Student Life | The independent newspaper of Washington University in St. Louis since 1878

Why substance free housing is a bad idea

When I was accepted to Washington University, one of my first decisions concerned housing. I was asked to state my preferences regarding when I go to bed, what temperature I prefer and how messy a room I can tolerate. Then there was the box that indicated “I prefer to live on a substance-free floor.” Although I knew little about what this box really meant, my gut reaction was to leave the box unchecked. Still, I did consider checking the box, if only to ensure that my floor would be little quieter at night when I wanted to study. On the other hand, while I have never been anything close to a heavy drinker or substance user, I knew that, like most college students, I might occasionally indulge in an adult beverage or two—yes, even before my 21st birthday. In the end, the decision was an easy one, and I hardly gave the issue a second thought until I arrived on campus.

When I arrived at Wash. U., I quickly learned what sub-free meant. It meant that the drinking that is tolerated on other freshman floors is not allowed on those floors. Yes, the residents of sub-free floors can drink, but not on the floor, and they are not allowed on the floor while drunk. These restrictions are actually considerably more relaxed than what I had envisioned when I heard the term “substance free.” I was surprised to learn that substance free residents are allowed to drink, and even more surprised to learn that many do drink.
Even despite these surprises, my freshmen experience has led me to take serious issue with the idea of substance-free housing. It is simply unnecessary, unfair and divisive to designate entire floors as substance free.

Substance-free housing is unnecessary because the decision to be substance free is inherently a personal one. If an individual wants to remain substance free, that is entirely his or her own choice. If someone is firm in his or her decision not to partake in drinking, he or she could do so no matter where he or she lives. If he or she prefers not even to have alcohol in the room, there could be an option to choose a substance free roommate, without designating entire floors as substance free.

The substance free designation is unfair because often the decision to live on a substance-free floor is not left in the hands of a student. I have met many students whose parents forced them to live on a sub-free floor, or worse, I have met students who did not ask to live on a sub-free floor but were put on one anyway simply because Residential Life needed to fill rooms. College is a place where at long last, young people achieve full independence. Creating a living option that may be preferable to many parents but not to their children is a disservice to students and an intrusion on the independence that college promises.

Finally, the existence of substance-free housing is divisive. In almost every other way there is diversity in housing. Freshman floors are intentionally diverse, with people of all backgrounds sharing one living space. I would say that one of the great pleasures of my first semester at Wash. U. has been living with people from all over the world, many of whom have entirely different beliefs from my own. This includes friends who live on my own floor who themselves choose to be substance free. Unfortunately, due to the existence of substance-free floors, there are many more potential friends who could have ended up on my floor, but did not because of the flick of a pen. Sadly, this is an unavoidable consequence when people are divided so artificially.

The college experience is designed to prepare students for the rest of their lives. Students take classes that prepare them for their careers, join clubs that allow them to share their interests and live with people that both become friends and expand their horizons. The fact is that throughout almost every Wash. U. graduate’s life, they will have to work with and probably live with or near people who do not agree with their personal decisions about alcohol and other substances. An important chance to prepare for this aspect of life comes in college. The opportunity to live with, understand and respect the different choices of one’s classmates is invaluable. Washington University should recognize this important opportunity and change its housing policies, which currently hamper it.

//

comments

Log In

  • Clara says:

    Sorry, I don’t agree wtih you either. Diversity, in terms of consuming alcohol, is a purely personal choice. It has nothing to do with say, if you were born a certain race, grew up in a certain area of the world, etc.
    More importantly though, I think substance free living is a great option, especially in a freshman dorm. Let’s get real here. I’m going into my junior year of college (at a college without substance free living) and have never encountered responsible, “purely social” drinking, especially among freshman. If students had even a small dose of maturity in this regard, I may have thought differently. I doubt you can show me three college freshman who just have half a glass of wine and sit and chat. No, it is usually binge drinking, to get drunk, because people are unable to deal with social and academic pressures, or are insecure. But that’s a whole different story.
    Furthermore, from personal experience, all of the damage and loud noises living in a freshman dorm came from other students’ drinking habits. Ripping down signs, puking in stairwells, slamming doors late at night… yes, I had to deal with all of this, and contribute to paying for damages, though I had nothing to do with any of it. A huge pain if you ask me.
    And if some people want to make fools of themselves and be obnoxious, go right ahead, but on your own time. Some people are actually in college to learn things other than how to do a keg stand. Having the option to live with like-minded individuals should be available. Again, if freshman (or rather anyone for that matter) could drink moderately, maturely, and responsibly, it would not be an issue.
    And you’re right that college is supposed to prepare you for the “real world”. But in the real world if your neighor is ripping down your fence posts and being overly loud at 3am, you have a right to do something about it and live peacefully. If anything, the drinkers should learn that they aren’t the only people on the planet and there are people with different lifestyles and viewpoints — that includes not drinking (or doing drugs, etc.) There is a time and place for trying alcoholic beverages in moderation. But the purpose of substance free housing is not to prohibit that, but to give students a sanctuary for the disgusting, immature, rude, and obnoxious habits that 99% of drinking college freshman have.

    Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  • Housing Forum says:

    Thanks for the Awful Information, At a glance!! I see, You are a man of Letters.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  • Schmau says:

    This really is not a very good argument. Just as you say, many people do have different beliefs than you, and those may very well be those who believe in sobriety as opposed to a more liberal standpoint. Some people just may not want to deal with drunk partiers as roommates. As you have also said, the students who are on these floors are able to drink in other areas. Even if a parent or some other circumstance foced them into a substance free floor, they can still go drink. One should be able to control themself enough to stop before getting totally wasted, and then he or she should be fine getting into hos or her room. If not, they should plan for a back up, such as staying in a friend on a different floor’s room. Finally, your argument about meeting people is ridiculous. Floors are hardly barriers, so limiting yourself to your own floor is just your own fault. You can meet whomever you wish to with just a few steps. And hey! you can burn the calories it takes to walk up the stairs, too. Just because someone lives in substance free housing does not mean they are not receiving the full college experience and they won’t be prepared for life- it just means that they are living in a different way than how others choose. You are disrespecting those who feel substance free housing is a great idea by demanding that your college change its options. It is not even affecting you anyway, so why even make such a big deal about it? Let those who do get into substance free housing, by choice or otherwise, make the most out of their college experience without badgering them about it. To you (with your broken logic), substance free housing seems terrible, but to another, it may be a safe haven. One man’s trash is another man’s treasure, as it were. Why would you limit the choices that the school offers to the diverse personalities that attend it?

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

3 Comments Add your comment
Student Life | The independent newspaper of Washington University in St. Louis since 1878