Student Life | The independent newspaper of Washington University in St. Louis since 1878

The inevitable legalization of marijuana

A few days ago happened to be April 20. No matter how secluded anyone is, after coming to college they certainly know about so-called “National Pot Day.” Marijuana culture in college is pervasive; even those who don’t actively participate or never have participated are nonetheless informed about certain well-known aspects of it. Similarly, there has been an active push lately from certain organizations toward marijuana legalization; in the last few years, it has become medicinally legal in California, Colorado and many other states, and in 2010, California narrowly voted down a measure to fully legalize cannabis. Taking a historical perspective, particularly from alcohol prohibition, it could be argued that the criminalization of marijuana is not beneficial to society at all and that legalization is inevitable, although it may take a long time.

However certain the eventual legalization of cannabis may be, the culture surrounding it certainly does not help. Shops such as Sunshine Daydream on the Delmar Loop promote a very public image of users of such substances being individuals for whom their drug use is definitional. While such people do exist, the vast majority of the users do not treat it as such, rather regarding it as something done only recreationally. Nonetheless, the image of the former is what is often portrayed in the media, thus leading to the formation of groups such as an Anti-4/20 group at the University of Colorado Boulder in response to the massive 4/20 Smoke Out on the campus.

Truth be told, the most dedicated users of any controlled substance are similar. Everyone on campus has no doubt had an experience in which they’ve overheard another person or group talking about the drunken exploits from the previous weekend, and no doubt many of you have participated in such discussions. These are no different from the “in your face” images that are often portrayed by the mainstream media of marijuana users who will convince today’s “fragile youth” to try cannabis, which itself leads to unfounded and non-scientific allegations that marijuana is a gateway drug that will inevitably lead most users to use much worse substances such as cocaine or heroin. The best way to seek marijuana legalization, in addition to demonstrating how much money and time prohibition wastes, is to recast the image of the user from a “pot-smoking hippie” to a normal, hardworking individual who simply chooses to do what he or she wants during free time.

As the legalization movement gathers steam, it is important to remember that cannabis is less harmful than some legal substances, such as alcohol or tobacco. Most people have no problems with users, so long as those users do not obstruct the day-to-day affairs of others. Other substances, such as alcohol or tobacco, can be physically addictive and can lead to many more secondary deaths through drunk driving, secondhand smoke and other external effects. Nonetheless, in order to make legalization far more tolerable to the population in general, users need to recast their image into something seen as less obnoxious in this day and age. While this may seem like a sacrifice of identity, it doesn’t really have to be; users should just employ far more discretion about the image they want to portray in order to push for legalization. In that regard, the 4/20 Smoke Out on the University of Colorado Boulder campus is incredibly misguided. Rather than demonstrating to the world that they are mature about their choices, events such as this make smokers appear to be obnoxious, attention-craving druggies with little regard for how their hobby may affect others.

comments

Log In

  • Greg Nehls says:

    While I agree that there is a need for an image change from cannabis users, the same can also be said for our government.
    Lets look at the way our government acts. Instead of a government for the people by the people it is a good ol boy network of Hippocrates who don’t listen to the voice of the people and continue to respond in an outdated form of government.
    I find it very appalling that a candidate can admit to having smoked marijuana and yet be elected president all because they never got arrested for possession and be allowed to have a fruitful life, while those arrested, their lives are destroyed and any opportunity of having a rich fulfilled life is taken from them. While our marijuana smoking or had smoked marijuana politicians can go on to destroy peoples lives for the same thing that they have done.
    Maybe its time to lock up these crooked politicians and crooked law enforcement with the same people they have helped to lock up and see if their point of view doesn’t change after their lives have been destroyed like those they have prosecuted.
    Its time for a change of the way our politicians view things and quit being so hypocritical of those who chose marijuana over alcohol and tobacco. So lets get back to the business of making this country the great nation that it once was and quit this senseless persecution of its citizens.

    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2

  • malcolmkyle says:

    Prohibition is overwhelmingly responsible for an immense increase in organized crime, international terrorism, rampant official corruption, a broken economy, mass unemployment and a serious undermining of international security and development.

    Corporate greed and individual bigotry have accelerated us towards a situation where all the usual peaceful and democratic methods, which can usually be employed to reverse such acute damage, no longer function as our founders intended. Such a political impasse coupled with our great economic tribulation is precisely that which throughout history has often ignited extreme social upheaval and violent revolution.

    “To function as the founders intended, our republic requires that the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
    – Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to William Stephens Smith, November 13, 1787

    Fortunately we are left with one last peaceful avenue for change – Jury Nullification.

    Jury Nullification is a constitutional doctrine that allows juries to acquit defendants who are technically guilty but do not deserve punishment. – All non-violent ‘drug offenders’ who are not selling to children – be they users, dealers or importers – clearly belong in this category.

    If you sincerely believe that prohibition is a dangerous and counter-productive policy then you must stop helping to enforce it. When it comes to acquittals, you, the juror, have the very last word!

    * It only takes one juror to prevent a guilty verdict.
    * You are not lawfully required to disclose your voting intention before taking your seat on a jury.
    * You are also not required to give a reason to the other jurors for your position when voting – just simply state you find the accused not guilty.
    * Jurors must understand that it is their opinion, their vote. If the Judge and the other jurors disapprove, too bad. There is no punishment for having a dissenting opinion.

    We must create what we can no longer afford to wait for – PLEASE VOTE TO ACQUIT!

    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1

    • warshu says:

      Not everyone can be on jury duty 24/7, so I would add that if you can’t beat the system, join it.

      Big pharma, alcohol, tobacco and textiles are the main reason why mj is still illegal. Legal mj is a huge threat to those industries’ profits. That is, unless things change and those industries become more receptive to change. Fortunately, pretty much everyone at wash u stands a good chance of actually making it to the top of such companies and sparking positive change for society.

      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

      • Malcolm Kyle says:

        Prescription drugs kill over 200,000 Americans every year– even when taken as directed and not abused. The drug war is all about preventing people from using the non-toxic alternative, marijuana.

        Partnership for a Drug Free America

        Sources of Funding from 1988-91
        Extracted from Federal Tax Returns

        (figures are approximate)

        Pharmaceutical Firms

        J. Seward Johnson, Sr. Charitable Trusts — $1.1 million
        Du Pont — 125,000
        Proctor and Gamble Fund — 120,000
        Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation — 115,000
        Johnson & Johnson — 100,000
        Merck Foundation — 85,000
        Hoffman-LaRoche — 75,000

        Tobacco and Liquor Firms

        Phillip Morris — 125,000
        Anheuser-Busch — 100,000
        RJ Reynolds — 100,000
        American Brands — 100,000

        Prohibition is nothing less than a grotesque dystopian nightmare; if you support it you must be either ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, criminally insane, or totally corrupt.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

4 Comments Add your comment
Student Life | The independent newspaper of Washington University in St. Louis since 1878