<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ekphrasis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis</link>
	<description>the visual blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:51:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on distinctions; the truly solely aesthetic; god by katiesadow</title>
		<link>http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/2009/10/distinctions-the-truly-solely-aesthetic-god/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>katiesadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/?p=89#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s Joseph embracing Mary, rather than manly Jesus embracing Mary while Mary embraces baby Jesus. That would be a little too miraculous, even for Christianity; I&#039;m pretty sure they believe in the linearity of time just like we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s Joseph embracing Mary, rather than manly Jesus embracing Mary while Mary embraces baby Jesus. That would be a little too miraculous, even for Christianity; I&#8217;m pretty sure they believe in the linearity of time just like we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on simulacra and simulation (of simulation of simulation of simulation&#8230;) by Indu</title>
		<link>http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/2009/09/simulacraandsimulation/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Indu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/?p=71#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I have missed hearing these philosophical musings/rants in the office, so reading this really took me back. Thanks, Dennis!

And yes, Comic Sans MUST DIE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have missed hearing these philosophical musings/rants in the office, so reading this really took me back. Thanks, Dennis!</p>
<p>And yes, Comic Sans MUST DIE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on simulacra and simulation (of simulation of simulation of simulation&#8230;) by $$$money$maker$booty$slapper$$$</title>
		<link>http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/2009/09/simulacraandsimulation/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>$$$money$maker$booty$slapper$$$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/?p=71#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I ain&#039;t no scholar or nothin&#039;, so I can&#039;t really understand most of what you said at the beginning of this post, but I don&#039;t exactly agree with your point about the death of sincerity in the age of the videocamera. 

I was going to quote an online dictionary&#039;s definition of sincerity at this point in my argument, but that seems like an infinitely recursive contradiction to me (not to mention the direct opposite of what I&#039;m trying to acheive in this post). The point I&#039;m trying to make is that clearly these people in the linked video don&#039;t really know what they&#039;re talking about (and insincerity seems contingent on this premise), but that doesn&#039;t mean that they do, in fact, lack sincerity. 

Let&#039;s be honest here: these students are commenting on a Princeton Review ranking of &quot;Quality of Life&quot;. At a &lt;i&gt;university&lt;/i&gt;. I mean, gimme a break... That&#039;s the equivalent of asking a fish how it feels about the ocean being wet.

&quot;Well... Um... It&#039;s, like, pretty cool and stuff. I mean, there&#039;s lots of water everywhere... And that&#039;s good because I need that to breath. And I guess all my food lives in water. So that&#039;s good, too. And I hear that the land is kinda dry. So... yea, I guess what I&#039;m trying to say is that I wouldn&#039;t have it any other way.&quot;

Of course, we have no way to know if the fish secretly hates being wet all the time. Or if, deep down, he really wishes that he was a coatimundi (look it up) so that he could finally crawl onto land and feel the thrill of hunting bird&#039;s eggs and insect larvae in trees. The fact of the matter is we &lt;i&gt;can&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; know these things. The only thing we can know is this transcript attained through questionable means by some freakish, underwater reporter with waterproof pens and paper who either found the only talking fish in the ocean or can speak with the denizens of the deep telepathically, &lt;i&gt;a la&lt;/i&gt; Aquaman.

But maybe that&#039;s besides the point. What I&#039;m really trying to get across here is that these students (or the fish, take your pick) are no less sincere because they are responding to a bogus question. Anyone would respond in the same way (make up a bunch of BS) because that&#039;s the only way they know how to respond. What we&#039;re seeing as the audience (to this or any video) is an infinitesimally small slice of a person that, just on the basis of it being a incomplete portion, can never be truly sincere. And maybe that&#039;s what you were trying to say, and in that case, I&#039;m really happy for you, I&#039;m gonna let you finish, but Comic Sans is one of the best fonts of all time. OF ALL TIME.

$$$money$maker$booty$slapper$$$ out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ain&#8217;t no scholar or nothin&#8217;, so I can&#8217;t really understand most of what you said at the beginning of this post, but I don&#8217;t exactly agree with your point about the death of sincerity in the age of the videocamera. </p>
<p>I was going to quote an online dictionary&#8217;s definition of sincerity at this point in my argument, but that seems like an infinitely recursive contradiction to me (not to mention the direct opposite of what I&#8217;m trying to acheive in this post). The point I&#8217;m trying to make is that clearly these people in the linked video don&#8217;t really know what they&#8217;re talking about (and insincerity seems contingent on this premise), but that doesn&#8217;t mean that they do, in fact, lack sincerity. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be honest here: these students are commenting on a Princeton Review ranking of &#8220;Quality of Life&#8221;. At a <i>university</i>. I mean, gimme a break&#8230; That&#8217;s the equivalent of asking a fish how it feels about the ocean being wet.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well&#8230; Um&#8230; It&#8217;s, like, pretty cool and stuff. I mean, there&#8217;s lots of water everywhere&#8230; And that&#8217;s good because I need that to breath. And I guess all my food lives in water. So that&#8217;s good, too. And I hear that the land is kinda dry. So&#8230; yea, I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is that I wouldn&#8217;t have it any other way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, we have no way to know if the fish secretly hates being wet all the time. Or if, deep down, he really wishes that he was a coatimundi (look it up) so that he could finally crawl onto land and feel the thrill of hunting bird&#8217;s eggs and insect larvae in trees. The fact of the matter is we <i>can&#8217;t</i> know these things. The only thing we can know is this transcript attained through questionable means by some freakish, underwater reporter with waterproof pens and paper who either found the only talking fish in the ocean or can speak with the denizens of the deep telepathically, <i>a la</i> Aquaman.</p>
<p>But maybe that&#8217;s besides the point. What I&#8217;m really trying to get across here is that these students (or the fish, take your pick) are no less sincere because they are responding to a bogus question. Anyone would respond in the same way (make up a bunch of BS) because that&#8217;s the only way they know how to respond. What we&#8217;re seeing as the audience (to this or any video) is an infinitesimally small slice of a person that, just on the basis of it being a incomplete portion, can never be truly sincere. And maybe that&#8217;s what you were trying to say, and in that case, I&#8217;m really happy for you, I&#8217;m gonna let you finish, but Comic Sans is one of the best fonts of all time. OF ALL TIME.</p>
<p>$$$money$maker$booty$slapper$$$ out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Re: form/content + fire safety by Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/2009/09/re-formcontent-fire-safety/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/?p=27#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Great looking fire hydrant! I completely agree with you on the whole just because its practical doesn&#039;t mean its not appealing. Its like what happening the cell phones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great looking fire hydrant! I completely agree with you on the whole just because its practical doesn&#8217;t mean its not appealing. Its like what happening the cell phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Re: form/content + fire safety by vicstar</title>
		<link>http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/2009/09/re-formcontent-fire-safety/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>vicstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studlife.com/ekphrasis/?p=27#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know which is cuter. The fireplug or your co-writer in a tie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know which is cuter. The fireplug or your co-writer in a tie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
