Controversy N’ Coffee

Students and faculty discuss the importance of having a socioeconomically diverse campus

| News Staff
Associate Director of Cornerstone Harvey Fields speaks at Thursday’s discussion about socioeconomic diversity. (Matt Mitgang | Student Life)

Associate Director of Cornerstone Harvey Fields speaks at Thursday’s discussion about socioeconomic diversity. (Matt Mitgang | Student Life)

Amid a relaxed atmosphere, Controversy N’ Coffee and WU/FUSED hosted a multicultural panel on the topic of socioeconomic diversity to a group of nearly forty students Thursday evening.

The panel was composed of John Berg, Vice Chancellor of Admissions; Pam Hansen, Associate Vice Chancellor for Alumni & Development Programs; Harvey Fields, Assistant Director of Academic Programs, Center for Advanced Learning and senior Cristina Woodhouse, president of the Association of Latin American Students (ALAS) and TRiO.

The panel introduced the subject with a discussion of the University’s Pell Grant awards, leading into a larger conversation on socioeconomic diversity.

The University ranks lowest among the top 25 universities as a recipient of Pell Grants. This statistic is problematic and discourages many potential students from applying, some students said.

“A lot of my peers did not apply to Wash. U. because of upfront costs,” Woodhouse said.

The administration also acknowledged that many students do not apply due to tuition rates.

“People feel as though this is an expensive institution,” Henson said. “Overcoming that perception can be very challenging.”

Berg noted that the University’s low rank is due in part to the specificity of Pell Grant stipulations.

“Federal guidelines are very strict on who is eligible for a Pell Grant…If you fall literally one penny from the amount, you are not eligible,” he said. “We help many families that fall just above the Pell Grant guidelines to afford Washington University.”

Associate Vice Chancellor for Admissions John Berg speaks at Thursday’s discussion. The panel was hosted by student group Controversy N’ Coffee.

Associate Vice Chancellor for Admissions John Berg speaks at Thursday’s discussion. The panel was hosted by student group Controversy N’ Coffee. (Matt Mitgang | Student Life)

Moreover, according to Berg, only 8 percent of students who are eligible for Pell Grants apply to top tier universities.

Panelists said socioeconomic diversity is a crucial topic for the University to address.

“We want to be at a university that is diverse in every sense of the word—that’s why we work [at WU],” Berg said.

While students said they feel that the University is multiculturally diverse, most said they believe the University is lacking not only socioeconomic diversity but also awareness on the issues related to it.

“I think that compared to multicultural diversity and other initiatives, I don’t think that [socioeconomic diversity] is given the attention that it deserves, and I think it’s one of those often overlooked factors,” said sophomore Kellie Moore, internal vice president of CNC.

Students also expressed concern that opportunities for financial support are not well publicized, and few said they are aware of available financial help.

“Even though there have been initiatives toward promoting [opportunities], there’s always room for improvement, and we should definitely make more of an effort to promote awareness to our students of the financial resources available to them,” said sophomore Mariana Oliver, president of CNC and panel moderator.

Students in attendance said they were less than satisfied with the panel discussion.

“It was an informative session, but I felt like there was so much pre-decided conversation,” sophomore Baltazar Benavides said. “There wasn’t enough peppering back and forth between students and panelists, so some topics students wanted to hear weren’t even addressed. It was helpful overall, but I would have liked it if we could have gone into greater depth on a few issues.”

Freshman Jaclyn French agreed that the discussion did not delve far enough into the issue.

“I think that it could have gone a little bit deeper,” French said. “I think that a lot of the panelists were agreeing with each other and didn’t get to the meat of the issue, but it was definitely a good start.”

French emphasized the value of having a discussion about socioeconomic diversity on campus.

“At this caliber of university where there are a good deal of rich students, I think [socioeconomic diversity is] something that can easily be overlooked, and I think that it’s something there can be a stigma about,” she said. “I know that Wash. U. has a little bit of a stereotype of being a country club, so while there is a range of students, I think it could be more visible.”

  • Bailey Henderson

    Poor news – Syria’s ‘mutilation mystery’ increases…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=593555791 Jerome Bauer

    Here is the article I had trouble finding, thanks to a prompt email from editor Sam Guzik. I stand by my assertion that the article about the “former lecturer” was invisible last year, and that some comments are censored. Of course they are. Also, the search engine, perhaps for technical reasons, does not always yield results as prompt at Sam Guzik’s courteous reply. Thank you!

    SWA a necessary presence on campus: http://www.studlife.com/archives/Forum/2006/10/11/SWAanecessarypresenceoncampus/

    I changed the title to Student Worker Alliance in my Associated Content blog. That may have been the reason I could not find the article promptly. I apologize for overreacting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=593555791 Jerome Bauer

    If we had more low income students and faculty, we might be able to rebuild our labor advocacy movement. We might get some action, not just patronizing talk and redwash bombast. If you want to talk that talk, please walk that walk. Let me see you in front of a picket line with a bullhorn.

    Cultural conservatives are often much more progressive on labor, civil rights, and human rights issues than the average WashU student, professor, or dean, who tend to be very liberal only on the lifestyle issues.

    Last year I caricatured this attitude as “debauch yourselves and screw the workers.” This was a little too strong for the Student Life discussion board last year. My comment was censored. Let’s see if it will be censored from this year’s “Controversy’n Coffee” discussion board. You want controversy, more peppering back and forth, don’t you?

    Please see my Student Life Op-Ed, “WashU needs more Asian-American and ethnic studies, October 17, 2007, which addresses these issue. It is included in my Facebook Note, Washington University Needs More Ethnic, Asian American, Oriental/Philological, and Civilizational Studies, http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=134122419828

    Lecturer Dr. Jerome Bauer
    per veritatem vis
    http://www.cfu-lc.com/victory.htm

    PS. I tried to find my op-ed, published in autumn 06, entitled “Student-Worker Alliance a necessary presence on campus,” but for some reason, it is not coming up when I search for it by name, or by my name. Why does this not surprise me? I know there was extensive Student Life coverage of the SWA, but it now seems hard to find. The article is republished on my Associated Content blog site, with the formal permission of the Student Life editorial board, Here it is, embedded in my Facebook Note, “letter of solidarity by student worker alliance, autumn 06, submitted as part of my formal application for washu teaching”: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=127130639828

    Here is a link to another article, offline all last year, now back online: “Former lecturer [sic] finds new paths after leaving [sic] WU.” I am not “Former Lecturer, thank you very much, Student Life, and I have never, nor will I ever, leave WashU. How could I leave? http://www.studlife.com/archives/News/2008/04/16/FormerlecturerfindsnewpathsafterleavingWU/

    Here is Student Life’s editorial endorsing my reemployment, When I read it, I immediately posted a response, now offline, thanking the editorial board for their endorsement. Nevertheless, I asked not to be treated as a special case, lest nothing of lasting value be accomplished. I have consistently linked my special case to that of all other Lecturers. “Put teaching before research” http://www.studlife.com/archives/Forum/2007/01/22/Putteachingbeforeresearch/

    Please support Lecturer’s Policy Reform: “the case for lecturer’s policy reform,” http://www.facebook.com/note.php?saved&&suggest&note_id=69063694828

    I had not intended to post all these links in this postscript, but the recurring problems with your search engine prompted me to change my mind.