Refocus the campus discussion to the victims
We may not all be able to understand the hurt that may have been inflicted on the black students physically present when a Sigma Alpha Epsilon pledge read a rap song lyric containing the N-word while they were sitting in Bear’s Den Tuesday night. But that does not mean that many of us do not or should not feel personally affected or pained by the pledges’ actions.
Bear’s Den is a place that we consider part of our home. It is a place where we like to consider ourselves safe, both physically and emotionally.
Much of the campus dialogue over what has happened—particularly on the Student Life website, where commenters may post anonymously—has been notably incendiary and unproductive. Monitoring the comments on our website, we have seen dozens of community members attempt to minimize emotions of hurt as overreactions.
Shaming students for feeling hurt by a racial slur devalues the actual pain that such a word can inflict. It distracts us from needed introspection about pain being inflicted in our community.
Too many students think that we as a community are immune to problems like discrimination or racism, but that is not true. Those who would have us sweep this conversation under the rug detract from others who are trying to help the victims of the situation and prevent future incidents of a similar nature.
The word spoken in Bear’s Den at 2 a.m. on Wednesday morning is a word that has, for centuries, been associated with hate and used for oppression. Lyric or not, scavenger hunt item or not, it is a word that should not be said in any circumstance. Using it in front of the group it targets is blatantly offensive.

Given this absolute stance on the use of this word, will StudLife be leading the charge against allowing Macklemore to perform “Thrift Shop” on campus? The word “honky” is just as offensive to many of us at Wash U.
Obviously that word does not pass the offensive test (at least for studlife) as it was approved by the moderator and posted. I would like to see a studlife taskforce cracking it down on the slightest slur as well as tackling men to the ground in quad for referring to females as “dude”. As humorous as that would be, I am with you, if you are going to do something, better do it all the way.
What about the victims of the character assassination piece you published? StudLife should take some responsibility for the journalistic malpractice that occurred under its name, and apologize to the students it implicitly accused of being overtly racist.
“Lyric or not, scavenger hunt item or not, it is a word that should not be said in any circumstance.”
So does the Studlife editorial staff support censoring books like Huck Finn?
NOOOOO!!! I LOVE HUCK FINN!
“Lyric or not, scavenger hunt item or not, it is a word that should not be said in any circumstance.”
If this is the opinion of Studlife, then why has this same paper endorsed the word being used in music and movies? Glowing reviews of past WILD performances and films such as “Django Unchained” are nothing but hypocritical if this paper truly feels that the word should not be used in any circumstance.
Thank you
then stop printing such drastically, sensationalist stories. get the facts
“it is a word that should not be said in any circumstance.”
If this is the actual opinion of Studlife, which I sincerely believe, then they should issue apologies for favorably covering WILD performers and entertainers who routinely use this same slur.
Thank you.
Thanks for this.
Princeton, you went so far as to say the students were treating the black student as objects in their photo before seeing the photo, yet today you seem to have ignored commenting on the factual, up-to-date story? Why is that?
You’re no more or less racist than the kid who dropped the N-word in his poetry reading, based on your assumptions and comments regarding white people in your comments, and you failure to redact assumptions you made that were seen as false.