States investigate easing campus gun control regulations
Legislators in several states are considering legislation that would allow students to carry licensed firearms on campus.
Officials in Texas, Arizona, Tennessee, Michigan, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Florida, Nebraska and Mississippi have proposed the loosening of gun control on college campuses.
This wave of legislation comes in the wake of recent events, including the Tucson shooting in January of this year and the campus shootings at Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois University in 2007 and 2008, respectively.
“Campus carry” advocates argue that allowing students with licenses to carry concealed weapons on campus would enable them to defend themselves and others in the case of an attack.
According to Andy Pelosi, director of the Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus, an extension of GunFreeKids.org, this argument is not strong enough to justify allowing concealed weapons on campus.
“We don’t think arming students is going to deter the rare campus shootings. We’re not convinced that that deterrent factor is going to come into play,” he said.
John Moynihan, a junior interested in student safety issues, thinks that the proposed legislation could have a basis in long-term foundations.
“It might also be a reaction to anti-gun sentiment that’s been building for about the last four years, about a Democratic president and Congress [potentially] restricting handgun rights and permits. Right before the election, there were a lot of people talking about getting a gun permit before they were restricted further,” Moynihan said.
The right to bear arms is enumerated in the Second Amendment to the Constitution, though its interpretation is much debated. State governments are currently able to restrict these rights in public institutions like universities.
While anti-gun advocates argue that these restrictions are important in a college setting, gun rights advocates by contrast say that college environments are not different enough from the rest of society to merit such policy exceptions.
Increased incidence of high-risk behaviors on college campuses, such as binge drinking and drug use, are commonly cited by anti-gun advocates as reasons to keep weapons off campus. Other factors that might increase risk of gun accidents among college students include high stress, elevated suicide risk and more opportunities for gun theft in a dormitory setting.
According to Washington University Chief of Police Don Strom, college campuses are safer than most other settings.
“Except for some very tragic episodes…the actual incidence of violence on college campuses is very low. College students experience less violence on an annual basis than non-students do. So, as a whole, college campuses are safe environments for students,” Strom said.
Strom thinks that allowing concealed weapons on college campuses is an added risk to students, a sentiment reflected by the International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators.
“There are studies that show that bringing guns into a campus environment can actually increase the danger for people on the campus,” Strom said. “I don’t think it complements the culture of a college campus, and I think that frankly, a lot of people on our campus would be particularly furious being in an environment daily where they were wondering if the person next to them was carrying a firearm or not.”
According to Pelosi, students at many of the public universities in the states where this legislation has been proposed are opposed to the changes, which has been shown by student petitions and other demonstrations of activism.
“The legislators also need to be listening to the folks that are running the schools, as well as the students who attend it,” he said.
Pelosi suggests alternate means of making campuses safer, including mental health screenings and higher security measures.
Washington University does not allow concealed handguns to be carried on campus or stored in cars parked on campus. Because of this, students with gun permits who live off campus are unable to carry concealed weapons with them for protection as they walk home.
The University also restricts non-lethal items, allowing pepper spray but not stun guns or tasers. The state of Missouri does not require permits to carry these items.
“The University is constantly looking at those policies and reviewing them, and so I think we’re in a good place,” Strom said.
Moynihan suggested that gun policy reformers should focus on the licensing process, rather than regulations for carrying weapons.
“Presumably, the permit application process weeds out people who are risks anyway. So, if we’re talking about reform, maybe the answer is to loosen these restrictions for people who have permits but tighten the regulation process for obtaining the permit,” Moynihan said. “That would help keep handguns out of the hands of people who might be dangerous but allow everyone else to exercise their constitutional rights.”
Other issues that come into play for universities considering loosening gun restrictions include higher insurance premiums. A stricter process for obtaining permits might also help to mitigate this issue.
Still, many worry that there are too many risks associated with allowing concealed weapons on campus, including accidents and even the potential stifling of academic debate.

dont punish the right doers for what the snotnosed punks do.
“The whole Virginia Tech thing could also have been avoided if the shooter hadn’t been able to get a gun in the first place.”
Fortunately, this has already been addressed. In a law supported by the NRA, reporting of mentally ill people like the VT shooter has been mandated. Now we just need to enforce the current law, not write another that will similarly be ignored.
“And where are the good 2nd amendment defenders responding to the recent shooting of marshals in St. Louis? “If only those federal marshals had been allowed to carry guns to defend themselves”…Oh wait.”
Um. The news story on that particular story said, “Court documents show that Mr. Boles, whose criminal record stretched back to 1993, pleaded guilty to five felonies.” So the shooters in this case were already legally not allowed to own a gun. I’m afraid I can’t follow your logic that we should pass yet another law making it illegal to have a gun illegally.
“Now what if the criminal hadn’t been able to get his hands on a gun at all? What about that?”
That would be great. While you are at it, say “Hi” to Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny for me. I assume they live in your fantasy world too.
if a teacher or student had a gun at vt a hell of a lot of people would be huggin there ma ma and not layin in a pine box
“coop” makes some good points, in almost all states requiring/issuing concealed carry permits the law make 21 the entry age for getting the pistol permit, so there will be very few 18 to 20 year olds carrying a gun legally and frankly the usual teen age street punk, who does not attend a college, but will be armed for whatever crime of opportunity he may find on the campus, will not worry about censure from college authorities.
“The right to bear arms is enumerated in the Second Amendment to the Constitution, though its interpretation is much debated.”
This is not true. The Supreme Court has pretty much settled the debate over the interpretation of the 2nd Amendment in the Heller decision in 2009, and applied the Heller decision to the states in the McDonald decision in 2010. The 2nd Amendment secures an individual right of gun ownership inside and outside the home for lawful purposes such as self defense.
The on-going legal debates and court cases are over allowable regulations and the extent of the right. The interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is done: i.e the “militia only” interpretation is dead.
1. It’s pretty telling that the author of the article didn’t even mention Utah or Colorado, the two states that have campus carry. Neither of them have had any issues with concealed carry license holders.
2. The *legal* penalties for carrying on Wash U property are so laughably tiny (a $100 fine if and only if you get caught carrying *and* refuse to leave campus) that the only people this would affect are the people who go to school here or work here. I’d expect the penalty would be either instant firing or instant expulsion.
3. Mr. Strom says that “Except for some very tragic episodes…the actual incidence of violence on college campuses is very low. College students experience less violence on an annual basis than non-students do.” While technically correct, this is because the majority of violent crime is committed in the poorest parts of the inner cities. Hardly surprising that by removing that from the equation, students are statistically “safer”. But compare someone on Wash U’s campus to a peer working in Clayton? I doubt we’ll see any meaningful difference.
4. Mr. Strom also states that: “There are studies that show that bringing guns into a campus environment can actually increase the danger for people on the campus.” I’d love to see them; as I said before, Utah has not had any increased danger to students because of concealed carry.
5. Mr. Strom’s final point is that: “I don’t think it complements the culture of a college campus, and I think that frankly, a lot of people on our campus would be particularly furious being in an environment daily where they were wondering if the person next to them was carrying a firearm or not.” I don’t understand what he means by “culture of a college campus”, unless he means “vulnerability and reliance on authority figures to be there for them, even when they can’t be”. The real world doesn’t allow WUPD to be there for us whenever we need them at a moment’s notice. Mr. Strom, of course, carries a gun for himself, so he’s unlikely to be able to sympathize much with those of us who have to walk to or from our off-campus apartments after midnight. His second statement is also flawed. We are *already* in an environment where we have no idea whether the person next to us has a gun or not. The only people these sorts of laws disarm are people who conscientiously obey the rule. Madmen and career criminals will break these laws along with the laws against murder, robbery, or rape. To think that having a law or rule on the books against carrying a gun onto campus will actually dissuade an evil person from doing so is wishful thinking at its most pernicious.
Here’s the problem in Texas:
Lately, motor Vehicle burglaries have steadily increased on all campuses.
Current policy requires that Licensees can carry their gun all over Campus, but must store it in their car while in a class or Library or building.
Under current Texas law, it is a felony to go on the “premises “of schools or educational institutions with a weapon.
BUT, note the definition below
Sec. 46.035 TEXAS Penal Code
f) In this section:
(3) “Premises” means a building or a portion of a building. The term does not include any public or private driveway, street, sidewalk or walkway, parking lot, parking garage, or other parking area.
Guns are allowed on Campuses already and always have been. It’s only inside the buildings that they are prohibited.
Campus Police officer point of view:
Licensees can be armed in city libraries, but on campus we prefer to create a situation of giving easy access to guns to criminals? That doesn’t make sense.
If you were a campus police officer on a call to a burglary of a vehicle in progress, would you prefer to walk up to a burglar holding a bunch of CDs and an I-Pad, or holding a gun a Licensee had to store in his car while he runs into the library?
Let the Licensee who carries daily in a secured concealed holster keep his or her weapon secured and concealed, not in a car for a criminal to take.
Passing the campus carry bills will aid in keeping guns out of the wrong (criminals’) hands.
Now, licensees can carry their concealed gun all over campus except into the library or classrooms, so they have to store them in cars which get burglarized when they are going into a building.
As I said, I can’t even recall the last time anyone reached into my pants in a classroom.
However I have had my car broken into and contents stolen.
Vehicle burglaries are on the rise at all campuses, this is where you currently have to store your gun, allowing easier access to criminals. Criminals who will use your gun to commit other crimes. 70% of gun crimes are committed with stolen guns. (We figure the rest are in Mexico.)
This bill needs to pass, it’s just common sense.
We want to stop providing easy access to guns through vehicular burglaries to criminals, and the Brady Campaign and their followers are inhibiting that goal of stopping easy access to guns for criminals by spreading false fears to campus leaders and students.
Alternatively, we can keep the “status quo” of providing free guns to criminals on campus property, to be used in other crimes.
Thanks for your astute observations and good exposition of a rationale for campus carry.
I believe in the second amendment and have a CWP in my home state, so I’m in general agreement. However, my personal practice has always been to have my weapon on my person, under my sole control OR have it so secured that it is a threat to no one.
I just wonder how a student living in a dorm room shared with another student, and potentially visited by yet other students, would secure their weapon while in the shower or otherwise not in a position to keep it under their personal control. It would seem some kind of lock box needs to be part of the equation to make this viable for students living on campus. Commuting students: no problem.
Regards and: keep safe.
The idea that drugs, alcohol, serious relationship drama, fraternity parties, suicides, etc don’t mix with guns is misguided. 99% of the undergrads that live on campus at WashU aren’t even eligible to have their conceal & carry license so that part is a non-issue. You have to be at least 23 years old to even qualify for the license.
That leaves the largest population of people that could potentially carry if this new law were enacted to professional staff people and professors. I think this is a good idea. People that have already gone through the trouble of obtaining this license are overwhelmingly good and solid people. They have spent a lot of time and money to become properly trained with their firearm. The whole Virgina Tech thing could have been avoided or significantly minimized if one of the professors was allowed to carry.
I’m open minded. Do you agree? What is the other side of the argument?
The whole Virginia Tech thing could also have been avoided if the shooter hadn’t been able to get a gun in the first place.
And where are the good 2nd amendment defenders responding to the recent shooting of marshals in St. Louis? “If only those federal marshals had been allowed to carry guns to defend themselves”…Oh wait.
Now what if the criminal hadn’t been able to get his hands on a gun at all? What about that?
“The whole Virginia Tech thing could also have been avoided if the shooter hadn’t been able to get a gun in the first place.”
True, but there are two minor problems:
1. We’re not talking about gun control for the whole nation here. We’re discussing the issue of whether campuses being “gun-free” (what I like to call “criminal carry only”) zones makes sense. It doesn’t. It’s unenforceable – basically an honor code.
2. I’m sure that a nationwide gun ban will work just as well as the nationwide marijuana, cocaine, and heroin bans. If you really want any of those substances, you can get them. Hell, you can probably buy them on campus. The only difference is that guns are highly durable goods, so they will remain in circulation longer.
And no one but children and imbeciles actually thinks having a gun makes you invincible. That’s a pretty transparent straw man.
I completely agree with you concealed carry should be aloud on campus because our society lives with false security on campus In order to slow down not get rid of crime you need more legal guns on the streets