Comments on: “Yes” on Proposition N is a vote for a clean, healthy community http://www.studlife.com/forum/2009/10/23/%e2%80%9cyes%e2%80%9d-on-proposition-n-is-a-vote-for-a-clean-healthy-community/ The independent newspaper of Washington University in St. Louis Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:22:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dman http://www.studlife.com/forum/2009/10/23/%e2%80%9cyes%e2%80%9d-on-proposition-n-is-a-vote-for-a-clean-healthy-community/#comment-2227 Dman Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:30:51 +0000 http://www.studlife.com/?p=6072#comment-2227 By the way, why is there such a long rant on an outdoor ban? Prop N is about an indoor ban. By the way, why is there such a long rant on an outdoor ban? Prop N is about an indoor ban.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Dman http://www.studlife.com/forum/2009/10/23/%e2%80%9cyes%e2%80%9d-on-proposition-n-is-a-vote-for-a-clean-healthy-community/#comment-2224 Dman Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:21:12 +0000 http://www.studlife.com/?p=6072#comment-2224 The health benefits of the ban are crystal clear. The arguments against the ban are based on irrational political beliefs and emotion, not on science. Support the ban and you will support the health of our community. The health benefits of the ban are crystal clear. The arguments against the ban are based on irrational political beliefs and emotion, not on science. Support the ban and you will support the health of our community.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Rabi Bhattacharya http://www.studlife.com/forum/2009/10/23/%e2%80%9cyes%e2%80%9d-on-proposition-n-is-a-vote-for-a-clean-healthy-community/#comment-2145 Rabi Bhattacharya Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:38:54 +0000 http://www.studlife.com/?p=6072#comment-2145 Great article! The UC San Francisco study showing a statewide 17% drop in heart attacks within a year and a 36% drop in three years, following a ban on indoor smoking, is incontrovertible statistical evidence of the effectiveness of the ban. Great article! The UC San Francisco study showing a statewide
17% drop in heart attacks within a year and a 36% drop in three years, following a ban on indoor smoking, is incontrovertible statistical evidence of the effectiveness of the ban.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Thomas Laprade http://www.studlife.com/forum/2009/10/23/%e2%80%9cyes%e2%80%9d-on-proposition-n-is-a-vote-for-a-clean-healthy-community/#comment-2041 Thomas Laprade Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:49:50 +0000 http://www.studlife.com/?p=6072#comment-2041 Smoking bans and the heart Attack Fraud http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7451/ Smoking bans and the heart Attack Fraud

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7451/

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: repealthebans http://www.studlife.com/forum/2009/10/23/%e2%80%9cyes%e2%80%9d-on-proposition-n-is-a-vote-for-a-clean-healthy-community/#comment-2033 repealthebans Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:08:17 +0000 http://www.studlife.com/?p=6072#comment-2033 Outdoor bans are even crazier than indoor bans. The chemical make-up of shs is nearly 94% water vapor and A SLIGHT AMOUNT OF CARBON DIOXIDE with about 3% being carbon monoxide AND 3% CONTAINING THOSE SUPPOSED KILLER CARCENOGENS......... n-nitrosomines which you hear so much about is actually arsenic..what they dont tell you is that the measurements they took match the naturally occuring arsenic in the air outside everywhere. they measured levels at 0-29 picograms....which is totally safe...the amount has to be 5 million times that to be harmful to humans........you see how they switched it. Trying to blame shs for what is actually a natural thing. The levels of other things in shs if they can be measured at all are millions if not billions of times smaller than the amounts needed to harm anyone......just remember this second hand smoke is a joke within nano seconds from the burn it turns into WATER VAPOR.....Even the exhaled smoke is loaded down with water vapor...osha has said nothing in shs/ets is going to harm you or anyone else.....what shs will do is irritate those with weak immune responces.......thats why shs is classified as a class 3 IRRITANT BY OSHA AND THE EPA.....Remember this a prohibition movement must rely on scare tactics and big money in order to succeed to the level of getting legislation....These outdoor regulations are even crazier than the first claims made for indoor bans....... Outdoor bans are even crazier than indoor bans. The chemical make-up of shs is nearly 94% water vapor and A SLIGHT AMOUNT OF CARBON DIOXIDE with about 3% being carbon monoxide AND 3% CONTAINING THOSE SUPPOSED KILLER CARCENOGENS………

n-nitrosomines which you hear so much about is actually arsenic..what they dont tell you is that the measurements they took match the naturally occuring arsenic in the air outside everywhere.
they measured levels at 0-29 picograms….which is totally safe…the amount has to be 5 million times that to be harmful to humans……..you see how they switched it. Trying to blame shs for what is actually a natural thing. The levels of other things in shs if they can be measured at all are millions if not billions of times smaller than the amounts needed to harm anyone……just remember this second hand smoke is a joke within nano seconds from the burn it turns into WATER VAPOR…..Even the exhaled smoke is loaded down with water vapor…osha has said nothing in shs/ets is going to harm you or anyone else…..what shs will do is irritate those with weak immune responces…….thats why shs is classified as a class 3 IRRITANT BY OSHA AND THE EPA…..Remember this a prohibition movement must rely on scare tactics and big money in order to succeed to the level of getting legislation….These outdoor regulations are even crazier than the first claims made for indoor bans…….

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]>