Turn fraternity housing over to minorities and women

Matthew Wallace | Staff Writer

Before you think about emailing me or Student Life telling us how this article is reactionary to the guns found on campus or why your fraternity isn’t like those rowdy hooligans from “the football frat,” just know I started writing this article a week before the permanent suspension of Phi Delta Theta.

Washington University has a pathetic history when it comes to appropriately disciplining fraternities for hazing, sexual assault and harassment, racist practices and violating any pre-existing watered-down punishment. Fraternities are a perfect representation of the type of person who has power and influence over the University: white, wealthy and male. You may find the occasional Black or Latinx member roaming their sticky halls, but every group that oppresses others needs that one example showing how progressive they are, or as Zora Neale Hurston famously said, “all my skinfolk ain’t kinfolk.” These “brotherhoods” have done nothing but occupy valuable space and make the University feel unsafe for many. In order to remediate the damage they have caused, Washington University should convert fraternity housing into living spaces for minorities and women.

The University recently released a two-year, 12-point plan for creating a more inclusive and diverse community. With this report and the constant talk about diversity, we can say that not only does University leadership know there is a problem, but they’re willing to devote time, energy and resources to fixing it. Well, I say it is time for them to put up or shut up. Anyone can generate long reports and come up with long-term plans, but what are you doing right now? There are obstacles that will take years to properly fix, but there are also ones that are more immediate and will demonstrate to minority students that you are serious about change. Go for the low hanging fruit—the lowest of which is providing spaces for minorities and women on campus. If the safety and success of minorities and women is a real priority for the University, then they can move heaven and earth to make sure something is done right now.

In his tenure as chancellor, Mark Wrighton has brought Wash. U. onto the cusp of national prominence. Although not as recognizable as peer institutions, if someone knows about Wash. U., they know where we stand—but they also know where we fall: designating space for its minority students. Northwestern University, the University of Chicago, Stanford University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Tufts University, Georgetown University, Cornell University, Brown University, the University of Pennsylvania and Yale University all have spaces for students of color, while Duke University has two. If we truly want our university to be a national powerhouse, then our leaders need to look past the endowment and start investing in what remains the weakest part.

Now, to the fraternities: Student Life recently detailed a partial timeline of negative fraternity-related incidents since 1993. This list is far from complete, and does not include the sexual assaults that the University is ill-equipped to properly handle or the racist practices that are touted as “tradition” or are justified because “we have a Black brother.” You may say it’s “only a few bad apples” but take a look at what that really means. The full quote is “a few bad apples spoils the barrel.” So, when one (or several) of you do something horrible, the moment you excuse or ignore it in the name of “brotherhood,” you are all forever tainted. When you join an organization, its reputation is now your reputation. Saying “I’ll speak up next time” keeps your nose away from smelling the rotting barrel that is your fraternity.

As most fraternities do little actual good to the University community, are regularly held unaccountable for their actions and make the University unsafe for minorities and women, I see no reason why we should continue to provide prime space for any fraternity. Wash. U. is laughably behind peer institutions in providing space for minorities and will continue to be as long as the University doesn’t make the success of its most vulnerable students a priority. You never see stories about a college finally attaining a record number of wealthy, white male groups on campus or about how they had to fight tooth and nail for the tiniest bit of space to call their own.

By taking the bold and necessary step in standing up to the white, male supremacy that is fraternities and giving space to minorities and women, Wash. U. will have truly taken the steps to becoming a real leader in the world. The past was only white and male, the future is diverse. Wash. U.: don’t be on the wrong side of history again.

  • Joe Pagliarulo

    Congratulations! You just successfully lobbied for the reinstatement of democrat-enforced segregation on this campus. You should be so proud you have pushed for the races to separate and hate each other. Just like a little Obama bot. You either don’t get what you’re pushing.. or you’re a good ol’ racist. You decide.

  • Phill Crapidy

    This is most definitely on the wrong side of history. Study up chaps… http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-12/novak-dangers-of-collectivism/5315134

  • kizmet paradigm


  • “We are going to segregate people by race to ensure diversity!”

    As a WUSTL alum and former fraternity member, I’ll be withholding any future donations to the University.


  • Shebility

    So you are want something that does not belong to you because you believe you’ve been wronged by the rightful owners and are thereby entitled to it—yes? You apparently want to circumvent the university’s processes and policies for reporting violations to your civil rights, so shall we assume your civil rights have not been violated but that you just don’t like other people’s speech and behavior?

  • murrangutang

    The university has POOR diversity, not the organizations within the university. The last 4 years the school has had between 6-9% black students, which means assuming that there is a 50:50 male-female ratio in that percentage, that each fraternity would have between 1-3 black brothers. Fraternities and sororities have lots of rich, white kids because the university has mostly rich, white kids. I wouldn’t blame the lack of diversity on fraternities.

    That being said, there’s a lot more that fraternities SHOULD be held accountable for. Sexual assault and rape is on top of that list. But your idea is to replace them, rather than provide an actual means of accountability. How about each fraternity member is required to be Green-Dot certified and attend Take Back the Night?

    This is a cultural and educational problem, and there is no such thing as an “easy” solution like simply banning fraternities. Parties on/ off-campus will still happen with or without fraternities and with that, there will always be the potential for sexual assault and rape.

  • Haqim

    AEPi can lead by example and turn its housing over to our Palestinian students

  • Mari Upthegrove

    Can’t get much more delusional, racist, and sexist than the fool who wrote this article.

  • Orlando Luis Pardo Lazo

    Is it wrong to be a white wealthy male member of a fraternity?

    Is it being white, wealthy and male a supremacism in itself?

    The hundreds of white and wealthy American citizens that I’ve met since I came from totalitarian Castro’s Cuba are violently misrepresented by Matthew Wallace, starting by WashU prestigious professors.

    So sad!