College Media Network

Dining services on the right path

STAFF EDITORIAL

Print this article

Published: Friday, November 14, 2008

Updated: Friday, November 14, 2008

Although Wash. U. Dining Services has provided students with high-quality food, many have been frustrated by some of its practices. Many students feel that Dining Services’ prices are unreasonably exorbitant. Others have been upset to find that many of the foods they enjoy have been dropped from the menu in the Danforth University Center (DUC) throughout the year, without any prior warning or communication. Students have every right to raise these legitimate concerns, and Dining Services should be criticized when it fails to live up to their expectations.

Still, Dining Services has made real efforts recently to improve their operations, and these should not go unnoticed. Student purchases will now be tracked in order to observe and match food offerings more closely with student preferences. In addition, Student Union (SU) representatives will be consulted in order to address students’ concerns. We think that these measures are a good start for improving Dining Services, and support Dining Services’ efforts to implement them.

Dining Services has begun, for the first time, to track student purchases at eateries around campus and to analyze that data to better understand what students actually look for. Market research of this kind is standard business practice around the country and is long overdue at the University. This plan is a solid step toward overhauling the menus at campus eateries and ensuring that the food offered reflects the real desires of the student body—not just those voiced in surveys. In the long run, Dining Services’ new system will ensure that the foods most consumed by students are not mistakenly eliminated from the range of campus food options.

Dining Services has also utilized SU representatives’ advice in deciding what foods to offer in the new Wohl Center cafeteria. This will increase the likelihood that students on the South 40 will have more appealing food options than they might otherwise, and is an encouraging signal that Dining Services may value student input more highly in the future.
Other interesting ideas have been proposed as well. In order to deal with the long lines students often face in the DUC, Dining Services is considering the addition of a system wherein students could place food orders in advance from a computer, and then pick up the food once they arrive.

Dining Services’ operations have not been without their problems. We would like to see more effort from them to communicate what they plan to do and why prices often seem unreasonably high. More effort could be made to publicly inform students in advance when a menu item will be dropped, so that students have a chance to respond, and Dining Services should do a better job of explaining why their prices remain so high. Still, these proposals are a step in the right direction, and credit should be given where it is due.

Comments

4 comments
Your name
Sun Nov 16 2008 19:25
Yes, and the new manager actually eats at the food stations. Sure, he probably gets a little better service, but it still says a lot about his priorities.

Once we sign a contract for 5 more years, let's see how quickly they find excuses about how" general economic conditions cause the company to reevaluate the necessity for assessing different prices for certain food items" and then hike prices 20% over the summer. Pressure SU and the administration to reject the contract, and guarantee that the new provider will be so scared upon arrival that the service will be better.

r
Sat Nov 15 2008 16:11
it also helps that somebody new is in charge of bon appetit
JS
Fri Nov 14 2008 12:26
As, a long time consumer of the dining program; I am very pleased to see improvements in the overall services and quality of the dining program this year; I have noticed, farmers market, new ethnic meals, support on local grown foods, etc. I am confident that when university signs any contracts or legal document on this campus with anyone that there are clauses that will allow the university to terminate any contract if the expectations are not met. After all we have one of the best law school...don't we.
B
Fri Nov 14 2008 11:34
As journalists, it's really shocking that you miss the obvious impetus behind all of the changes in Dining Services this year. Wash U is in the final year of its contract with Bon Appetit or whatever the corporation that runs Dining Services is called. This is the "put up or shut up" year for Bon Appetit if they want to keep Wash U's business. The quality that we see this year could certainly be a loss leader to get Wash U locked in for multiple years in the future. After the administration signs another contract with Bon Appetit, I wonder if we'll start to see a considerable drop in quality back to what we used to see.




Verify you are human: