College Media Network

SAM loses on-campus housing

Chapter will keep university recognition

Puneet Kollipara and Ben Sales

News Editors

Print this article

Published: Friday, December 12, 2008

Updated: Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Correction Appended Below

Sigma Alpha Mu will no longer be able to make use of its house on Fraternity Row following a decision by Washington University administrators in the wake of a drug bust there on the last day of fall semester.

Sigma Alpha Mu (SAM) will, however, keep its recognition as a University fraternity.

The house of the University's chapter of SAM, known as the Phi chapter, sits at the far eastern end of Fraternity Row.

Administrators made the decision to expel SAM from the row within the week of the bust, according to SAM Phi Chapter President Adam Savaglio, a sophomore, who said that he was part of the decision-making process. The decision becomes effective at the beginning of spring semester.

"I met with Greek life and came to an agreement," he said. "We worked with them, with our national office."

SAM brothers who lived in the house last semester will move into Residential Life housing. Savaglio said that the chapter will wait before searching for another official residence.

"We'll have to take it semester by semester and see what happens," he said. "We've come to Greek Life with a plan but we're trying to rev our internal standards, make sure it doesn't happen again. Something like this is not tolerable."

The Washington University Police Department (WUPD) action that led to SAM losing its on-campus housing was confirmed by Assistant Vice Chancellor for Students Jill Carnaghi at the end of the fall semester, but she did not give further details.

WUPD's media log reported an arrest during the incident but did not give names of persons arrested.

Chief of Police Don Strom did not comment on the incident itself because of the ongoing nature of the investigation.

Savaglio issued a written statement to Student Life on the Saturday afternoon following the bust confirming that University officials had informed his chapter of "an investigation into possible misconduct by individual students living at the Sigma Alpha Mu house."

Savaglio did not specify the exact nature of the misconduct, but denounced any violations of University and fraternity policy that might have occurred.

"The Phi chapter of Sigma Alpha Mu supports actions by authorities to uphold the law and campus policy; any violations of campus policy and Fraternity policy by individual members is unacceptable and inconsistent with the values and traditions of Sigma Alpha Mu," Savaglio said in the statement. "If it is determined that any individuals violated chapter regulations they will be subject to disciplinary action from the Fraternity, including the possible loss of membership."

In the statement, Savaglio also announced that the fraternity had voluntarily suspended all social activities to aid the investigation and to allow the fraternity's members to prepare for exams.

There was no information about the incident in WUPD's media log within 48 hours of the incident, though the event was added to the log the following weekend.

"If there's any reason to believe that the investigation could be compromised by giving information, we will withhold that information," Strom said.

The University might have broken the law, according to Adam Goldstein, attorney advocate at the Student Press Law Center. Not publishing a report in the crime log within 48 hours of an event on campus violates a federal law known as the Clery Act, he said.

"If there was a drug bust that happened, they had 48 hours under federal law to include it in the crime log. If it's not in the log then they're out of compliance of the Clery Act," Goldstein said.

Originally called the Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act, the Clery Act was passed in 1990 and named for Jeanne Clery, a 19-year-old Lehigh University freshman who was sexually assaulted and murdered in her residence hall in 1986.

The law requires public and private post-secondary institutions receiving federal financial assistance to add campus crimes to their police logs within two business days of the initial report of the crime to the police department. Institutions that violate the Clery Act are subject to financial penalties from the U.S. Department of Education.

Departments may withhold information that would jeopardize a victim's identity or whose disclosure would violate the law.

SAM was founded in 1909 at the City University of New York. Its mission, according to the national fraternity's Web site, is "to guide each undergraduate member toward a more meaningful life, to prepare members for responsible fraternity and community involvement, and to create social and service opportunities for its alumni."

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
An earlier version of this article misquoted Washington University Police Chief Don Strom regarding the circumstances under which the police department withholds information from its media log; information is withhold only when it could compromise the investigation, not the University. Student Life regrets the error.

Comments

21 comments
sad alum
Tue Dec 30 2008 01:17
SAE and SAMMY have now been forced to surrender their houses to campus authorities. Anyone find it ironic that these two houses are probably the two most important pieces of real estate that the university has yet to gobble up in its grand plan of revamping that part of campus. Think about it, SAE is the closest house to the AC (which, I've heard, may undergo serious rennovation/partial demolition as early as 2011) and SAMMY is pretty much touching the law school/the new econ, poli sci building. God forbid all those high falutin, non-teaching researchers would have to deal with drunken undergrads! Oh the thought! Move in some generic group of social outcasts onto frat row!
brownbear88
Thu Dec 25 2008 01:44
"Your name" (Dec. 14),

"The school does not have to report the crime within 48 hours unless the crime poses a threat to the safety of students/employees. A drug violation is not something that threatens the saftey of students or employees. So, according to the Clery Act, this did not need to be reported until WU provides their Annual Security Report to the Department of Education which occurs once a year. Nice job StudLife with your sub-par reporting once again. Maybe you should just start distributing your newspaper in the bathroom stalls, and have building services stop stocking the toilet paper dispensers..."

The Clery Act definition given in this article is correct. Where are you getting your definition from, Your name? All campus crimes have to be placed in the police's logs within 48 hours of the crime occurring. Check the Student Press Law Center's website if you don't believe me, it gives the definition there.

StudLife wins this one, but like any newspaper out there, they do lose their fair share of times.

Your name
Mon Dec 22 2008 11:19
"Your name 12/17"- The incident you're referring to was in 2003. It was not for cocaine. A local kid with a lb of weed and a gun walked into the house, tried to sell it then rob an interested party. The fraternity brother who was robbed had a 4.0 GPA in computer sciences and engineering decided that rather than have everything in his room taken (including his laptop), he would fight back and he tackled an armed robber. Other fraternity brothers held down the robber and his extremely violent girlfriend until the authorities arrived. The university did not turn a blind eye, as Sammy was forced to agree to a list of 27 terms, one of which included having an RA in the fraternity house. Other terms included social probation (no events, no participation in others' events), heavy fines which essentially bankrupted the chapter, and denial to participate in charitable events such as Thurtene. At this time, Sammy was a dry house, so the RA would go through the trash cans each night to make sure there were no beer bottles. That would have made it the only non-voluntary substance-free housing at WashU. Did Sammy get into trouble once during their two-year probation? Nope. Did the RA ever find any beer bottles in his nightly search? Nope. Now, since this happened way back in 2003, all members of the Fraternity have since graduated. You can't hold people liable for the actions of their predecessors who never attended school at the same time.

As for the idea that either Sid Guller, Sam Fox or George Zimmer (of Men's Wearhouse fame) has ever lifted a finger to defend the current Sammy, you are dead wrong. They have zero affiliation with the chapter, they refuse to donate or attend events, and both George and Sam were kind enough to ask the chapter to take their names of their mailings list.

John Ryan, alum
Sun Dec 21 2008 12:56
"The school does not have to report the crime within 48 hours unless the crime poses a threat to the safety of students/employees. A drug violation is not something that threatens the saftey of students or employees. So, according to the Clery Act, this did not need to be reported until WU provides their Annual Security Report to the Department of Education which occurs once a year. Nice job StudLife with your sub-par reporting once again. Maybe you should just start distributing your newspaper in the bathroom stalls, and have building services stop stocking the toilet paper dispensers..."

Ummm, wrongo, "Your Name."

The Clery Act requires that schools that maintain a police or security department disclose in the public crime log "any crime that occurred on campus…or within the patrol jurisdiction of the campus police or the campus security department and is reported to the campus police or security department." The log must include the "nature, date, time, and general location of each crime" as well as its disposition if known. Incidents are to be included within TWO BUSINESS DAYS but certain limited information may be withheld to protect victim confidentiality, ensure the integrity of ongoing investigations, or to keep a suspect from fleeing. Only the most limited information necessary may be withheld and it must be released "once the adverse effect…is no longer likely to occur."

Looks like you're the one who's wrong, not StudLife. At least they put their name on the articles, more than can be said for you.

greekalum
Wed Dec 17 2008 21:31
Few Points worth pondering:

*Sam Fox was a Sammy...ever wonder why they're immune from the administration's wrath?
* This BS drug bust continues to affirm my seemingly conspiratorial (yet increasingly logical) belief that Wash.U. has a grand plan aimed at reducing the influence of the school's most socially influential fraternities. First they went after Sigma Chi in the spring of 2005, then they came down hard on SAE in the late fall of 2005, then they pulled some draconian fear tactic moves aimed at limiting Sig Ep' and Kappa Sig's fun quotient in the fall of 06 and spring of 07, respectively. They very strategically go after certain houses with what I have come to believe is the hope that those houses will cave to the pressure and then cave as fraternities.
*These policies are always publicly advocated by the likes of Carneghi and a number of low-level GLO officials, yet the real decisions are clearly made at the top. Whether or not the top is Wrighton, McLeod or the school's trustees I honestly have no idea. I do not profess to know of the internal workings of the administration (A VERY VERY secret one at that) but it seems that any close observer can start putting the pieces together and realizing that the university is working to systematically undermine the influence of Greek Life on campus. They are doing so, however, in a sly and disingenuous manner, however. By choosing to very publicly reprimand Greek organizations, they paint a highly misleading picture of Greek Life at Wash.U. In point of fact, the Greek system at WUSTL is utterly tame, egalitarian and self-regulated. Yet, by highlighting very public drug incidents, the school can win the public relations war while limiting the dissent of potentially irate alums.

Think I'm crazy? This is a policy which has been openly pursued at other institutions and it makes perfect sense that they'd bring it to WU as well.

Your name
Wed Dec 17 2008 16:46
This isn't surprising. They had an incident several years ago (2004 or 2005) involving a gun and a botched cocaine deal to which the university turned a blind eye. Maybe it's because they have prestigious alumni donors. Who knows? All I know is that while drugs can certainly be found in all campus fraternities, Sammy has been the most blatant violator for years. Kick them off campus and revoke their charter. It's only fair.
Ariel
Wed Dec 17 2008 13:56
Dear "Your Name" (12/13 14:54) I'm pretty sure the entire sophomore suite DOES get busted for one person's drug dealing (consumption I'm not so sure about). In fact, I'm pretty sure its happened in my time here. At any rate, anyone at a party can get punished for underage drinking and providing alcohol to a minor, whether or not that particular individual was drinking/buying/etc.
Your name
Tue Dec 16 2008 23:21
"There are unconfirmed reports but administrators did not confirm these reports". Wow unconfirmed reports which were not confirmed, what a novel concept! Was someone smoking something when they wrote/edited this?
Your name
Mon Dec 15 2008 17:54
Apparently the arrest involved 100+ pot brownies and cocaine residue on a scale.. but these are only rumors, take them as such. Any and all illegal activity within a frat house would certainly be known by other members of the house, so to say that one should not punish a house for complacency would be ridiculous.. they are and should be held accountable for the activities of brothers. The bottom line is that when a fraternity is using a university-granted property to deal drugs, then whether they should be able to use that property is put in question.

And don't take this Clery Act argument at face value. SAM and WU/WUPD are not necessarily on opposite sides of the coin here. Think of all the alumni pull that SAM has and what kind of clout they carry with university policy. Sam Fox (school of design) is a SAM alum... think about it. "compromise the university" is right, where pissing off alumni with deep pockets is the last thing the university wants to do.

jeff
Mon Dec 15 2008 07:45
Everyone knows Sammy deals a lot of weed. They have ounces of that stuff around the house most of the time. No other frat comes close, and yet their only punishment over the last few years has been Social probation, which they violate every weekend.
Your name
Sun Dec 14 2008 18:25
The school does not have to report the crime within 48 hours unless the crime poses a threat to the safety of students/employees. A drug violation is not something that threatens the saftey of students or employees. So, according to the Clery Act, this did not need to be reported until WU provides their Annual Security Report to the Department of Education which occurs once a year. Nice job StudLife with your sub-par reporting once again. Maybe you should just start distributing your newspaper in the bathroom stalls, and have building services stop stocking the toilet paper dispensers...
Your name
Sun Dec 14 2008 04:05
"dumb enough to get caught"

hasn't sammy had the highest gpa on campus the past 3 semesters? i think their chapter actually had the highest gpa of all sammy chapters in the country, at one of the hardest schools in the country. im pretty sure it was above a 3.6. im also pretty sure its spelled "sammy" not "sammie." im pretty sure whoever posted at 23:46 is an idiot and probably on drugs much more harmful than the ones im sure sammy got caught with.

Your name
Sat Dec 13 2008 23:46
Just more typical sammie . . . dumb enough to get caught.
Your name
Sat Dec 13 2008 18:01
In regards to the sarcastic poster who attacks Kat, I don't think the issue is whether or not students do drugs on campus. We all know they do. The fact remains though that some fraternities do a lot more than others and to argue that they should not be punished accordingly is stupid.
Your name
Sat Dec 13 2008 17:16
washu withholding information-- how could that be!? they always tell us everything!

typical behavior on behalf of the administration. dunno about the actual bust, but i would find it hilariously ironic if washu did break a federal law. it would just be the summation of all their ridiculous, secretive behavior.

Some guy
Sat Dec 13 2008 15:44
Kat,

I'd sit back and wait. The author says that fraternity members haven't talked yet. Until more details of the event come out I think that there's little point in trying to compare this event to the past events.

Your name
Sat Dec 13 2008 15:39
Kat- It would be nice if you posted from an objective point of view instead of blindly asserting falsehoods. Not only are you ill informed about the amount of "drug related incidents" at SAM but you also are clearly unaware of the manner in which SAM has been punished and the manner in which other fraternities are. Get your facts straight.
Your name
Sat Dec 13 2008 14:54
Kat -

Do you mean to suggest that there are drugs on college campuses? Oh Lord. Woe is the state of academia. Everybody panic. Do you think drugs are dealt from dormitories too or is it just fraternities? Have you ever had fun in your life or do you just derive pleasure from taking a moral high road? What are you going to do if your future (or present) child sips alcohol before he/she turns 21? I do hope you'll call the cops on them immediately.

Assuming it was just one student who was "busted," why punish the entire fraternity for his mistake? Would you punish an entire sophomore suite for the actions of one individual?

Nobody even knows what kind of a drug bust this was. Maybe the kid was trafficking in unprescribed Percosets or Zoloft. I assume from your reaction that you know it to have been black tar heroin.

Give me an example of a way in which any of the other fraternities has been treated differently.

Kat
Sat Dec 13 2008 12:40
I'm surprised the author of the article chose to focus on the Clery Act element -- you'd think it'd be more interesting to talk about how many drug related incidents have happened at SAM and why they never seem to be punished in the way other fraternities are
Your name
Sat Dec 13 2008 01:19
What a surprise. Wash U thinking it is above the law. What else is new?