yoni Cohen

A friend of mine recently told me she had given up: “I’ll adopt my kids.” She’s a cute, outgoing girl, but hasn’t been on a date in at least a year. She’s worried, disappointed, and sexually frustrated. Yet her situation is not unique, as many of my girl-and guy-friends complain day-in, day-out about their love lives, or lack thereof.
Entitled “Freshmen to Go on Date,” a Student Libel article last spring mocked Washington University’s hook-up culture. A recent study by the Independent Women’s Forum, a conservative women’s group, confirmed that nationally, college students frequently hook-up, but rarely date. As a freshman, I observed (and, dare I say, participated in) this phenomenon. But, at the time, I was not particularly concerned. After all, we were new here, out to meet people, explore our options, and determine what-and who-we’re interested in. Today, as an upperclassman, I have a little bit more wisdom-turns out juniors don’t date either-and a different perspective. Despite being a “shady frat guy,” I’ve had enough with Washington University’s nonexistent dating scene.
Why do few students commit to a relationship? More importantly, why do even fewer students commit-or ask one another-to go on a date? Girls and guys each offer separate explanations, generalizations really, for our culture, but both understanding and change must begin at the individual level. That means you.
In early August, while we worked out at a Boston-area sports club, a friend of mine expressed eager anticipation for his final year of college: “Senior girls are even easier than freshmen! They’re scared they won’t be able to find someone when they enter the `real-world.'” That may or may not be true (and there are those of you who probably can’t wait to find out) but, by all accounts, post-collegiate dating is rough. Nine-to-fivers aren’t afforded as many opportunities to meet people, and nowhere else will you find guys and girls as ready, willing or able. If you’ve ever been told to take advantage of college, the four-year (or in the case of my counterpart Corey Harris, five-year) party, realize dating should be as much a part of the experience as is doing stuff our parents said that we shouldn’t. Prioritize getting drunk behind getting busy.
Speaking of getting busy, I often hear students say they don’t have the time for a relationship. Indeed, a friend warned me today, “Yoni, you’re involved in too many activities. How can you expect to meet a girl? It takes time.” Caught up in classwork and pre-occupied with extracurriculars, they (previously we) claim to be too busy to devote significant time to a significant other. Perhaps. But maybe we accumulate these activities in response to our “single lives.” Unable to fill our time in the comfort of another, we create the “Emergency Support Team,” the “Progressive Action Coalition” and a “Student Union.” I believe that given the right person, each of us could, and would, make time.
But even students willing to admit they’d make time often qualify the statement. They’d make time for the right girl or the right guy. Problem is, around age twenty, few of us know who that right person is. And can you blame us? How am I supposed to know what to look for in a girl if I haven’t gone on enough dates to know which characteristics I desire in the first place? Maybe we ought to stop searching for the one we’ll take down the aisle and begin looking for someone to take to a movie tomorrow night.
Earlier in this column, I suggested we partake in student activities as a means of occupying our time in the absence of a girlfriend of boyfriend. If this is the case, then I am part of an organization that should be renamed “Students without Lives” and each of us staffers joined the paper so that we might write about the news rather than make it. For my sake, let’s hope that, at least with respect to the topic of this column, this will not be the case. Check back with me in a couple weeks. Or better yet, ask me to update you on my progress over dinner.

The image of alcohol-free events

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Laura Krotowski

As part of its “Men of Principle” initiative, the Alpha Iota chapter of Beta Theta Pi has voted to make all of its social events alcohol-free, a move made “in response to growing concerns over alcohol abuse, hazing and [the] irresponsible citizenry which plague the Greek system,” according to Beta’s press release. We support Beta’s initiative, as we feel it could result in some healthy reexamination of the purposes of the 11 fraternities on this campus: a chance to take inventory of the good and the bad.
The decision immediately raises the issue of whether, and if so, how, alcohol contributes to a negative stereotype of fraternities at WU. Although we do not doubt the benefits of fraternities for members of fraternities, such as the opportunity to participate in worthwhile community service and build life-long friendships, the strong majority of WU students are not members of fraternities. For the majority of students, especially for underclassmen who live on the South Forty, fraternities are a place to get drunk in an environment where alcohol is relatively easy to acquire and where administrators (or residential advisors) are not lurking. On a campus in which administrators are increasingly concerned with educating students about the harmful effects of binge drinking, and removing alcohol as the centerpiece of campus social life, fraternities are the unruly stepchild, a gross void in the image WU would like to present.
Parties and other social events help justify fraternities’ existence on campus, as they theoretically promote and facilitate social interaction among students. Alcohol, more than any other factor, provides the impetus for this interaction.
So how, given the present circumstances, will the Men of Principle initiative affect Beta’s position and role as a fraternity on WU’s campus? Will the social ties Beta now holds with students be severed for lack of alcohol at its social functions? While it is certainly too early to speculate on the long-term effects of this initiative, it goes without saying that Betas have their work cut out for them.
We support the Men of Principle initiative not so much because we believe that alcohol at social events is bad for fraternities, but because the lack of alcohol at social events will force fraternities like Beta to explain what is good about fraternities. Phi Delta Theta will go dry in 2000 and Sigma Nu plans to go dry if half of the fraternities on the row decide to get rid of alcohol. The role of alcohol at fraternity functions was never more subject to debate than it is right now.
Beta should, in formal conversation with the Interfraternity Council and in informal conversation with members of other fraternities, work to develop a plan for fraternities at WU. Even if Beta could become a haven devoid of the stereotypes that burden fraternities, as long as other students on fraternity row are drinking than going to Beta’s non-alcoholic events, the purpose of their initiative is null. If other fraternities agree that alcohol contributes to a negative image of fraternities, what are they doing about it?

Letters

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Laura Krotowski

WILD this semester means more
To the Editor:

The country is still attempting to recover from the national tragedy that occurred on September 11, 2001, a day that sent the country and this campus into turmoil. Now Americans everywhere are inquiring about how they can help. For example, many Washington University students volunteered to donate blood in an emergency blood drive-so many, in fact, that some were even turned away. Although blood drives are a vital necessity for our country at this time, many students on campus recognize that that is not the only way we can unite as a community to assuage this tragedy. Team 31 has presented our campus with an opportunity to make a difference in so many people’s lives by donating money to the American Red Cross. However, instead of embracing this opportunity, a vocal minority led by the editorial board of Student Life has done nothing but criticize Team 31 for this venture. We are surprised and saddened by the complaints elicited by the “no kegs” policy: the purpose of WILD this semester is so much more important than just another Friday night of beer kegs. WILD presents a wonderful opportunity for our community to show that we do care about our country’s tragedy. We find it upsetting that students cannot get past their selfishness for one day in order to envision a bigger picture. Team 31 needs our support and we intend to give it to them. We hope other students and student groups will recognize the greater good and do the same.

Women’s Programming Council

Students should take pride in dorms
To the Editor:

My family has been watching the new dorm construction at Big Bend and Millbrook for many months. Yesterday, only three weeks into the school year, my wife and I walked through the newly landscaped grounds between the beautiful buildings for the first time, but were disappointed to find broken beer and alcohol bottles, trash and cigarette butts, and patio furniture in disarray. We would have expected students and university personnel to take more pride in these wonderful buildings.

James L. Drexler

Staff Editorial: Students must know the decisionmakers

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Laura Krotowski

College students, at WU and elsewhere, must be informed of decisions-made by administrators and student groups alike-that affect their livelihood. All students have a right to question these decisions. But they need to know to whom they should address their concerns. Because of this, both student group leaders and administrators alike need to work harder to make their decision-making processes transparent to the university community.
Groups such as Team 31 and the Interfraternity Council-whose decisions and activities affect large numbers of students-often include administrative opinions in their decision-making. At times, administrative influence is particularly strident, as when Coordinator of Greek Life Karin Horstman effectively dictated the terms of the opening of Fraternity Row this fall. Third party vendors and restricted guest lists were not the preferences of the IFC; Horstman told fraternity leaders that if they did not institute these policies, there would be no opening of the Row.
The fraternities, however, and not Horstman, were left to confront the brunt of student response to this decision. Likewise, the leadership of Team 31 recently faced widespread criticism from students because kegs were banned at WILD. It remains unclear, however, what role both Team 31 and the administration had in making this decision. Were this information explicitly presented by Team 31 or the administration, criticism and praise could without doubt be levelled to the appropriate sources, and would also be a more nuanced, helpful criticism.
Three things must be made clear in every case: the players in the decision, the amount of influence each had in the decision, and the reasoning behind all sides in the decision. To acomplish this, students should be e-mailed en masse about new policies. Such an open atmosphere would only improve the students’ regard for the administration.
The manner in which Residential Life dealt with the alterations of the housing selection process last spring is an excellent example of the right way to go. The process was changed into a form students had never seen before, and Residential Life released a statement to students declaring why this must be so. Students then understood, followed, and critiqued the process in a much more informed and academic manner.
One-sided decisions and a restriction of student response are contrary to the atmosphere of intellectual debate we desire to foster and uphold on the campus of WU. Our students enjoy voicing their opinions, but when the players in a given decision are hidden, students’ arguments are misdirected and misinformed, and ultimately frustrating and useless for all concerned. The strongest policies are those that can withstand challenge.

Whom to call with concerns:
Student groups
Jill Carnaghi, assistant vice chancellor for students, director of campus life
Office of Student Activities, 935-5994
[email protected]

On-campus housing
Rob Wild, associate director of Residential Life
Office of Residential Life, 935-5050
[email protected]

Off-campus housing
Bart Talley, off-campus coordinator
935-7942
[email protected]

Police department
Don Strom, chief of police
935-5514
[email protected]

Greek life
Karin Horstman
Office of Student Activities, 935-5923
[email protected]

Students’ internet use monitored

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Laura Krotowski

According to WU technology administrators, student download activity is not monitored by the university. Instead, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) are responsible for reporting illegal file sharing, and both monitor student activity as part of their responsibilities.
This past month, however, Sony, not the MPAA or RIAA, became the first group to bring complaints before the university concerning illegal file sharing on campus.
According to Assistant Vice Chancellor of Technology Jan Weller, while “the [WU] network is used to access information on the internet and to provide people with a transport system that connects resources,” it is not WU’s responsibility to find those who are using the internet to download copyrighted material.
The MPAA and RIAA, however, monitor “peer-to-peer” file sharing tools, such as Napster and Gnutella. They find the IP addresses, internet configuration numbers unique for each user. The first two sets of numbers in all WU IP addresses are the same, so the groups are aware when a user is from the university.
If one of these groups discovered that a WU student had downloaded copyrighted material, they would contact Matt Arthur, assistant director of technology, who shuts down the user’s internet access.
“The first offense is an educational issue,” said Weller. The administration will not punish students who did not realize that downloading copyrighted material is illegal. If the students remove the items in question from their computers, Network Technology Services will restart their internet services.
“The first time you get caught sharing stuff is just a big inconveniencing slap on the wrist,” explained junior Brandon Woo, who was caught sharing movies last year.
However, the second offense brings a student before the judicial board.
Students are not commonly caught obtaining illegal material. Incidents occur about once per month.
According to Weller, there has been a significant increase in the amount of WU network activity over the past few years. This is true for schools across the U.S. The increase in internet traffic by students is tied to acquiring MP3’s and video files, making it difficult for network administrators to manage activity. However, the number of complaints from the MPAA and RIAA have not increased.
“In the highway available to us, you get a lane,” explained Weller. “There is only a finite amount of bandwidth that we provide to you. We want to make sure that you can send email and make sure that there’s space available to do so. We provide access for educational purposes-not solely for entertainment. We need a balance between the two.”
Though WU does not monitor the network itself, the university does keep track of the activity going on with regard to bandwidth and how people are using the internet.
“We prefer you to self-manage than to have us manage,” said Weller.
Additionally, the university does not monitor websites with an eye peeled for inappropriate or illegal material.
Upon encountering potentially objectionable material, “We look at whether it interferes with the University’s mission,” Weller explained. “Whether or not something is pornographic is subjective.”

Campus Briefs

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Jennifer Chen

Psych department to study WTC aftermath
Following the recent terrorist attacks, American researchers are collaborating in a study on the effects that large-scale events have on memory.
“We are interested in how memories form for highly significant events-what some have called ‘flashbulb memories,'” said Dr. Randy Buckner, associate professor of psychology at WU.
Yale, Harvard, Stanford and NYU, among others, are taking part in the yearlong study whose purpose is not limited to studying how “flashbulb memories” are formed, but also to research how location influences memory.
“Will individuals in New York be affected differently than individuals in the Midwest because of their proximity to the events?” Buckner asked.

SHAC spawns Safe Zones group

This fall, three students took up the leadership of Safe Zones, a group dedicated to ending discrimination and promoting awareness of gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender-queer issues. Safe Zones was formerly run through Student Health and Counseling Services, but the group is now operated completely by students.
According to junior Ben Witten, co-director of Safe Zones, the administration ran into difficulties when coordinating Safe Zones in the past because the professionals in charge of the project lacked sufficient time to devote.
The co-directors of Safe Zones described three tiers of involvement in the group. First, students, faculty and administrators can complete a 25-hour training period to become “educators,” those who can further instruct the group’s members and be available to students. Second, an 8-hour training period will grant “contact” status; that person is free and open to discuss GLBTQ issues with anyone. Finally, a three-hour training session grants “ally” status to those who show their support and acceptance of GLBTQ issues.
Safe Zones, a completely confidential gay-straight alliance group, has already been contacted by Residential Life, Uncle Joe’s, CORE, Lutheran Campus Ministries, the Catholic Students’ Center and Hillel to conduct training.
The first workshop training session is October 8 from 7 to 10 p.m. in Friedman Lounge. For more information, contact Witten (935-1765) or Langer (935-1085), or send an email to [email protected]
Cheap Lunch sells record number of pizzas
On Wednesday, September 26, EnCouncil served 250 pizzas at Cheap Lunch, breaking the record for highest number of pizzas ever sold at a Cheap Lunch, the weekly pizza sale held in Lopata Gallery.
This year, over the four Cheap Lunches so far, 850 pizzas were consumed by more than 2000 people.
EnCouncil attributed the growth of this campus wide event to an increase in publicity.
Cheap lunch was started around 10 years ago, but only in the past few years has the event grown to be campus wide. Each week, Cheap Lunch takes in just enough money to fund the next week’s gathering.
Last year, the highest number of pizzas served in one week was 220. Over the course of 26 cheap lunches, almost 14,000 people purchased over 4700 pizzas. On an average, 538 people consumed 181 pizzas each week.

Lockouts now cost $25

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Jennifer Chen

Residential Life decided to change the lockout fee from ten dollars last year, to $25 this year. The fee only applies during non-business hours.
According to Rob Wild, assistant director of Residential Life, the increased fee not only deters future lockouts but also encourages students to be more responsible with their keys. Wild said Residential Life increased the price after business hours because a staff member must escort a student to let them in and that this can take up to 20 minutes.
Currently, lockouts are free of charge Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Residential Life does not charge during these business hours because the staff does not have to leave the office.
All students need to do during office hours, should they forget their keys, is go to the Residential Life office, ask the staff for a temporary key, unlock their doors, retrieve their permanent keys, and return the temporary keys to the office.
During evening hours, Sunday through Thursday from 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Friday through Saturday from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., the $25 fee applies.
If students are unlucky enough to forget their keys in between evening and business hours , they can either wait for their roommates to return or call campus police, who will then page an RA. Only Residential Life Staff-including Residential College Directors and RAs-have the authority to retrieve keys and unlock doors.
The same rules apply to lockouts in Small Group Housing, Millbrook Apartments and Small Houses 1, 9 and 10. The university police responds to lockouts in these buildings during after-hours.
Several RAs said that the new policy is not only effective but teaches students to be more responsible for not only their keys, but also for their possessions in general. Although Maureen Winston, an RA on Mudd 2, has yet to have any residents lock themselves out, she said that students are adults and should therefore keep track of their keys.
Jessica Yokley, an RA on Lien 1, also pointed out that lockouts during off-hours are an inconvenience to RAs.
“Put yourself in your RA’s position. You are a student first of all, and so you have to take care of your student needs,” said Yokley. “Sometimes it’s frustrating when residents get locked out of their room at 3:30 in the morning, in the dead of winter, and you have to walk to Residential Life to get your key.”
Yet, some RAs question the effectiveness of the new policy and whether it promotes any additional responsibility. Anita Ravi, an RA on Shepley 2, said she believes that individuals are afraid to report it and more willing to wait it out than incur the $25 fee. Cristina Lopez, an RA on Beaumont 3, also found that the fee may not directly discourage lockouts.
Initially, it did not charge a lockout fee, but decided to do so after not seeing much improvement in lockout numbers. Wild pointed out that the fee is much cheaper than off-campus fees.
Off-campus locksmiths may charge as high as $100, said Wild.
Though it is too early to tell whether the fifteen-dollar price hike will further reduce the number of lockouts, Residential Life plans to review the policy.
Some students, like Dan Carneval, a freshman living in Danforth, considered the fee to be “no big deal.”
Many students said that the increase seemed arbitrary. Most students agreed that lockouts were mistakes that happen without the foresight of knowing that a penalty will be incurred during non-business hours.
“It’s not like people are doing it on purpose,” said Chai. “Students have a lot on their mind and they make mistakes.punishing them economically is not going to help.”

WUTV’s “Missionary Positions”

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Barbara Stein
Anthony Jacuzzi

Students worked behind the scenes during the live taping of “Missionary Positions.” The new show features host Alison Small and Rabbi Hyim Shafner, Father Gary Braun and Reverend Mike Kinman, who comment on love and sex. Panelists fielded questions that WU students e-mailed, phoned in or asked from the audience.

Students plan Millbrook goverment

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Barbara Stein

Students from the Millbrook student housing complex recently began work to provide a new representative government for residents.
Jill Lyon, the resident advisor for Millbrook 2, has been heavily involved in the creation of the new government, which is being organized by Lyon through Residential Life.
“[A government for Millbrook] will bring a sense of community and bring the ideas of the community to the forefront in order to be more effective for what it needs,” said Lyon.
In addition, Lyon said, the government will bring more structure to life in the apartments. With more student input for programming, the government will be able to bring more events to the north side of campus. Eventually, Jill Lyon and her peers hope to bring social events, such as the Residential College Olympics held on the South 40, to the north side of campus.
Although specific plans for the Millbrook government are still in development, the government most likely will be very similar to the hall councils of the South 40, with building representatives meeting approximately once a month, or that of the newly formed government for Small Group Housing.
The SGH Government has a President, Vice President, Secretary, 15 assembly representatives and 6 floor representatives, for the 420 people and 15 student groups residing there. SGH also has a Village Council that helps the small groups collaborate. The council consists of one representative from each student group living in the facility who is responsible for reporting the group’s activities.
Tim Lemphert, the residential college director for Millbrook, along with the resident advisor staff, will be in charge of the future elections for Millbrook.
Lyon hopes to hold an open discussion about the government with the rest of the community by the second week of October. This meeting will serve as a way for Lyon and others to determine overall student interest in the proposed body.
“If it ends up being too low of a response, we may have to reconsider what we’re doing, but I don’t think that will be a problem,” she said.
Despite the relatively low turnout at the recent SGH elections, Lyon, who was involved in the student council at Oxford University last semester, has so far received a positive response from those living in Millbrook.
“I think students do care because students have come to talk to me already, the second I mentioned it and other [resident advisors] told their students about it,” she said. “I think they’re seeing it as a chance to have a leadership role. It’s a commitment, but not an overwhelming commitment and for junior and seniors, time is a factor.”
Several students in Millbrook were unaware that the government is being planned and seemed relatively uninterested; however, others already have ideas for possible services the new government could provide.
“We were talking about possibly having a chef come here and teach people how to cook. There are a lot of different things you can do,” said Ken Weiner, a junior living in Millbrook.
Due to the significant increase in students living on the north side of campus since the addition of SGH and the renovation of old fraternity houses, some are also considering the development of a government body for the entirety of what is being called the “North 40.”
Lemphert said he believes that this residential area needs an umbrella organization that will combine representatives from each of the residences.
Clay Patty, the residential college director for SGH also said that “a government for the North 40 will be a great advantage in the future.”
However, Lemphert added that “each area should have an organization of its own” because, in his opinion, “each housing group has different issues.”

Bernell Dorrough contributed to this article.

Diversity at WU: Professors address faculty diversity

Friday, September 28th, 2001 | Aaron Johnson

While Washington University’s attempts to attract minority students are evident to most of the school’s patrons, the school’s concerted efforts to bring minorities into the ranks of its white male-dominated faculty attract less attention.
The problem of faculty diversity at WU, however, is a common concern of students and staff alike. Like most American institutions of higher learning, WU’s faculty and administration lack the levels of gender and racial diversity that the administration desires.
“My teachers have mostly been white men in their early sixties,” said senior Laurel Aschoft.
Despite the fact that those most WU administrators responsible for hiring new professors uniformly state that they see disadvantages in a homogeneous faculty, the problem remains,
“At a university, it is not ideal to have all the faculty representing one dominant group,” said Derek Hirst, chair of the department of history, which currently has 26 faculty members, of whom 16 are men and 19 are white. “When you get a more diverse bunch of faculty you get more critical perspectives, and you get more intellectual dynamism.”
Many professors say that intellectual discourse is one of the main reasons they desire a diverse faculty. Varied perspectives, they point out, aid them in their research, while also improving the overall quality of instruction that students receive.
Intellectual diversity isn’t dependent on physical diversity, but many say the two are closely related: a professor with a different cultural background may have important differences in perspective from the rest of his or her colleagues. Hiring committees acknowledge that these differences are valuable.
At WU, the faculty members themselves do most of the hiring of new faculty. In Arts and Sciences and Engineering, job searches are coordinated by department chairs, and in the business school by a committee. In the smaller schools, such as the School of Architecture, the dean plays a more active role in recruitment.

“We have been beating the bushes”

Hiring committees across the university say they have had difficulties hiring minority faculty, though the motivation is there to actively recruit such applicants.
“We have been beating the bushes but can’t find candidates for most of our positions,” said Henry Roediger, chair of the department of psychology. Roediger said in the past few years he has not found a qualified black candidate to offer a position.
Because there are fewer minority candidates, half the recruiting battle is getting a suitable number of applicants for a job.
“It entails doing a lot of advertising,” said Steven Krantz, chair of the department of mathematics. “It entails exploiting personal contacts. And it means that if we do find a suitable female or minority candidate, we really bend over backwards to bring them in. We just go out of our way to attract them.”
Offering special employment packages to a potential minority faculty member is not unusual, although the practice is common for non-minority faculty as well. These special packages can include everything from more money to a job offer for a spouse.
Stuart Greenbaum, dean of the school of business, rejected the idea that focusing on minorities was unfair to white male candidates.
“It’s a question of `What are you optimizing?'” he said. “Am I optimizing the utility of some particular white male candidate in Iowa or Nebraska? Is it more important for me to be indulgent of that individual, or is it more important for me to enrich my community, which is the Olin community?”
For Greenbaum, it’s not a tough choice.
“I have chosen to try to enrich the Olin community. That’s my first priority.”
But Krantz thinks the university has a different motive for minority recruitment.
“It’s obvious that one of the reasons the university administration wants diversity is [that] they’re under pressure from the government,” Krantz said. “We have a lot of government contracts here, and if we don’t play the game, they’re going to take them all away. So we have to do it, but it’s a good thing to do.”
Roediger, however, applauded the administration for their pro-diversity efforts.
“[WU] treats the faculty as well as anywhere I’ve been, and the support that I’ve had in trying to recruit people to this university has been outstanding,” Roediger said.

“We can’t recruit you if you don’t exist”

There are many theories as to why the faculty candidate base lacks qualified minority applicants. The most commonly voiced theory is that of the pipeline.
The number of minority students entering and exiting graduate school is proportional to the number of minority faculty applicants. There are relatively few minorities in graduate programs; therefore, the faculty applicant base lacks diversity.
Under this theory, there is no way schools can get minority faculty, no matter what they do.
“We can’t recruit you if you don’t exist,” said Rafia Zafar, chair of the department of African and Afro-American studies.
There are other reasons most minority undergraduates are staying away from a graduate student track. According to William Bechtel, chair of the philosophy department, philosophy majors often head to other professions, such as law, instead of graduate school because of the certainty of finding a job in those fields, relative to the job market in philosophy.
Krantz added that he thinks minorities are more likely to go to fields such as medicine that can have an affect on their particular group. Women also have to worry about having children.
“To be perfectly candid,” said Krantz, “I think women are more caring than men. Men are more career oriented, and [men] are willing to make allowances for kids and wives.”
This same pipeline problem existed 30 years ago for women, but that applicant pool has since grown, and the pipeline problem has been alleviated.
Though the pipeline is a popular explanation for the lack of minority faculty, some offer alternative theories.
“The problems women and faculty of color have with going to a school is the perception, if not the reality, of being a huckleberry in a bowl of milk,” said Zafar, quoting African-American educational reformer Booker T. Washington.
“Faculty of color tend to cluster in universities that have higher numbers of their ethnic groups, [because] they feel more comfortable, and they know the burden is going to be less,” said Zafar.
This burden Zafar described as “the black tax.” African-American faculty often bear the load of their race in that they are asked to serve on more committees, do more tenure reviews, and engage in other burdensome administrative tasks.
“If [people] have a question about race-whether or not it has anything to do with you or your field of interest-[they] want to talk to you. In many ways it’s incumbent on you to step up to the plate. On the other hand, it’s a lot of stress on faculty members.”
She compared the situation to that of a solitary male student in a women’s studies class. In the classroom, the male would be targeted more frequently as a source of opinion. Minority professors often encounter similar situations.
To alleviate the pressure, minority faculty often congregate at certain universities where their comfort level is higher.
“It’s kind of a catch 22,” said Roediger of hiring minority faculty. “They come and look around, and they don’t see a community of scholars that they would identify with, so they choose to go elsewhere.”
According to William Bechtel, the philosophy department has also had trouble recruiting minorities. He suggests that even the makeup of the student body affects how welcoming a school may feel to a faculty applicant.
Perhaps one of the biggest causes of recruiting problems is that minority applicants are in such high demand that they often choose the prestige of another school. Krantz mentioned schools such as Harvard and Princeton as competitors.
According to Zafar, African-American faculty are also hesitant about living in Missouri. Besides Missouri’s status as a former slave state, St. Louis is one of the top ten cities for residential segregation.
When minorities do go into research or teaching, they often find themselves at a disadvantage for promotions, added Zafar.

“It’s a long road to Tipparary”

The faculty diversity problem has a chicken-and-egg quality to it that makes new ideas and suggestions hard to find, since the blame can easily be shifted. Are there no minority faculty members because there aren’t any minority graduate students? Or no minority graduate students because there aren’t any minority faculty members as role models?
Despite the circuitous arguments, many have suggestions.
According to Zafar, administrators and faculty have already held many meetings brainstorming new ways to attract minorities. She said faculty chairs should be reminded at regular intervals that there is support and funding available for new hires, particularly new minority hires. She suggested the university consider “cluster hires,” in which a number of minority faculty are hired simultaneously.
Krantz supported more direct administrative efforts for increasing diversity.
“I would like to be more confident that if I had a really terrific female candidate, or a really terrific minority candidate, I could go to the dean, and he would be willing to put together a special package for that person. He does it, but there could be more.”
Additionally, Bechtel said there is a generational switch coming up soon, and many older faculty members will retire. This has the potential to open up numerous professor positions.
Zafar supported the idea of an administrative diversity position, but said that it should be raised to the upper levels of WU’s administration, where it would have control over all schools, graduate and undergraduate.

How would diversity change the atmosphere?

Many faculty members struggled with being asked what changes would happen to this campus if there were more minorities. Some said it was hard to visualize the changes that diversity would bring, but there was wide agreement that a more diverse faculty would help minority students succeed.
“One of the most important things a faculty member does is that he or she is a role model for what an educated person should be,” said Krantz. “And you don’t want to project the image that an educated person has to be male.” He added that many females appreciate female mentors, and minorities appreciate minority mentors.
Lacking a minority mentor is what drives away many minority students from a career in psychology, according to Roediger, who added that the psychology department does not have any black professors.
“[If] students [had] role models, then the students.could elect psychology as a career. Whereas now, we are not offering the African-American students someone that they can identify with,” Roediger said.
Having a diverse faculty would benefit students in other ways also, said Greenbaum. Prospective minority students would be more drawn to a campus with minority faculty, and having a diverse faculty-and a diverse atmosphere in general-would help prepare students for the world outside the WU bubble.
Olin School of Business boasts a number of international professors, which Greenbaum said is the result of a conscious project geared towards giving students experiences in dealing the people from around the world. He noted, however, that having an internationally diverse faculty was not enough; domestic minorities are necessary as well.
The need to have practice working in the real world with various minorities is one of Cynthia Weese’s primary motivations for seeking greater faculty diversity. When Weese, the current dean of the school of architecture, graduated from WU’s architecture school in 1962, she was the only female in her class.
Because she faced discrimination at various firms in the past, Weise said she tries her hardest to get a diverse faculty, though with a small school, the turnover rate makes the task difficult. Even with no African-American faculty members, she said she has had success. There are new female professors, and the freshmen class this year is 58 percent female.
The problem Weese faces is not isolated to architecture. Women rarely achieve tenured faculty positions across the university. According to Linda Nicholson, the director of the women’s studies department, though the department has made drastic improvements, they are not enough.
“I think there’s been grumbling among women faculty,” she said, but added that complaints will continue until the gender balance in the faculty is 50-50.
Some say the journey to a more diverse faculty has been somewhat successful so far. According to Roediger, there have been leaps and bounds in opportunities for women over the 40 years he has been in academia.
Despite the progress, Greenbaum said there is still much progress to be made.
“I would tell you it’s a long road to Tipparary,” he said, referring to a famous World War I song. “It’s a long way home, it’s a long journey.”