Banning the plastic bag ban
Marketed as sustainable and environmentally friendly, banning plastic bags is the newest fad among environmentalists. While the ban of plastic bags has noble goals in mind, it will unfortunately do more harm than good. Stopping the sale of plastic bags on campus will increase the use of paper and reusable bags, resulting in increased pollution, fewer American jobs and more cases of foodborne illness.
Using plastic bags causes less pollution than the alternatives of paper bags or reusable cloth bags. According to Stewart Smith (a source the group supporting the Wash. U. ban has cited), “the making of a plastic bag compared to a paper bag uses up to 40 percent less energy; produces up to 80 percent less solid waste; produces 72 percent less atmospheric emissions; and creates 90 percent less waterborne waste.” Furthermore, the United States largely imports paper bags whereas plastic bag manufacturing employs 30,000 Americans (National Center for Policy Analysis). Thus, the use of paper bags results in more pollution—such as oil burned to transport bags here—than plastic bags and takes away American jobs.
Reusable bags also harm the environment more than plastic bags. A study by the United Kingdom’s Environmental Agency found that a cotton tote must be reused 172 times to result in less global warming potential than using plastic disposable bags; 94 times to result in less abiotic depletion; 354 times to result in less marine aquatic toxicity; 1,899 times to result in less terrestrial ecotoxicity; and the list goes on. Keep in mind that a typical reusable cotton bag has an average lifespan of 52 reuses. The same study concluded that paper bags and biodegradable bags have worse environmental impacts than disposable plastic bags.
A University of Texas study by Klick and Wright found the number of foodborne illness cases has increased in San Francisco after the implementation of a plastic bag ban. People rarely wash their reusable bags, and, as a result, bacteria colonize the bag. Predictably, the bacteria infect the food, putting human life in danger and raising healthcare sector costs. Sterile plastic bags thus help keep foodborne illnesses to a minimum and save money.
Finally, plastic bags are reusable. Many Wash. U. students put them to work as trash can liners, a more environmentally friendly option than buying heavier trash bags, which have a much more energy-intensive production. The bags can then be thrown away, shipped off to a landfill where they make up an insignificant amount of the waste at less than 1 percent of the total space (Reason magazine) and are inert. Or many plastic bags can be recycled themselves! While plastic bag litter is harmful, both to wildlife and as an eyesore, Wash. U. students either reuse their plastic bags or dispose of them. I myself have never seen plastic bags strewn around campus.
Wash. U. must not enact the ban on plastic bags. However, students should still be aware of their bag usage: If a purchase from the bookstore can fit in their backpack, they should forego the plastic bag. But using a paper bag or a reusable bag will cause far more harm than good.

Wow! It’s hard to believe any of this. Banning plastic bags is indeed a noble cause. Have you looked at the litter plastic bags cause? Especially in our beautiful oceans and marine life, these bags are killing animals that are mistaking them as food and they are breaking down in our environment, adding to the plastic pollution that will last for centuries. And I have been using reusable bags for years, never once getting sick. Statistics can be used to defend both sides of this argument, but believe your own eyes. Anything you see floating around the streets or oceans that is not organic (not made from nature) will harm plants, animals and humans, since it disrupts the food chain. I don’t believe the plastic bag is sustainable.
Interesting energy statistics. The foodborne illness bit needs a little more background here, though. It sounds like shenanigans with the limited info you provided (Foodborne illness increased after the ban? Come on! We’re Wash U students! Lots of things could cause that!).
Looks like I won’t be signing that petition! Another instance where something on the surface looks beneficial, but in actuality, is not what it seems.
Sign the petition to show your disapproval of a plastic bag ban that would harm students.
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/stop-the-proposed-plastic-bag-ban/
The fact that plastic bags are recyclable doesn’t apply on WashU’s campus because our recycling system does not allow plastic bags. They cause damage to the machines that are used in the recycling process.
Then WashU should install facilities that allow plastic bags to be recycled.
Really? Because I’m pretty sure the signs on all of our single stream recycling bins say you can recycle everything except styrofoam, food, and liquid? If that is the case, they should change their signs.